Horror Quote Of The Moment |
|
|
||
Horror Quote Of The Moment |
|
|
||
| Welcome to Under The Morgue. We have sections for each decade of film, from the 1910s onward, as well as sections for 10+ major franchises, close to 50 'smaller' franchises (containing five entries or less), creative writing, independent filmmaking, photography, music, Non-Horror films and TV shows, forum games, and boredom busters, and to top it all off there's an IM shoutbox at the bottom of the page for random chat. From the tame and 'kid sister friendly' to the psychological and mindbending to cheesy splatter flicks to hardcore torture-oriented horror, there's something here for everyone, so why not dive in? You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Ouija 2: Origin of Evil (2016) | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 30 2015, 09:46 PM (784 Views) | |
| Cherry Darling | Apr 30 2015, 09:46 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Killer's Accomplice
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() In 1965 Los Angeles, a widowed mother and her two daughters add a new stunt to bolster their séance scam business and unwittingly invite authentic evil into their home. When the youngest daughter is overtaken by the merciless spirit, this small family confronts unthinkable fears to save her and send her possessor back to the other side. Edited by Vanessa, Jun 23 2016, 05:30 PM.
|
| |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Lasser | Jun 21 2016, 02:56 AM Post #21 |
|
Sheriff
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Platinum Dunes may not but Blumhouse does because Jason Blum went to Flanagan to Improve on the original and the production company totally protected his vision and allowed for him to completely make the film he wanted to make. The first was made by a bunch of studio notes while this one is totally Flangan's creation and he has yet to disappoint. |
![]() |
|
| Kevin R. | Jun 21 2016, 02:58 AM Post #22 |
![]()
Stoner Guy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'll still wait for the reviews. Unless they're saying it's a substantial improvement over the first one (like The Purge: Anarchy was), I'm skipping this. |
![]() My blog: Kevin's Review Catalogue All reviews, A-Z Latest review: Ant-Man and the Wasp (2018) | |
![]() |
|
| Lasser | Jun 21 2016, 03:02 AM Post #23 |
|
Sheriff
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have no doubt that there will be a significant improvement from the first. Like I am not hesitantly optimistic or open about seeing this, I'm highly eager to see this and have good expectations.
Edited by Lasser, Jun 21 2016, 03:02 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lasser | Jun 22 2016, 05:34 PM Post #24 |
|
Sheriff
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() Here's the first poster. Trailer tomorrow! |
![]() |
|
| Lasser | Jun 23 2016, 04:44 PM Post #25 |
|
Sheriff
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In 1965 Los Angeles, a widowed mother and her two daughters add a new stunt to bolster their séance scam business and unwittingly invite authentic evil into their home. When the youngest daughter is overtaken by the merciless spirit, this small family confronts unthinkable fears to save her and send her possessor back to the other side. |
![]() |
|
| Vanessa | Jun 23 2016, 05:30 PM Post #26 |
![]()
Madman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
October 21st |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Basi | Jun 23 2016, 06:08 PM Post #27 |
|
Jock
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not see the first one yet, I heard it was really bad , It is really bad or Watchable bad It got better then ouija experiment ? |
![]() |
|
| Baby Firefly | Jun 25 2016, 03:02 AM Post #28 |
![]()
The Devil Himself
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If I paid as much attention to reviews as you do, I wouldn't have seen ninety percent of the films I've seen. ![]() But yeah, I'm not expecting too much from this. I'm surprised there's an October release date. That's just over 115 days away and I don't think I've heard much about this. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Repo | Jun 25 2016, 03:23 AM Post #29 |
![]()
Bitch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
To be fair, I never had any interest in Ouija in the first place. I thought it looked stupid and would probably suck. When the reviews echoed that sentiment, I skipped it. In contrast, I thought X-Men Apocalypse looked good. When the reviews disagreed... I saw it anyways and didn't care because I was interested. They mainly matter for movies I lack interest in or am borderline on. Like, I probably will end up watching The Shallows because of the surprisingly good reviews as well. Not in theaters, but. And that was a movie I was 100% sure that I would NOT be seeing. So it goes both ways here Edited by Repo, Jun 25 2016, 03:24 AM.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Puppy, just because there's no evidence she killed her aunt doesn't make her dating material. | |
![]() |
|
| Vanessa | Jun 29 2016, 04:12 AM Post #30 |
![]()
Madman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The trailer is good. It looks like the plot will be interesting. I'm shocked that I have seen one on television already. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Vanessa | Aug 29 2016, 11:59 PM Post #31 |
![]()
Madman
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There's more new posters. Dread Central has all of them.
|
![]() |
|
| Repo | Sep 19 2016, 03:37 PM Post #32 |
![]()
Bitch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The trailer for this is kinda hilariously terrible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Puppy, just because there's no evidence she killed her aunt doesn't make her dating material. | |
![]() |
|
| Lasser | Sep 19 2016, 07:24 PM Post #33 |
|
Sheriff
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The retro posters are great. I much prefer these to the 80s style ones. And I think the child actress here (Lulu Wilson?) Is going to be great and really deliver the chills. I mean she snagged a role in Annabelle 2 after this so she has the creepy child thing down! |
![]() |
|
| Baby Firefly | Sep 19 2016, 10:19 PM Post #34 |
![]()
The Devil Himself
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's really not that bad. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Repo | Sep 20 2016, 06:25 AM Post #35 |
![]()
Bitch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Disagreed. The scares are honestly silly. The little girl just speaking at the wall cause possessed? The slingshot scene? I honestly just find them laughable And I say this as someone who genuinely expected the trailer to be good. Oculus had flaws, but the directing was amazing. Edited by Repo, Sep 20 2016, 06:30 AM.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Puppy, just because there's no evidence she killed her aunt doesn't make her dating material. | |
![]() |
|
| Baby Firefly | Sep 20 2016, 06:32 AM Post #36 |
![]()
The Devil Himself
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree about the talking bit but I love the slingshot bit, lol. Honestly no more laughable than a lot of the scares from older films that are widely praised. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Repo | Sep 20 2016, 06:36 AM Post #37 |
![]()
Bitch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Which ones? Lol. I'm sure there's some I'd agree on but |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Puppy, just because there's no evidence she killed her aunt doesn't make her dating material. | |
![]() |
|
| Baby Firefly | Sep 20 2016, 06:41 AM Post #38 |
![]()
The Devil Himself
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ones that are basically the exact same sort of thing. Then there's stuff like the scares in the original House On Haunted Hill that (despite it being a good film) are ridiculously cheesy and lame but don't get many complaints. |
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Repo | Sep 20 2016, 06:47 AM Post #39 |
![]()
Bitch
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think cheesiness in older stuff is more forgiven due to FX issues and especially the extremely strict ratings system (the MPAA isn't good, but the Hayes Code is fucking HORRID) Endings especially got it bad due to the "bad guys must suffer comeuppance" rule to even receive an actual release (leading to silly scenarios and coincidences happening to make it passable, including a literal bolt of divine retribution at least once) That said, haven't seen HOHH so j can't judge there. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Puppy, just because there's no evidence she killed her aunt doesn't make her dating material. | |
![]() |
|
| Baby Firefly | Sep 20 2016, 06:54 AM Post #40 |
![]()
The Devil Himself
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Points to you for the Bad Seed mention. ![]() And I wasn't just talking about films that are THAT old. I was including some from the 80s and even 90s as well that had completely unoriginal, bland scares but are often totally forgiven for the nostalgia factor, it seems. Agreed about the code compared to the MPAA though. A lot of the scares I mentioned aren't just ones that involve effects. A lot are just people or sounds. And don't even get me started on the nonstop screaming and helplessness of the female characters (certainly something I do NOT miss about older films though some new films have that issue too). Overall, I'd say un originality is this film's problem, not general cheesiness or being laughable. Edited by Baby Firefly, Sep 20 2016, 06:55 AM.
|
![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · 2010s · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:04 PM Jul 11
|