|
Welcome to The Allied States
|
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Subsidy Repeal Act | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 22 2014, 11:00 AM (292 Views) | |
| CDLand | Dec 22 2014, 11:00 AM Post #1 |
![]()
Senate President
|
Subsidy Repeal Act Whereas the Senate recognizes that taxpayer funds should not be used to subsidize businesses, Whereas government subsidies unfairly influences the market in favor of politically connected businesses and industries, Whereas repealing government subsidies would return fairness to the marketplace, Section 1. Article VIII of Title III of the Forum Economy Act is hereby repealed. Introduced at the behest of the President. |
|
John Newman (LP-Buxton) First President of the Allied States Winner of the "Last to Post Wins" Contest!!!! | |
![]() |
|
| Zach21GF | Dec 22 2014, 12:45 PM Post #2 |
|
Debate is open for 24 hours I have nothing against repealing most of what is currently in the article, however I am worried about the future consequences as this for example would eliminate the possibility for subsidizing green energy, which could set the Allied States back economically in the near future. Edited by Zach21GF, Dec 22 2014, 12:47 PM.
|
|
Chris Bennington (IDP - Northeast) CEO of Dupont Industries My current personal platform E Pluribus Unum | |
![]() |
|
| Keventle | Dec 22 2014, 12:52 PM Post #3 |
|
Ron Reggie
|
green energy has no correlation to what is being repealed or the Economy. |
LIBERTARIAN PARTY FOUNDER![]() Job Stuff thoughts
| |
![]() |
|
| Zach21GF | Dec 22 2014, 12:55 PM Post #4 |
|
No it does not have a relation to what is being repealed at this point, my worries is that this is only the first step. And in the green energy sector does perhaps not have a massive influence on the economy of today, but one has to be blind to fail to see its future importance. |
|
Chris Bennington (IDP - Northeast) CEO of Dupont Industries My current personal platform E Pluribus Unum | |
![]() |
|
| CDLand | Dec 22 2014, 01:30 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Senate President
|
There aren't any subsidies for green energy currently. Furthermore, green energy is a "virtual business" and therefore has a lower likelihood of being subsidized anyways (subsidies in the past have tended to go to companies with real products) Besides, this bill clears the decks, it doesn't forbid any future subsidization. |
|
John Newman (LP-Buxton) First President of the Allied States Winner of the "Last to Post Wins" Contest!!!! | |
![]() |
|
| Zach21GF | Dec 22 2014, 03:47 PM Post #6 |
|
I once again want to stress that my worry lies in that this may be the first step towards a completely free market. I am also very worried in relation with the school security, which we may lose if this passes. Edited by Zach21GF, Dec 22 2014, 03:47 PM.
|
|
Chris Bennington (IDP - Northeast) CEO of Dupont Industries My current personal platform E Pluribus Unum | |
![]() |
|
| CDLand | Dec 22 2014, 03:52 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Senate President
|
The more appropriate forum for subsidizing green energy and school security, in my opinion, would be the government roleplay rather than the forum economy. In fact, the Clean Air Act as I recall already passed $15 billion in green energy research subsidies; those would be unaffected. |
|
John Newman (LP-Buxton) First President of the Allied States Winner of the "Last to Post Wins" Contest!!!! | |
![]() |
|
| Zach21GF | Dec 22 2014, 04:27 PM Post #8 |
|
School security would not be roleplay as there is an actual company. And perhaps in the not so distant future they will also need that money... |
|
Chris Bennington (IDP - Northeast) CEO of Dupont Industries My current personal platform E Pluribus Unum | |
![]() |
|
| Keventle | Dec 22 2014, 04:27 PM Post #9 |
|
Ron Reggie
|
I don't find any reason with this Slippery Slope Fallacy. It is what it is and not what will come. |
LIBERTARIAN PARTY FOUNDER![]() Job Stuff thoughts
| |
![]() |
|
| CDLand | Dec 26 2014, 08:06 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Senate President
|
bump |
|
John Newman (LP-Buxton) First President of the Allied States Winner of the "Last to Post Wins" Contest!!!! | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Failed Legislation · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:08 PM Jul 11
|












2:08 PM Jul 11