| We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Remember to visit our welcome thread here: Member Welcome Thread Join our community! *Flashing News*Email trigger on Alphadslr forum is now working. To setup the email trigger for your account: Just go to preference, select "Email & Subscription Settings" and Topic/Forum subscription alert type as "Alerts by email".. For thread tracking, you need to manually enable it for each thread. Once you're viewing a thread, scroll down to the bottom of the page. Locate the option "Track Topic" which appears to the left of the Board Time. From the page that loads you can select the notification type you want. |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| A100 iso1600; help needed | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 17 2008, 07:41 PM (1,238 Views) | |
| weishengg | Apr 17 2008, 07:41 PM Post #1 |
|
Alpha Elite Member
|
Hi all, I need some help over here. I realize that for the A100, an iso1600 shot looks a lot "duller" (colour wise) than an <=iso800 shot. Any recommendations on how to make the pictures vibrant again? i tried using the "Saturation-slider" in Picasa but it makes a lot of blue specks appear in the picture. I also tried shooting in Vibrant setting with Saturation +2, but that didnt seem to help much. Any comments? Cheers! weisheng |
|
weishengg.blogspot.com Snap away! | |
![]() |
|
| DewaKarma | Apr 17 2008, 08:11 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Beauty lies in the eyes of its beholder
|
Buy A700
|
|
Think a new system... | |
![]() |
|
| Ming | Apr 17 2008, 09:10 PM Post #3 |
|
90609866
|
For me i never ever tried shooting A100 with ISO higher than 400 after knowing 'what' it will produced ... You want vibrant results ? Shoot with ISO100 or maximum ISO400 then go do in Photoshop ba . :lol: |
|
Ask ... Absorb ... Equip ... Execute N E X with M I N G HERE ! A P - Ming HERE ! Macro-Ming HERE ! Pano-Ming HERE ! Food ! Food ! Foods ! HERE | |
![]() |
|
| Shadow | Apr 17 2008, 09:36 PM Post #4 |
|
Global Moderator
![]()
|
Maybe you may like to post the 2 shots of ISO800 and ISO1600 for us to see and advise. |
![]() My iP4S Street Photography Blog Just a Shadow | |
![]() |
|
| Trigger Happy | Apr 18 2008, 01:08 AM Post #5 |
|
Alpha Jedi Member
|
aiyoh... poison!!! weishengg, this is normal, higher iso will introduce more noise into your picture as the film (in today's context, the sensor) is more sensitive to light. i'd avoid 1600 if possible. 800 is as far as i'd go, even with the a700 unless there's sufficient light like flash use. two ways to "rescue" the picture: 1. use noise reducing s/w - like NeatImage (free) although this would likely dull your pic further as some detail is lost when noise is removed. 2. turn the picture to b&w - simple desaturate or other more complicated techniques |
|
---------------------------------- Many are culled, few are chosen | |
![]() |
|
| weishengg | Apr 18 2008, 03:04 AM Post #6 |
|
Alpha Elite Member
|
oh no! think i got misunderstood I am aware that at iso800-1600 i will be getting lotsa noise on this camera (chroma noise especially :wacko: ) but i'm just curious why the iso1600 pictures appear a bit desaturated as compared to one at iso800, and what would be a good way to salvage the loss in vibrancy of colours. will post up some pictures soon to elaborate my point sorry for the confusion! oh and of course, the a700... the best way out...
|
|
weishengg.blogspot.com Snap away! | |
![]() |
|
| zcf | Apr 18 2008, 10:11 AM Post #7 |
|
Alpha Elite Member
|
As we notice, A100 at ISO1600 only have a dynamic range of 6.2 EV, ISO 800 have 7.0 EV, while normally it's 8.1 EV. So it lose out dynamic range in high ISO mode like ISO1600. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/SonyDSLRA100/page21.asp At ISO it has a duller colour mainly due to noise suppression. Adjust higher contrast will bring out the boise or blue dots as you notice. But If you resize the image into a much smaller size, it may help to reduce the noticeable noise. |
![]() |
|
| RiRi | Apr 18 2008, 02:35 PM Post #8 |
|
Alpha Elite Member
|
Yea , generally for a100. I try not to shoot past iso 400, the quality of the pics drop dramatically. But i have not seen what happens if you shoot wif A700 ISO1600. Is it as grainy? |
![]() |
|
| Trigger Happy | Apr 18 2008, 11:31 PM Post #9 |
|
Alpha Jedi Member
|
nope. its quite good. but to me, its still obvious. |
|
---------------------------------- Many are culled, few are chosen | |
![]() |
|
| ChaoxAngel | Apr 21 2008, 01:00 PM Post #10 |
![]()
:@
:D :3
:) :] :x
:o :z :>
;)
|
After eliminating the chroma noise, it should look like film grain.
|
|
Official Website | Facebook Profile | Facebook Page | Model Mayhem | iStudio | Deviant Art ChaoxAngel's APAD on ALPHADSLR | Sony Digital Workshop | |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Newbie corner & website links · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2










8:17 AM Jul 11