WELCOME TO AO, MORTAL!! ![]() You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| seen any good movies lately?; Split from "Whatcha Watching?" | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Aug 12 2006, 09:02 AM (2,697 Views) | |
| qumkent | Jan 16 2009, 09:32 AM Post #46 |
|
NOT AN AO MEMBER!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I haven't seen that yet! I really wan't to though, it's supposed to be excellent. |
![]() |
|
| The Palentine | Jan 17 2009, 10:09 AM Post #47 |
![]()
The thinking man's pervert
![]()
|
I'm reading a book about the slayings of high profile people, and the Harvey Milk assasination is covered in the book. I forgot all about that one....of course I was only in either 3rd or 4th grade when it happened. |
![]() |
|
| Gruenberg | Jan 26 2009, 05:04 PM Post #48 |
![]()
aka Kleinschnauzer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I really enjoyed it, and like you I found it improved my opinion of Penn, who can be terribly overwrought. My one reservation: the Hispanic boyfriend was ridiculous. |
![]() |
|
| Snefaldia | Jan 29 2009, 06:51 AM Post #49 |
|
No one's hotter than Bea.
![]()
|
I think ridiculous by design; Diego Luna was portraying an actual person Harvey Milk had a relationship with back in those days. I thought Emile Hirsch was a great choice; those ridiculous glasses just turned him into his character. |
![]() |
|
| Zarquon Froods | Jan 29 2009, 09:08 AM Post #50 |
![]()
Steamaholic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I didn't know if I wanted to go see Milk or not since I simply loathe Sean Penn. But, seeing as how there are some that say he was actually good in it I may go see it soon. |
![]() |
|
| Cobdenia | Jan 29 2009, 10:44 AM Post #51 |
![]()
1953 is the new 1932 for 2008
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Saw Valkyrie last night. Rather enjoyed, and not too much for me to be pedantic about! |
![]() |
|
| qumkent | Jan 29 2009, 11:02 AM Post #52 |
|
NOT AN AO MEMBER!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You don't think it was all a bit tasteless " Nazi Chic " ? |
![]() |
|
| Cobdenia | Jan 29 2009, 11:19 AM Post #53 |
![]()
1953 is the new 1932 for 2008
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not really; the story was broadly accurate (a couple of merged characters and the like, but nothing really appalling), and the feel was right - you wanted Stauffenberg to succede (even if you knew nothing about the regime, this feel was imparted by the film-makers - if that makes sense). As for Nazi chic...well, there buildings were designed by Speer, and their uniforms by Hugo Boss, so it's not exactly the film-makers fault they look look rather stylish. |
![]() |
|
| qumkent | Jan 29 2009, 11:41 AM Post #54 |
|
NOT AN AO MEMBER!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh yes the story was as accurate as one could expect, I just thought that the "pretty" side of national socialism got too much screen time. |
![]() |
|
| Cobdenia | Jan 30 2009, 03:02 AM Post #55 |
![]()
1953 is the new 1932 for 2008
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ah, but the ugly side had little relevence to the story - the majority of the officers wanted Hitler out because he was losing the war, and because they realised a war with Russia was unwinnable, not because of the holocaust or the other aspects (in fairness, that does not mean they agreed with them, but it wasn't their priority) |
![]() |
|
| qumkent | Jan 30 2009, 03:08 AM Post #56 |
|
NOT AN AO MEMBER!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And yet Tom Cruise's character comes off as a heroic
|
![]() |
|
| Snefaldia | Jan 30 2009, 08:09 AM Post #57 |
|
No one's hotter than Bea.
![]()
|
Well, he was, wasn't he? Trying to kill the man he thought responsible for Germany's inevitable defeat, responsible for the destruction of the old aristocracy, etc. Stauffenberg is a huge hero in Germany today. |
![]() |
|
| Cobdenia | Jan 30 2009, 08:12 AM Post #58 |
![]()
1953 is the new 1932 for 2008
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Deservedly so; a man of great courage |
![]() |
|
| qumkent | Jan 30 2009, 10:12 AM Post #59 |
|
NOT AN AO MEMBER!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think his heroism depends on perspective entirely, there's certainly no concrete evidence that he objected to the final solution, and whoever might have replaced Hitler and ended the war in the east was in no way guarenteed to be any less genocidal, perhaps fewer Jews e.t.c. from eastern europe would have been liquidated but really only as a byproduct of Germany no longer occupying that theatre. More western european jews and others might have met their ends at the hands of the Nazis instead. And besides if Germany had made peace with Russia, the war in Western Europe could have been prolonged with concurrent loss of both civilian and military lives, indeed with peace in the east securred, who knows what the germans might have been able to achieve in western Europe. I think Stauffenberg was indifferent about the first of these an outcomes and entirely in favour of a National Socialist German mastery of western Europe. |
![]() |
|
| Kenny | Jan 30 2009, 10:33 AM Post #60 |
|
King of California
![]()
|
Stick to the movie, please. You can always start a separate topic on whether or not von Stauffenberg was a real hero. |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |

WELCOME TO AO, MORTAL!! 


![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)









11:26 AM Jul 11