| Welcome to the Commonwealth, the regional forum for Atlantis, Caprecia, New Sorvun, Nysa and The United States of Europe. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Multiple Nations | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 25 2012, 12:06 PM (304 Views) | |
| Post #1 Sep 25 2012, 12:06 PM | Tziporrah L. Szatkowski |
|
Right, I don't think the current system makes having multiple nations very fair. Basically, by choosing two nations located on your three land plots, you get two sets of 70 points to distribute amongst the attributes. I believe that to make this fair, people who choose to create two nations shouldn't have as many points to distribute. My whole point is that those who have created two nations are able to distribute 140 points amongst their three plots, whereas everyone else has only 70. I suggest we make it so you have a total of 70 points to distribute whether you create one nation or not. |
![]()
Dealmaker
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #2 Sep 25 2012, 12:08 PM | Baal |
| Awesome. Then I'll stick with my one nation. |
Auxiliary
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #3 Sep 25 2012, 12:08 PM | Svunbrink |
| No worries. Ill just stick with Svunbrink. |
Contender
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #4 Sep 25 2012, 01:11 PM | Brum Brum |
|
As long as they can't ally i don't see the issue. We specifically stopped allying in multiple nations for this very reason so that any extra power for the extra nation can't be combined with the first one. Can we just get on rather than trying to constantly change the system.All this would do is cause people to choose one type of nation and then we'd lose variety of types of nations in the rp. Case in point Drumtrodden(european) is quite liberal and very european but its not allied with Rhomais who are a nation with a variety of groups. I'd say leave it as it is with a ban on co-operation or allying between nations if they are owned by the same player.
Edited by Brum Brum, Sep 25 2012, 01:12 PM.
|
Negotiator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #5 Sep 25 2012, 01:42 PM | Tziporrah L. Szatkowski |
|
I disagree. I think that people who choose to remain with one nation should at least get extra points for their nation to make things a little fairer. Unless we are going to make it so players with multiple nations have to make their nations hate each other, I think it's unfair that you guys get 140 points to distribute whilst everyone else gets 70. For example, Brum Brum, you had two nations in the last game which were almost exactly the same, but they weren't 'formally' allied, so they didn't come under the military co-operation ban. So unless there is a concrete ban against allying or even co-operating in the slightest, I think we need to tske a look at the points system. |
![]()
Dealmaker
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #6 Sep 25 2012, 02:58 PM | Brum Brum |
| I'd go with concrete ban against co-operating. |
Negotiator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #7 Sep 25 2012, 03:06 PM | Deckard Christopher |
| You guys don't consider me having multiple nations do you? |
Dealmaker
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
Deckard Christopher The United States of Nova Angleterre - The Gentleman Villain Follow Me on TWITTER!Deckard Christopher's Twitter THE EMPIRE OF NOVA ANGLETERRE Nova Angleterre Nova Angleterre II Nova Angleterre III | |
|
![]() |
| Post #8 Sep 25 2012, 04:18 PM | Tziporrah L. Szatkowski |
| No. Your nations are united and you used only one set of 70 points to determine your nation's attributes. |
![]()
Dealmaker
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #9 Sep 25 2012, 07:10 PM | Kenneth Williams |
| How about 50 points per plot? |
![]()
Auxiliary
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Its like I say, a little bit of what you fancy does you good.
| |
|
![]() |
| Post #10 Sep 25 2012, 08:31 PM | Likako A. Nehio |
| I do not think multiple nations are fair at all, I think with our new attribute system we should be limited to one nation, 3 initial plots, and 70 initial attribute points. If someone doesn't like the way their nation is going, let it die, then create a new one. It is impossible for a player to keep their multiple nations from being identical from one another, as time goes on. For example, in the last rendition of this game, I attempted to play as four separate nations, and in the end they ended up being the same despite being vastly different in the beginning. |
Enforcer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
Each Region is Unique and they should be Respected and Protected!! Join the RPA Now! Let us press forward and move this Commonwealth down the right path! Likako on Twitter | Likako on Youtube ![]() Deputy General (RPA) Lord Chancellor (PNP) Military High Commander of NSMF FRA Rangers: Corporal ![]() ]Full Service Record
| |
|
![]() |
| Post #11 Sep 25 2012, 08:47 PM | Tziporrah L. Szatkowski |
| Well, I think the game has benefited greatly from players having multiple nations, but I do think there needs to be a limit. |
![]()
Dealmaker
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #12 Sep 25 2012, 11:26 PM | Brum Brum |
| Maybe the way is to limit multiple nations to two and make sure that multiple nations don't co-operate. |
Negotiator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #13 Sep 25 2012, 11:33 PM | Svunbrink |
| Seems fair. |
Contender
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| Post #14 Sep 26 2012, 08:16 AM | Likako A. Nehio |
| How can we enforce this "don't cooperate" business? There needs to be some clear definition. |
Enforcer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
Each Region is Unique and they should be Respected and Protected!! Join the RPA Now! Let us press forward and move this Commonwealth down the right path! Likako on Twitter | Likako on Youtube ![]() Deputy General (RPA) Lord Chancellor (PNP) Military High Commander of NSMF FRA Rangers: Corporal ![]() ]Full Service Record
| |
|
![]() |
| Post #15 Sep 26 2012, 03:49 PM | Brum Brum |
| No treaties ,alliances etc... |
Negotiator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Historical Archives · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:43 AM Jul 11
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy






![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)






]
1:43 AM Jul 11