| Welcome to the NDU's forums. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll not only be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls, but you'll be able to enjoy the rights as citizens, such as voting on the RMB. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Amendment to the Constitution | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 4 2012, 06:35 PM (623 Views) | |
| Deleted User | Jul 4 2012, 06:35 PM Post #1 |
|
Deleted User
|
|
|
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Deleted User | Jul 5 2012, 02:56 AM Post #41 |
|
Deleted User
|
(Check the edit I made.) It's because of checks and balances. I don't want powers being passed without any checks on them. |
|
|
| Welsh Cowboy | Jul 5 2012, 02:59 AM Post #42 |
|
President of DUAN
|
I still don't think mandatory is the way to go, maybe a variation... But I really want to hear Congress I will not veto if this amendment package passes Congress 4-1 or unanimously. I would only consider it if it was 3-2. |
|
Current President of DUAN Please telegram me with questions! | |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 5 2012, 03:06 AM Post #43 |
|
Deleted User
|
With that in mind, I wish to wait until I've secured the needed votes until this is proposed. |
|
|
| Birkinghamia | Jul 5 2012, 09:50 PM Post #44 |
|
Founder
|
I still think the impeachments should be 4/5 - until then I won't add my signature. Otherwise I think this is fine, except in Article III, Section I ("...The number of representatives shall increase by one for every twenty citizens gained, or for every region joining the commonwealth. Representatives added as the result of a region joining the commonwealth will disappear immediately after that region leaves the commonwealth.") all instances of the Commonwealth should be removed (this is not included in your proposal). Also, I'm pretty sure "plutarity" should be plurality
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 5 2012, 09:59 PM Post #45 |
|
Deleted User
|
I'll get working on the second part, and I've sent you a TG about the first part. |
|
|
| Birkinghamia | Jul 5 2012, 10:10 PM Post #46 |
|
Founder
|
Alright, I changed my position on the 3/5 and 4/5 thing. As soon as the second things is finished, count me in. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Jul 5 2012, 10:12 PM Post #47 |
|
Deleted User
|
1: I have added an amendment removing references to the Commonwealth. 2: I have fixed plurality. |
|
|
| Birkinghamia | Jul 5 2012, 10:27 PM Post #48 |
|
Founder
|
Alright, I think it's fine, I'll propose it. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Proposal Creation/Discussion Thread · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:25 PM Jul 11
|
edge created by tiptopolive of ifsz






2:25 PM Jul 11