| Why? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 5 2012, 05:39 PM (748 Views) | |
| pain | Jun 2 2012, 03:09 PM Post #21 |
|
Ille qui potest magis
|
No. Not psychotic. Patient, waiting. Your drive for power is wavering though, seeing as you've been put in a position of power that you've grown accustomed too. You hate the WA, but use some parts of it to your advantage. Entity should raid a pro WA region. Or atleast a proxy region for pro WA, or anti-fascists. Hm. |
![]() |
|
| pain | Jun 2 2012, 03:24 PM Post #22 |
|
Ille qui potest magis
|
As soon as convenience would allow so, and I pray it be soon, I do love a good agitated region official being dismounted. |
![]() |
|
| Monsters From the Id | Jun 2 2012, 09:20 PM Post #23 |
|
Enigma
|
As founder, it could be argued that I was never put in any position not of my own devising. Power? I desire to free the world from the madness. If this very hour, the over-your-shoulder World Assembly was destroyed and raiding took place only through actual war 'gameplay', I would rejoice. If all regions became Warzones, I would not complain. If newly-formed or resurrected nations could appear from ANY region, I would laugh with pleasure, at forcing all to remain on their proverbial toes, all the time. The joy of a world without limits, without rules...gives me the best of chills. But regardless: even now the Acting Comandante of Entity moves toward proving his worth in holding the role. To state targets in an 'open area' such as this would be foolish...but the fact of targets existing can be admitted. Meanwhile, just hours ago, affiliation with the Coalition of Raiders has commenced, to add numbers to future operations; numbers that can potentially be easily inspired to harm WA regions, given the massive degree of general Defender support for the organization. Also, as an aside: Entity uses the fascist tag due to a current lack of authortiarian tag. While agreeing with numerous concepts inherent in their 'leadership principle', most fascist regions propagate idiotic racist policies that ultimately result only in their own weakening. Ideas, not skin color, make a person's worth. The war with Antifa, the erstwhile militant anti-fascists, extends solely from their hostility towards us, and towards the doctrine that those with the power to rule will ever do so. |
![]() |
|
| pain | Jun 2 2012, 11:20 PM Post #24 |
|
Ille qui potest magis
|
The world without rules is a world with limits, not without. As blissful as an anarchic state may sound, some, who admirably thirst for what they should (power), will take the system's downfall as advantage, and even if someone like you and the Entity were to fight against this new over-watch, your fighting is futile. The governing states, the governing itself, is a hydra. Once one head is decapitated, two more takes its place, systematically taking out any chance of freedom, of limitlessness, and of peace. Your "freeing the world of madness" damns you. So, to be a real hero, or rather leader as you're deemed to be so, respectably, you need a villain, an adversary. But once this adversary is depleted of life, more will takes it's place, possibly even more controlling than this beast, and regions like Entity will be deprived of energy and power before the fifth wave of power hits. (but, then again, there is the matter of fact that this is a game, and the WA is built into the game itself...) |
![]() |
|
| Monsters From the Id | Jun 15 2012, 04:01 AM Post #25 |
|
Enigma
|
But you see, if greater enemies arise to take the place of those we hate, more fury will be available to be fanned, and more destruction of their kind will result. Entity, in the end, seeks the extremitization of the opposing doctrines of chaos and order, so as to demonstrate to the many the futility of their being in conflict. Quite simply, Entity would destroy the world in order to save it from itself. "When the forest grows too thick, a cleansing fire is both pure and natural." And yes, I am aware of the WA being built into the game. As such, I desire to destroy the game. It really is that simple. |
![]() |
|
| pain | Jun 20 2012, 05:22 PM Post #26 |
|
Ille qui potest magis
|
Hm. It would also involve disintegrating Entity. And once it's destroyed, what then? You burned down the forest. What are you building on the land, or leaving it to rot? |
![]() |
|
| Monsters From the Id | Jun 23 2012, 05:13 PM Post #27 |
|
Enigma
|
A new forest grows, if nature wasn't kept from taking its course for too long. Given recent events, Entity must change into a belief system and doctrine, instead of a region that can be directly assaulted. This change, while painful even to its executioner in being undertaken, was and is absolutely necessary. Welcome to the new version of Entity: still the place where you have the freedom to feel and think and say whatever you might wish, whenever you might wish it (with the exception of security, of course, in planning attacks against the filth). |
![]() |
|
| pain | Jul 2 2012, 10:28 PM Post #28 |
|
Ille qui potest magis
|
I see. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Voices in the Halls · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
3:28 AM Jul 11
|






3:28 AM Jul 11