|Welcome to the Financial Party discussion board. This is the place to discuss the stuff that we post on our web site. Keep your posts relevant, positive, and treat each other with respect. If you haven’t visited our web site yet, please don’t bother posting here until you have. You need to understand the context of the conversations first.|
Choose the correct Forum before you post. For example, if the topic that you want to discuss appeared on the Income page of our web site, choose the Income Forum here to discuss it. If you just have some general comments to make, then please use the General Forum here.
You're currently viewing our board as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.
Join our community!
If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:
|Public Credit; bye-bye debt|
|Tweet Topic Started: Oct 13 2013, 09:37 PM (123 Views)|
|hostFP||Oct 13 2013, 09:37 PM Post #1|
Is using public credit, to eliminate the need for debt and interest for everyone, a good idea? Is it clear why public credit would be an accounting method only, not a method of financing?
Edited by hostFP, Oct 14 2013, 12:29 AM.
|hamenniby||Dec 31 2014, 03:27 PM Post #2|
I just came across this piece on Unconditional Basic Income (UBI):
I'm curious to hear your perspective on this article. In particular, I'm interested in your thoughts on the different ways a UBI could be implemented.
From the article: "And there are many ways to pay for it: through reworking our tax system, by instituting a consumption tax, eliminating income taxes and putting in a small wealth tax; and there are many other ideas that should be discussed and reviewed."
What do you think of these suggestions, and how does your proposal differ from them? Are there other approaches (besides your own) that you would support?
|hostFP||Apr 13 2015, 10:55 PM Post #3|
Personally I'm not in favour of any system that takes money from one person to give to someone else... especially when it's taken without the explicit consent of the person that it's taken from. Normally we use the word "robbery" to define such an act. If you believe that there is a genuine need for a UBI, why not create brand new money to fund it rather than confiscating other people's money?
Here's a quick little math test for you.
If you earn $100 and the government takes $25 of it away from you to give to someone else, what percentage of the total purchasing power do you have left? (answer: 75%)
and what percentage of your original purchasing power have you given up? (answer: 25%)
If you earn $100 and the government creates another $25 to give to someone else, what percentage of the total purchasing power do you have now? (answer: 80%)
and what percentage of your original purchasing power have you given up? (answer: 0%)
If you earn $100 and the government creates another $50 to give $25 to both you and someone else, what percentage of the total purchasing power do you have now? (answer: 83.3%)
and what percentage of your original purchasing power have you given up? (answer: still 0%)
Would it not be fairer to workers to fund a UBI this way?
I have not seen any other approaches that go anywhere near the roots of the problems with our current money system. The other ideas out there are all band-aids for a particular symptom of the deeper problems.
Edited by hostFP, Apr 14 2015, 03:59 AM.
|1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)|
|« Previous Topic · Credit Forum · Next Topic »|