| Welcome to Fusion. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you are registering with a Yahoo e-mail address, or if you are having trouble receiving your validation e-mail, please refer to this topic for assistance. If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Mary Jane | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 7 2006, 02:13 AM (2,103 Views) | |
| Brazy CK | Jan 11 2006, 10:32 PM Post #91 |
![]()
5 warnings=ban
![]()
|
How is it possible to get an accurate count of the popularity of an illegal drug? o_o; |
![]() |
|
| Severian | Jan 11 2006, 10:36 PM Post #92 |
![]()
Bucket/Schtolteheim from FEW
![]()
|
No, powder is illagal and the law does enforce it. But there are harsher laws against crack cocaine, even though it has the SAME effect as powder. It'd be like making alcohol illegal, but making certain brands of beer more illegal than others for no reason. Main difference is that 80% of crack users are black, while only 3?% of powder users are black, as far as I know. I've never really heard a good explanation for this law. I don't plan on getting of topic, but I figured I should take a small amount of time to explain it. |
|
[size=5]"We must also remember that the emotions have a logic of their own, for which the formula is 'I feel sure that this is so.'"[/size] ~JAK Thomson, Rhetorical Prose Thinking of Maud, You Forget Everything Else Red Pandas are so cute it makes me sick. | |
![]() |
|
| Sentenal | Jan 11 2006, 10:39 PM Post #93 |
|
Won the Impossible Debate (twice)
![]()
|
I said on Alcohol. Its not too late for Pot.
Voting. Elections. People who support legalization of pot loose. |
[/center]Conquered FEFF Awards
| |
![]() |
|
| Brazy CK | Jan 12 2006, 05:30 PM Post #94 |
![]()
5 warnings=ban
![]()
|
Once again, because we all know how pure and uncorrupt our voting system is. =/ |
![]() |
|
| (*Jman*) | Jan 12 2006, 06:36 PM Post #95 |
|
Kakatte Koi!
![]()
|
It's a democracy Richie. You should expect that. Because Humans are corrupt too. |
![]() ![]() Formerly Omni, Rosa, Terra, Serra, Captain Star Falco, Minamimoto | |
![]() |
|
| Wind Sword | Jan 12 2006, 09:07 PM Post #96 |
|
SKILLNADEN ÄR DRINKABILITY
![]()
|
Don't forget the government can legalize the dosage, so some idiot doesn't add something else or cause an overdose. Woops, helped the liberals, better change direction. The vast majority of potheads are young people. If this does get passed, an age limit is garaunteed. So you just legalized a drug so it's easily obtainable to a group that shouldn't legally get any.
You sound, frankly, like Marcus with his ridiculous Catholic Conspiracy. If there was anyway corruption in the voting system, don't you think the liberals would have used it as cannon fodder. And that doesn't explain how parties can simply change rapidly. You attack the very foundation of our democracy with unfounded accusations. Alcohol and cigarettes wouldn't be illegal for two simple reasons: 1.Liberals stand for giving people the right to everything under the sun, so they wouldn't dare attack them. 2.Republicans stand for business, and the tobacco and alcohol industries are huge. Neither party has a problem with it. The Moral of this Story: Vote Nader! |
~~Wind Sword
Touching. Scientology
Smartest post ever made. | |
![]() |
|
| Mind Bomber | Jan 12 2006, 09:13 PM Post #97 |
![]()
Unofficial M:tG Overlord
![]()
|
The Dems can't mudsling for crap these days. They've got ammo out the wazoo, they just ain't using it. Trust me, there is corruption. |
HLL>-0)U<ZAWU0AW|-IHv^=^-EEW3H|-I|-IW|-L<Zv^_|<|-H0Z![]() [size=-2]This is not a subliminal message[/size] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Reaver | Jan 12 2006, 09:31 PM Post #98 |
|
Troll
![]()
|
I mentioned that early on man. ._. |
| |
![]() |
|
| Prince_Lyon | Jan 13 2006, 04:39 PM Post #99 |
![]()
|
It wouldn't be smart to outlaw alcohol because of what happened before. danger, man. Some peopel say that that is what first made crime a big business in the US. They shouldn't legalize marojiana becuase it kills the braincells and is relaly bad for you. People using it while driving ot such is extremely dangerous. Legalized merijuana would be like lessening gun restrictions in the ghettos of New york. |
|
My dying Fire Emblem Board. Lyon pwns you all. | |
![]() |
|
| Brazy CK | Jan 13 2006, 05:28 PM Post #100 |
![]()
5 warnings=ban
![]()
|
Pretty much every one of your arguments has already been tackled in this topic. And please try to spell better, I had a hard time reading that. |
![]() |
|
| Prince_Lyon | Jan 13 2006, 05:32 PM Post #101 |
![]()
|
my spelling isn't great. I'm sorry about that. I know that all of my arguments have been covered, but it seems like most everyhitng has already. |
|
My dying Fire Emblem Board. Lyon pwns you all. | |
![]() |
|
| Mind Bomber | Jan 15 2006, 06:49 PM Post #102 |
![]()
Unofficial M:tG Overlord
![]()
|
When it comes to hitngs, we haven't even scratched the surface.
Still, many points have been raised on each side, and it's obvious neither will sway the ither much. Let me just say this: If pot is legalized, no one's going to shove a huge crop of hash down your throat. As with alcohol and tobacco, the consumer will have the choice of whether to use marijuana or not. Many anti-pot arguements seem (to me) to imply that the instant marijuana is legalized, pot smoke will be pumped through the climate control systems of every building in the country and every individual in the nation will be forced high. Such would not be the case. Stoners would probably have more money for snack chips and less craving for other drugs that would've been cut with the reefer by dealers, but not by the FDA. People who don't want to try weed wouldn't. Clinton could inhale. That is all. |
HLL>-0)U<ZAWU0AW|-IHv^=^-EEW3H|-I|-IW|-L<Zv^_|<|-H0Z![]() [size=-2]This is not a subliminal message[/size] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Wind Sword | Jan 15 2006, 09:31 PM Post #103 |
|
SKILLNADEN ÄR DRINKABILITY
![]()
|
Clinton DID inhale. Give me a break. I'm sorry if anyone gave you that impression, I certainly wasn't getting it myself. But regardless, legalizing it will make it so the people who do want it will have it. I'm not sure why exactly this is even being debated. We can legalize a deadly drug, or we can't. The reasoning behind letting them have it is that if we make it legal, they won't use it. I'm I the only one seeing the horrifically flawed logic here? |
~~Wind Sword
Touching. Scientology
Smartest post ever made. | |
![]() |
|
| Sentenal | Jan 15 2006, 10:22 PM Post #104 |
|
Won the Impossible Debate (twice)
![]()
|
I realize your exageratating, but one of my arguements is that pot effects others, not just the user. If someone is getting drunk next to me, I will not get drunk from the alcohol. If someone is smoking pot next to me, I will feel the effects. Thats a fact. |
[/center]Conquered FEFF Awards
| |
![]() |
|
| Neo | Jan 16 2006, 12:07 AM Post #105 |
|
Tits and Ass
![]()
|
You do realize that most states have banned smoking in public areas liek resturants and such :? |
|
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
3:14 AM Jul 11
|










[/center]



















3:14 AM Jul 11