| Welcome to Gamers Abyss #42. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Open Office (OO.org); partial review, based on my experiences | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Dec 21 2006, 03:18 PM (229 Views) | |
| Draconic-Hybrid | Dec 21 2006, 03:18 PM Post #1 |
|
Unregistered
|
I learned how to use MSFT Office origionally. Then I moved to Lotus (just cause it was free with my PC), which I positively hated (Negitive marks across the board... I just couldn't find anything the first time w/o spending 20 min digging through menu after menu. <_<). Anyways, back to the prime focus of this review, Open Office. I'll compare and contrast to MSFT Office based on my experiences.... Ease of use: Just about everything I've had to do in MSFT I can do as easily or easier in OO.org -- which as a general rule I personally find more intuitive. Notable "easier"s include: multiple numbering schemes for pages (which transfers to MSFT properly when you hit "Save As" btw) and inputting Formulae. You can even auto-update it over a net connection, keep it on a THUMB Drive (see my "Portable Applications, Anyone?" topic), and the documents are compressed (no image compression though sadly). You can also save to MSFT if you are working on a computer/network that won't allow OO.org use (like the CC). OO.org: 8/10, MSFT: 7/10 Cost: OO.org wins by a landslide here -- no $$$ cost whatsoever, unlike MSFT's entry. OO.org: 10/10 (come on, how can free be anything less in terms of cost alone?), MSFT: 0/10 (ok, this is a point I'm biased on) Features: My only complaint regarding OO.org here is that it is harder to set some object properties (entering a dialog vs clicking a button on the toolbar) than those same object properties in MSFT. And there is a notable lack of Grammar checking, which can be mostly eliminated via expansion code (the one I like is LanguageTool, you can find it using a Google search in about 5 min.) OO.org: 7.8/10 (simply due to my complaints), MSFT: 8/10 Overall: if you didn't get MSFT free, I would get this instead and save yourself the $$$. OO.org: 8/10, MSFT: 5/10 Since theis is essentially my first review, I'll open the floor to comments on how I could review better and any questions / flames / ect. |
|
|
| Renegade | Dec 23 2006, 01:29 AM Post #2 |
|
what
|
You might have mentioned that there are far more MSO users than OO... hell over here I haven't found a single person that uses OO, and even if I started to use it, I'd need to convert back to MSO for school projects and documents. That's the only reason I don't use open source progams yet... they might be more useful, but no one else uses them, and compatibility is a bitch. |
![]() |
|
| Darkstalker | Dec 23 2006, 09:11 AM Post #3 |
|
~ The QUEEN ~
|
Yes. I've used Open Office before, but I quickly reverted back due to this.
|
![]() |
|
| televised | Dec 23 2006, 01:37 PM Post #4 |
|
Sexy Commando
|
You can save in the appropriate formats. |
![]() |
|
| Draconic-Hybrid | Dec 27 2006, 02:15 PM Post #5 |
|
Unregistered
|
Thanks guys, forgot to mention that. But yah, I have to do that cause the CC wants to be "mainstream." |
|
|
| « Previous Topic · General · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:26 PM Jul 11
|
Hosted for free by ZetaBoards · Privacy Policy







1:26 PM Jul 11