Speaker of the People's Assembly and World Assembly Delegate Pidgeon Island Members of the Committee TBA World Assembly Delegate Angusp (aka Bodegraven) High General of the GRADF Joe Bobs |
| Welcome to the Global Right Alliance's forums! Firstly, you can only see a very limited amount of the forums at the moment. You will be able to see the full forums and properly participate in our region and its community when you register. Join our Community Now, on to the region itself. Don't let the name, specifically the "Right", fool you. We've got members from across the political spectrum, and our political parties have always reflected this. The Global Right Alliance (GRA), as primarily a gameplay region, has been everything from an anarchy to a monarchy to a homegrown rotatorship. The region has had such governments because of its culture, which adores political intrigue and thrives on confrontation. With the increase of the region's population, many veterans have returned. It is the beginning of a new Global Right Alliance and a new government system. I know the forums can be quite intimidating; there's people who have been here for nearly a decade and have over 10,000 posts. However, we welcome new members and encourage them to get involved. If you want help finding your way around, we have resources to help you to get on your way. Getting Started If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features. |
| Democrats urge caution on claims against Iran | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Feb 12 2007, 11:52 AM (397 Views) | |
| Love and Honour | Feb 12 2007, 11:52 AM Post #1 |
|
Yes Sir; No Sir: 3 Bags Full Sir
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Write it up they did......WMD anyone? World Democrats urge caution on claims against Iran also Democrats wary over Iran claims |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| fighter4u | Feb 19 2007, 08:39 PM Post #21 |
|
our land is fill with blood may our people know only love.....
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1.Maybe if the saudis and the U.S aren't close friends.It a bussiness parntership. 2.Jivdom yes it will.The EU is on track with the ecomic and dolpimatic efforts to rule the world and if it wanted to it could be THE mritally power.It fact the thrid world terror(such as Hitler and Neoplioan(sp))is suppossed to come from the EU. 3.China is having many problems.The U.S internal problems have already destroy itself. And PI I was talking to jivdom as I was replying to his statements which said so. |
![]() |
|
| Jivdom | Feb 19 2007, 10:08 PM Post #22 |
|
Resident Insomniac
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I most certainly would not want to live in the USA but you can hardly say its internal problems have destoryed it? Hitler and Napolean both worked very hard to create a European superstate to be fair...
The UK was nice enough to cancel all investigations into Saudi corruption so we could sell them one of the most advanced airforces in the world all made up and ready... |
![]() |
|
| fighter4u | Feb 20 2007, 02:52 AM Post #23 |
|
our land is fill with blood may our people know only love.....
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
when I said destroy the U.S.I ment it chances of having any world empire. I mean that their soppose to be a third anti chirst that will led the Eu to takeover the world. Well the saudi did give billions to the oil companys Bush jr. use to be the CEO of.when those companys well on the verge of going under. |
![]() |
|
| Love and Honour | Feb 20 2007, 03:08 AM Post #24 |
|
Yes Sir; No Sir: 3 Bags Full Sir
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What total bollocks! OK who was the first and second anti-christ
|
![]() |
|
| Estion | Feb 20 2007, 06:23 AM Post #25 |
|
Persistent
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Who said anything about world empire??? Imperialism is a dead notion, and was always problematic in the US...suffice it to say, you Euros did it better than we did, but the Brits lost the whole fucking empire more than once, didn't they? Of course, the whole institution of imperialism is reprehensible, so why make the point? I suppose we could talk about cultural imperialism. The US certainly hasn't succumbed to any pressures on that front. Hell, you're all watching what we tell you to, eating what we tell you to, wearing what we tell you to, and listening to what we tell you to. I don't think that's what F4U had in mind, but his actual argument was no more cogent, so... |
![]() |
|
| VincentDantes | Feb 20 2007, 06:39 AM Post #26 |
|
Independant by Cynicism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You know what would solve every single problem in exsistance. I mean EVERY single problem..... ... Cmon think about it.. ...no its not put our guns down and smoking weed together ....although that could help ......no its not stopping global warming...cuz then we'd be cold. ....Still haven't guessed what the answer to every single problem is. NUKE IT!!! Yes' nuke the whole world, then nobody and nothing living will exist on it anymore except a couple of cockroaches and there won't be any problems. |
![]() |
|
| Oodge | Feb 20 2007, 08:41 AM Post #27 |
![]()
Nuckin Futs
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i usually think that exact same thought when i hear the name "Paris Hilton" the idea of anyone taking over the world is utterly impossible except aliens of course. they're more likely than an EU "Antechrist" by a long way |
![]() |
|
| Love and Honour | Feb 20 2007, 08:47 AM Post #28 |
|
Yes Sir; No Sir: 3 Bags Full Sir
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
EU Anti-Christ = Graham Norton
|
![]() |
|
| Dupitable | Feb 20 2007, 06:12 PM Post #29 |
![]()
How do you like THAT side boob?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I am sat here watching a Japanese program, I just ate A Cornish Pastey, all the clothes I am wearing were made in Britain or Nepal*, and I am listening to music currently by a german who died many years ago. Probably not the desire of US cultural imperialism. |
![]() |
|
| Jivdom | Feb 20 2007, 07:25 PM Post #30 |
|
Resident Insomniac
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hitler and Napolean?
Imperalism isnt dead. It's just moved to another plain. A world empire seems alittle beyond the realms of plausibility at present. Who knows what the futre will hold? Great empires come and go. The Brittish empire was just the most recent stain on history. |
![]() |
|
| fighter4u | Feb 21 2007, 12:04 AM Post #31 |
|
our land is fill with blood may our people know only love.....
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I didn't mean going around and shooting everybody. Instead I thinking puppets goverments and the whole CIA thing. I mean you may think that the CIA would go around creating terrors and toppling world governments. But if it make them stronger.Who to stop them.We already know Bush doesn't have any morals or any problems with breaking laws. The U.S internal problems?It congress at any chance strip it mirtally buget and try to do whatever to cut it funding. It people don't want to be in any war where they lose anybody. They due to their parniod are building fences around their boraders.Spenting BILLIONS on protecting themself from every Joe or Jane who has a bomb and a score to settle while their schools waste away,their health care does more harm then good and more and more people spent their days in povetry. And as for somebody taking over the world?Well I thinking of a terriost group really.Only larger.One that doesn't have to follow any rules or feed people or owe up to the UN.One that can bypass nation armys and navys and attack a nation heart. After all today the world modern armys are small and are desgin to fight terriost groups in the mountians of the Middle East. Not fight huge wars. People today won't want to sacfirce for some war. They want their SUVs and no draft and all that crap. all this terriost group has to do is bomb major locations. Sent people into a panic and destroy ports and and suft. It be quite easy to stop a army from becoming moblie. |
![]() |
|
| Pidgeon Island | Feb 21 2007, 12:08 AM Post #32 |
![]()
Not so stale.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh dear God. I could refute that in so many way it's just not worth it. |
![]() |
|
| Dupitable | Feb 21 2007, 02:07 AM Post #33 |
![]()
How do you like THAT side boob?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I suggest F4U looks up the size of the US, North Korean, chinese and Indian armys. |
![]() |
|
| Estion | Feb 21 2007, 04:37 AM Post #34 |
|
Persistent
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, first of all, you're presuming that it's a conscious, directed agenda, which it isn't. That aside, why is it that French and Canadian (to name a few) broadcasting systems require their affiliates to air a certain amount of "national" programming each week? Why is K-Mart bigger than the GNP of most European countries? Why is there a McDonalds in every major metropolis on the globe? Do you wear bluejeans (American invention)? Finding the exception that proves the rule doesn't disprove the rule. |
![]() |
|
| Oodge | Feb 22 2007, 12:21 PM Post #35 |
![]()
Nuckin Futs
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i agree. i had the exact same thoughts when i read
but when you think about its entirely true |
![]() |
|
| Jivdom | Feb 22 2007, 12:46 PM Post #36 |
|
Resident Insomniac
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It is in some ways... It's depressing how sheep-esque lots of people are. But America is not the only nation is that in many ways copied by the lots of others... |
![]() |
|
| Estion | Feb 22 2007, 05:31 PM Post #37 |
|
Persistent
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You're completely naive, and, as it happens, almost wholly incorrect, F4u. First of all, Congress has actually pussied out in a big way in terms of doing everything it might to scale back military funding in Iraq. Moreover, if you think legislative control over the waging of an unpopular and largely ineffectual war is somehow a bad thing, you might want to write to your own government representative and tell him to take an early retirement, 'cause you want the absolute monarchy back! Now, that first point doesn't make you an idiot (so much as just superficially informed) until you put it with the last one. Apparently, it's a problem for the US Congress to try at every turn to cut funding to Iraq, but also a problem to spend "BILLIONS" on national security. Incidentally, given the fact of terrorist strikes on Borneo, London, Madrid, so on, and so on, I can't say without equivocation that this isn't money well spent, particularly since the US defense budget is a far smaller portion of total government spending (about 20% in 2006) than it was during the 50s and 60s (about 60% of the total budget in 1956). Incidentally, if you want to look those figures up, check the US Statistical Abstract for those years. They're online, though I'm sure you won't bother. Let's examine just one more point, the one you make about the US not wanting to sustain heavy military casualties. I'm going to concede it right off the bat, and note that you haven't done anything to suggest that this is somehow a bad thing. God help us, we don't want our people to die! What a corrupt-at-its-core nation we are! I might note that Britain has (wisely, in my opinion) recently pussied out of Iraq, suggesting that we're not the only ones who don't want to see heavy military casualties. And, lest you think this phenomenon of some national character flaw rather than wise public policy shaped by public opinion, let me draw you to the Civil War as a valuable historic example. Since you're sure to deny each of my arguments by telling me how I'm suggesting something that appears nowhere in this post, however, I'll leave a discussion of that historical episode for next time. Keep on being an idiot, F4U. You'll get there someday...I guess. |
![]() |
|
| Dupitable | Feb 22 2007, 06:43 PM Post #38 |
![]()
How do you like THAT side boob?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I wasn't aware Britain had 'pussied' out of Iraq. Last time I checked (Last week when talking to a Armoured Corps Major) we were deploying two more armoured divisions over there.
1) I have no Idea what you are talking about 2) Because it is an ultra capitalist cormporation, the same reason that Virgin Corporation is bigger than the GDP of nearly 1/2 of the worlds countries 3)Same reason 4) No, and I think you will find them to be a French invention. They were just popularised in America in the late 19th century. |
![]() |
|
| Estion | Feb 22 2007, 06:58 PM Post #39 |
|
Persistent
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/22/world/mi....html?ref=world Eat it. |
![]() |
|
| Dupitable | Feb 22 2007, 08:15 PM Post #40 |
![]()
How do you like THAT side boob?
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hmm, yes. You have to read a little more into it than that. We are pulling inf batalions out because the Iraqis are pretty much ready to take their place. However, other types of troops (Air Corps and Armoured Corps etc) are increasing their numbers deployed because the Iraqis do not have the capability to effectively replace them. It's hardly pussying out. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today. Learn More · Sign-up Now |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · OMAHD Archives · Next Topic » |





![]](http://z3.ifrm.com/63/36/0/p14794/pip_r.png)







3:52 PM Jul 11