| Welcome to Hwl3. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Waiver Draft Talk | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 14 2010, 04:17 PM (295 Views) | |
| Fanpuck33 | Sep 25 2010, 07:20 AM Post #16 |
|
BACON
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Good. Now Brian or I won't have to do it. You missed the deadline, so you have no control of your list - you must do it based solely on your top 18 skaters and 2 goalies based on OA ranking. You won't even have to do any thinking! |
![]() |
|
| dlbalr | Sep 25 2010, 07:44 AM Post #17 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Having seen GM's once again willfully ignore the list deadline, I think some sort of deterrent needs to be put in place to the lazy GM's who can't be bothered to post their list despite having 3 weeks notice. Thus, I propose we adapt one of the following rules for next season: A: Teams who have an active GM and fail to post a list are prohibited from selecting players in the waiver draft but can still lose players; B: Teams who have an active GM and fail to post a list will be assigned the standard 18/2 by OA with the following add-on. The 18th skater protected by OA will become unprotected and is replaced by the lowest OA skater that must be protected. In some instances, that 18th skater can be an NHL'er or an elite AHL'er. I personally think A is the better option but B could have some merit as well. What say you? |
![]() |
|
| Fanpuck33 | Sep 25 2010, 07:47 AM Post #18 |
|
BACON
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I say both! |
![]() |
|
| jetsniper | Sep 25 2010, 07:58 AM Post #19 |
![]()
For Asgard!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I like A Both is good too but kinda harsh, lol |
![]() |
|
| nhfarber | Sep 25 2010, 11:16 AM Post #20 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What's the deal with Anaheim? People need time to scout his unprotected list.... |
![]() |
|
| Fanpuck33 | Sep 25 2010, 11:21 AM Post #21 |
|
BACON
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Don't bother, there's not gonna be anyone on it. I would have gone ahead and done his work for him otherwise. Since his unprotected players suck, I felt no need to do Alex's work for him. |
![]() |
|
| dlbalr | Sep 25 2010, 01:26 PM Post #22 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It has - teams had the option of listing the OA's or not if they so desired. If you read the instructions in the first post (also shown below), it does not say that OA must be listed as it has in years past. Some did anyways just for the heck of it. If we're being picky, you're supposed to list your 1st and 2nd drop players...just saying. ![]()
|
![]() |
|
| JoeLassister | Sep 25 2010, 01:27 PM Post #23 |
![]()
The Atlantic Owner
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
:lol: |
![]() |
|
| Fanpuck33 | Sep 25 2010, 02:27 PM Post #24 |
|
BACON
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And once again, Alex's lack of doing any work for himself is apparent. Instead of reading something for himself, he starts bitching about other people not following a rule that no longer exists. Well done! |
![]() |
|
| Psycing | Sep 26 2010, 01:18 PM Post #25 |
|
RAGING ALCOHOLIC
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Awww, there goes my buddy to MTL. |
![]() |
|
| blaze53 | Sep 26 2010, 01:48 PM Post #26 |
|
SEX MANIAC MMMMM!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I support Brian's new rules, I know I was kinda last minute (I always am) but this would be a suitable change and it means more free decent players lmao
|
![]() |
|
| dlbalr | Apr 5 2011, 12:07 PM Post #27 |
|
Advanced Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Bumping this since we never really had a resolution on it last season. The proposed rules would be affecting several teams* as it stands now. Thoughts, good, bad, too late to implement this year? *Teams who've still yet to post a list, several of which have been online enough to be more than aware of the deadline: Buffalo Detroit Minnesota Nashville San Jose Toronto (protected list done, not unprotected) |
![]() |
|
| Psycing | Apr 5 2011, 03:42 PM Post #28 |
|
RAGING ALCOHOLIC
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Option A seems very reasonable. |
![]() |
|
| EHIW | Apr 7 2011, 03:09 AM Post #29 |
![]()
Picture Above <3
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks Fanpuck, I got back at 1am this morning :S
Edited by EHIW, Apr 7 2011, 03:09 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Fanpuck33 | Apr 7 2011, 04:49 PM Post #30 |
|
BACON
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And still, even after I asked you to do it this afternoon, you didn't post a list. I definitely think Toronto should not be allowed to participate in the draft. |
![]() |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General HWL Talk · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)







5:45 PM Jul 10