WE HAVE MOVED. CLICK HERE TO ACCESS THE NEW FORUM!
Please note that this forum is now archived, and some links may not work. To access forums, please click on the text above the banner and NOT the banner itself. If you have any questions please contact CGJ
|
|
|
|
|
Claim your spot on the map Join the Regional Assembly Check out the Hall of Guidance Get involved in some Open Roleplays |
Time until The Independent Order's Fourth Birthday: |
Vice Chancellor: CGJ Premier: DaveIronside Vice Premier: SatanLord Minister for Home Affairs: Yolotan Minister for Foreign Affairs: Tama Speaker of the Assembly: Zee Lord Chief Justice: Achkaerin Roleplay Moderator: DaveIronside |
None Debates: Roleplay Realism Buff Act Request for an Inquiry into the use of mass-alts in the Z-Day episode |
| Welcome to the Independent Order Archive. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. If you previously had an account on the forum, then feel free to login. If you're new, please note we have moved to a new forum and have left this forum here to serve as an archive. |
| Request: Make legislation more accessible; Legislation needs to be laid out a bit better with order of seniority. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Topic Started: 19th March 2014 - 09:21 PM (70 Views) | ||
| Dretsyej | 19th March 2014 - 09:21 PM Post #1 | |
![]()
|
Speaker of the Senate, I have absolutely no idea whather I'm in the right place, but I would like to draw your attention to the Criminal Code (2013) Firstly I would like to ask why the ammended criminal code is below the original criminal code and not in fact above. Provided that the ammended criminal code is in fact enacted, should it not be at the top of the page for easy access? In theory I should not need to read the original, only the up to date criminal code. I would also like to ask for a table of contents. The reason for this is legislation, particularly in this case is lengthy and split down into multiple headers. I think that it would be ideal to have a table of contents to quickly access each one. I would also like to suggest at the end of each section that a ''back to top'' link be provided as a short cut to getting back to the contents (which may not in fact always be at the top of each page). Furthermore I would like to request that definitions are linked to directly as footnotes eg note[1] which would link to... 1. Note - Meaning an extract of text that is of some importance. For example. In the interests of clarification, I would like to ask how the clauses, sections...or paragraphs are referred to. Is an act an article? Or is an article the 1st level header? Are 1st Level headers sections or paragraphs? The reason I ask is that I would like to be consistent in how I refer to legislation. In the interests of accessibility I would like to ask that 1st level headers are given an increased size and that the text inside is indented so that we can clearly see where the breaks are between articles/sections in the text. I would like to point out that the heading above (15) is not in bold and from the look of the text should be. Could I also ask for an explanation of why the headers have not been numbered and instead each clause has been numbered? Typically in criminal codes that are divided into different sections the numbering is restarted again to reflect the clause that the article is referring to rather than the entire page on the whole. I appreciate your taking the time to read through my requests for changes and information. Kind Regards |
|
|
Safraen has fallen. ![]() Books & Guides: Are you new? Looking for Things to do? Want an accessible Comprehensive guide to Independent Order Law? | ||
| Tristantia | 19th March 2014 - 09:24 PM Post #2 | |
![]()
|
I second this. | |
![]() Up to infinity, bound by nothing but ourselves. | ||
| CGJ | 19th March 2014 - 10:49 PM Post #3 | |
![]()
Franz Kaufmann (1886-1944)
|
Dretsyej, Thanks for posting your feedback.
I would agree with this statement. I will discuss it with Elpidia when he returns. However, for now I have swapped the two of them around so that the amended text is first.
This would require a significant amount of BBCode work, make amendments difficult to manage and generally just make things difficult. Publishing it in PDF format, however, may be easier and more effective. Again, I will consult Elpidia. As for everything else, I believe we will require a public consultation regarding how laws are structured. Any changes to this Act, however, would have to come in the form of an amendment. Kind regards, CGJ Acting Speaker of the Senate |
|
| ||
| Dretsyej | 19th March 2014 - 10:58 PM Post #4 | |
![]()
|
Woo thanks Mr Speaker! Publishing in PDF or similar would be useful. If that's the case I would like to ask for consideration of a comprehensive e-book. Simply update the pdf as necessary formally on a monthly basis but also a nightly type of release as well or something? |
|
|
Safraen has fallen. ![]() Books & Guides: Are you new? Looking for Things to do? Want an accessible Comprehensive guide to Independent Order Law? | ||
| CGJ | 19th March 2014 - 11:06 PM Post #5 | |
![]()
Franz Kaufmann (1886-1944)
|
I'm not sure if people will have enough time to write nightly updates, but I'm sure publishing each Act in PDF format would be easily achievable. I'll write up a motion tomorrow or Friday to trial it with the new (and generally shorter) legislation. |
|
| ||
| Dretsyej | 19th March 2014 - 11:13 PM Post #6 | |
![]()
|
I may be up to compiling the stuff myself to be honest as a sort of external guide. We'll see. | |
|
Safraen has fallen. ![]() Books & Guides: Are you new? Looking for Things to do? Want an accessible Comprehensive guide to Independent Order Law? | ||
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | ||
| « Previous Topic · Office of the Speaker · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
^ 8:19 AM Jul 11
|
May the force be with you.





