Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Math for Smarty Pants Forums. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Graphing in multiple dimensions beyond 3?; Eh, comments?
Topic Started: Dec 3 2006, 02:41 AM (810 Views)
KRK
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Well, it was something I pondered when I was bored. How do you graph things in the fourth, fifth, ect... dimensions. I first looked at how you got at a graph for the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd dimensions. You bisected nothing with a line for a 1-d graph. A single vertical(or horiontal) line. For 2-d, there are 2 lines, one going up, another to the side. You bisect the intersection point of the first two lines( 0,0 ) to get a 3-d graph in which you have 3 factors(0,0,0). Now comes the problem. You need a new factor, but there is no more space to expand. Why? There are only 3 geometric dimensions-Length, width, and depth(height). So, you can't expand the graph dimensions, but you can expand the amount of quadrants. For instance, there are 2 quadrants(or 1) for the 1st dimension, 4 for 2-d. 8 for 3-d. And, to get each new dimension, you bisected the 0 point. So, you now must make a diagonal cut the on the center. Imagine a cube placed straight up on one of its edges and cut down vertically. Now, do the same horizontally and you have 16 quadrants but still only 3 coordinate points for each point. 3 because of only 3 geometric dimensions. Therefore, the new quadrants represent other dimensions(like space and time). So, keep performing the cuts to create new quadrants.

Thoughts on this?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Admin
Member Avatar
Administrator
Admin
This goes in General Mathematics....MOVED

Okay. So, where to begin.

I'll ponder this for a bit, and post something later.
Posted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
appu_xavier
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
What, what?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KRK
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Read it until you get it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Edwardted
Member Avatar
Twin Prime Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Um..... you just do
You cannot win without losing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KRK
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Do what?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Edwardted
Member Avatar
Twin Prime Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
graph in multiple dimensions
You cannot win without losing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KRK
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Well, Mr. Williams showed be simple graphing for imaginaries.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Edwardted
Member Avatar
Twin Prime Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
isnt it like normal graphin
You cannot win without losing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
vwilliams
Mathematician
Admin
After four dimensions it becomes pretty much abstract but K actually has a reasonable 3D representation. But keep in mind it's just a 3D model of something that we can't imagine.

W
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
appu_xavier
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
It's Majik!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Edwardted
Member Avatar
Twin Prime Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Magic is when Xavier spells stuff correctly.
You cannot win without losing.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
appu_xavier
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
I did that on purpose, you moron.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
KRK
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
There are no morons on the MFSP website.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
appu_xavier
Member Avatar
Poincaré Conjecture
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Except Edward. Ted.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Mathematics · Next Topic »
Add Reply