Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
| Dark Lord Sauron Gothmog Jaimbern |
![]() "One ring to rule them all". |
Mordor NS Discord Chat Channel |
| News: |
| Greetings, and welcome to Mordor. We hope you enjoy your visit. At the moment you are viewing our forum as guest. This means much of the forum is hidden to you and you are unable to use many of the features. To be able to post in forum and apply for citizenship you must register an account with your nation name. Once you have done that you can apply for citizenship and get the appropriate access to the whole forum! So what are you waiting for? Join our community! If you require diplomatic status as an envoy from another region, apply for diplomatic status here |
| Same-sex marriage | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Dec 18 2012, 04:07 PM (513 Views) | |
| Cacti | Dec 18 2012, 04:07 PM Post #1 |
|
What is your opinion on same-sex marriage? Are you for it? Against it? Do you not really care either way? Are you happy how your countries government treats the situation? Are you yourself married to someone of the same gender? Discuss. |
![]() |
|
| Tadin | Dec 18 2012, 04:14 PM Post #2 |
![]()
Haradrim
|
I'm for gay marriage. I am gay myself. It seems absurd to me that this is even a debate. It's probably because I live in a very liberal city. The best compromise is to divorce marriage all together from the government and leave it a religious institution. Then, have the government issue civil unions to everyone who wants legally recognized benefits and rights. |
![]() |
|
| Alancar | Dec 18 2012, 04:25 PM Post #3 |
|
I'm a magical princess from another dimension
|
|
![]() |
|
| Minister of Technologies Turrepture | Dec 19 2012, 02:27 AM Post #4 |
![]()
Adorkable Sentry
|
I'm all for LGBT rights. They're human rights, in my opinion. |
![]() |
|
| Sian | Dec 19 2012, 10:11 AM Post #5 |
![]()
|
I'm so happy for the people in the states that can now get married in certain places, not all the states sure but it's getting there! I fully believe that everyone has the right to be recognised equally and not segregated. Marriage is ultimately a word, and no institution should claim ownership. By institution I mean like, a man and woman - if that makes sense? |
![]() |
|
| Akkadian Assyria | Dec 22 2012, 11:54 PM Post #6 |
![]()
will molest your parents for laughs
|
Well it doesn't hurt anyone so I don't understand why it's illegal in so many areas |
![]() |
|
| Beian | Dec 23 2012, 02:03 AM Post #7 |
Loving Leader of Best Country
|
Well, homo-sexuals are people too (Unlike Alanclar) and deserve the same rights as anybody else. It's like saying Black people should be slaves, or by saving women shouldn't be able to vote. But most people have outgrown those prejudices.... |
![]() |
|
| Cacti | Dec 26 2012, 01:34 PM Post #8 |
|
It's just the latest stage of completing human rights and making people equal. It's hard to believe that only a hundred years a go you only had full rights if you were a heterosexual white man. Over time we had women's rights added, rights for ethnic people added, some gay rights such as it becoming legal added, but it's still not completed the gay rights as they can't marry etc (depending where you live of course). It's a shame and disgrace that there are still parts of the world where women and people of different skin colour are still treated like second class citizens. |
![]() |
|
| Jahmurai | Dec 26 2012, 01:40 PM Post #9 |
![]()
Azog Soulreaver
|
There are many unlogical reasons why people argue/use violence... This is one of those reasons... |
![]() |
|
| Hellhound | Jan 18 2013, 10:43 PM Post #10 |
![]()
Warg
|
Against. I believe Marriage is a Sacred union between a man and a woman. Call me what you will, that's my belief. |
![]() |
|
| Tadin | Jan 18 2013, 11:01 PM Post #11 |
![]()
Haradrim
|
My middle ground compromise to you, Hellbound would be, what if we separated "marriage" in the legal sense from "marriage" in the religious sense. This "religious marriage" would not carry any legal benefits, but would be completely celebrated within your religion. It could even hold a ban on same-sex marriage if their religion compels it. Then, we could have a "civil marriage", which would be entirely secular and only recognized by the government and available to all. It would come along with all the legal benefits, without any religious strings attached. If you are a heterosexual couple, you can have both. If you are homosexual, you are only entitled to one, but that one comes with all the legal benefits you would need in your union. |
![]() |
|
| Alancar | Jan 18 2013, 11:12 PM Post #12 |
|
I'm a magical princess from another dimension
|
That is not a compromise Tadin. The separation that you talk about already exists. For example, the catholic church doesn't recognize divorce. That's why you can only marry once and as far as they are concerned you stay like that until either you or your spouse dies. But obviously the state recognizes divorce and second marriage. It is a common misconception that legalizing gay marriage means churches have to recognize it. That is not the case. Churches have the discretion to marry whomever they please, using whatever standards they want, even if they conflict with those of the govermnent. The catholic church not marrying divorcees would be one example of that. Edited by Alancar, Jan 18 2013, 11:21 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Tadin | Jan 18 2013, 11:36 PM Post #13 |
![]()
Haradrim
|
That's a good point. So if this separation already exists, then I assume then all we have to do is extend the rights of marriage in the eyes of the law to same sex couples and we will have this happy median that I outlined above. That will be a solution we all can swallow, right? If this is already how it is structured and the debate still rages, then I assume not. The argument against gay marriage cannot be that religious freedom is being infringed. The argument becomes that they are showing disapproval for an act of government that they consider to be immoral and against their religion. Well, that's a nice little opinion for them to hold and it certainly is their right to do so. For those of us who live in the US and many other places in the Western World, the secular government that we have would say, "yeah, so what if your religion says that?" I would ask those against gay marriage if they can construct a justification for banning gay marriage that is legally sound that does not use religion to justify it. |
![]() |
|
| Hellhound | Jan 19 2013, 12:41 AM Post #14 |
![]()
Warg
|
The 'compromise' is in the form of Civil Unions. And while I cannot approve of homosexuality, it is not my place to judge. And I will not use "religion" to brow-beat anybody. |
![]() |
|
| Tadin | Jan 19 2013, 12:50 AM Post #15 |
![]()
Haradrim
|
So, it really comes down to the title of the union that is the sticking point? |
![]() |
|
| Hellhound | Jan 19 2013, 12:52 AM Post #16 |
![]()
Warg
|
Not for me, personally. I don't think either are right. |
![]() |
|
| Tadin | Jan 19 2013, 03:38 AM Post #17 |
![]()
Haradrim
|
Meaning that you don't think that either heterosexual or homosexual relationships are right? Or you mean that neither civil union or marriage for same-sex couples are right? |
![]() |
|
| Hellhound | Jan 19 2013, 03:51 AM Post #18 |
![]()
Warg
|
My personal belief is neither civil union, or same-sex marriage are right. |
![]() |
|
| Tadin | Jan 19 2013, 03:57 AM Post #19 |
![]()
Haradrim
|
Is there any reason why if a civil marriage in the eyes of the law or a civil union neither infringe upon your religious convictions? I'm trying to understand what underlying values bring you to this conclusion. |
![]() |
|
| Hellhound | Jan 19 2013, 03:59 AM Post #20 |
![]()
Warg
|
The fact that I believe homosexuality to be sin. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
7:04 PM Jul 11
|
Theme created by Sjaelen Auren from Zathyus Networks Resources














7:04 PM Jul 11