| Welcome to Near Ft. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Potential RP Idea | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 20 2013, 05:14 AM (307 Views) | |
| Wandering Argonians | Oct 20 2013, 05:14 AM Post #1 |
|
Depending on the particulars we decide on for the backdrop for NEAR, I have an idea that has been nagging at me for some time now that I would like to try and implement. It is set around the search for some artifact of immense power and unfathomable age, with the power to do something truly amazing. What exactly it is and does will be in tune with the universe backstory, and in the end the item will likely have to be destroyed to keep one race from becoming the only race to be able to do the one cool thing the object does. The adventure is the journey, not the prize, right? As this item is mythological in power and status, legitimate governments and galactic powers will very likely shun this item as a fairy tale and laugh at any attempts to lobby them to recover it. Hence, it will fall to the rogues, treasure hunters, adventurers, scientists, and the like of our individual races and societies to track this item down. This can be done individually, or as a group effort. It is even possible to deploy a single ship with a diverse crew and use the opportunity to showcase and portray the unique culture of your species and how it interacts and clashes with your allies, however uneasy that alliance might be due to past histories between individuals or whole cultures. The core concept of this RP is very malleable and can be twisted to suit any number of differing scenarios depending on who is involved and how they came to be involved. The only 'rule' I'd like to enforce is that no species field a fleet to track this item down. It's simply unlikely that any legitimate government would make the personnel and material commitment to hunt down what is quite likely simply a legend. I would like to take it as far as banning government backed military forces as well, but they can be allowed within reason. For example a scout team is embedded with an explorer unit or a government agent from an agency that doesn't exist includes himself somehow on your science vessel; but I'd prefer this to be a civilian-fronted effort for the most part. They're welcome to have shiny toys and high-end tech, within reason, but no overt or grand governmental backing beyond the promise of a victory parade after their triumphant return. We must keep things interesting for the players as well as the readers, and always having the exact tool on hand makes for boring story telling. For those of you groaning at the lack of epic fleet combat, there is always the possibility of going to war over the fragments or data or what-have-you that remains after the item's destructions the end of the RP. Any interest? If there's none here I'll likely troll NS as well. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Wandering Argonians | Nov 12 2013, 05:56 PM Post #21 |
|
What other sites are you working with? You have my vote for the new ap, btw. |
![]() |
|
| Hobbeebia | Nov 13 2013, 02:28 PM Post #22 |
![]()
Administrator
|
ImprobableIsland.com , http://roleplaycoloholics.com, and other RP sites |
![]() |
|
| Wandering Argonians | Nov 14 2013, 08:17 PM Post #23 |
|
Would you mind terribly to PM them to me? I would like to explore other options. Also, this story concept is well-suited to those non-affiliated players we're discussing on the 'shout' board.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Story Boarding Center · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
12:22 AM Jul 11
|







12:22 AM Jul 11