|
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Restarting the Nuclear talks | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 15 2014, 10:59 PM (241 Views) | |
| 10ebbor10 | Jun 15 2014, 10:59 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Minister Mohammad Zarif Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamic Republic The Islamic Republic of Iran makes a public call for all parties to return to the negotiation table to bring a final end to the embargo against Iran. The embargo, whose legality is very questionable, has no relevance to the Nuclear issue, and is destabilizing for the entire region. The Islamic Republic of Iran firmly believes that an agreement can be reached, following the standards as defined in the Joint plan of action. An earlier trust building agreement would be beneficial as well. Iran is proposing the following as a trust building measure.
OOC
|
![]() |
|
| Avner | Jun 16 2014, 12:05 PM Post #2 |
|
Ze'ev Elkin Deputy Foreign Minister for the State of Israel The State of Israel is wary of these new proposals made by Iran. Israel will continue to demand a guaranteed timetable for cessation of all uranium enrichment by Iran, the removal of all enriched uranium, and the dismantlement of the underground facility at Fordo. We wholeheartedly will push for continued IAEA monitoring on Iranian nuclear sites, that is a precondition that is non-negotiable. However if this is a stance of good faith on part by the Iranian leadership, the Israeli government cautiously welcomes it. |
![]() |
|
| iceviking | Jun 17 2014, 09:47 AM Post #3 |
|
![]() Frank-Walter Steinmeier Federal Minister for Foreign Affairs Germany is willing to restart these talks. We see that the only way forward is to talk. |
![]() |
|
| Nuked | Jun 17 2014, 12:02 PM Post #4 |
![]()
|
Mikhail Bogdanov Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Russia would like to see a restart to these talks as well. We believe that the Iranian proposition is an excellent starting point for negotiations. |
![]() |
|
| Eryk | Jun 17 2014, 12:24 PM Post #5 |
|
СССР
|
United States Secretary of State As mentioned repeatedly, including in the summit which did not succeed in extending the Geneva agreement, the United States is committed to removing sanctions upon Iran should it be ensured that its nuclear program is exclusively peaceful. We are therefore willing to move forward with talks in order to achieve a more lasting agreement and settle this issue. |
![]() |
|
| Avner | Jun 17 2014, 12:48 PM Post #6 |
|
Ze'ev Elkin Deputy Foreign Minister for the State of Israel Again I warn and stress the importance that Iran obey preconditions before any further sanctions are removed, inspectors must continue to be part of any nuclear deal...which Iran failed to put in their agreed action proposal. |
![]() |
|
| 10ebbor10 | Jun 18 2014, 12:00 AM Post #7 |
![]()
|
Minister Mohammad Zarif Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamic Republic Iran must note, that as was included in the previous agreement, we will not accept any agreement that seeks to infringe on our rights under the NPT. As such, a complete ban of enrichment, or a complete removal of all enriched Nuclear material are all non negotiable. A temporary suspension of enrichment, temporary limits on the storage of nuclear material of certain enrichment, or a temporary extension of the IAEA mandate in Iran are acceptable, provided they remain within reason and do not seek to damage Iran or the Iranian people. We must inquire if the current proposal for a new Joint plan of action is acceptable, so that talks can resume. |
![]() |
|
| Avner | Jun 24 2014, 03:58 PM Post #8 |
|
Ze'ev Elkin Deputy Foreign Minister for the State of Israel The Israeli government believes in a permanent IAEA mandate until a new agreement can be signed. Should Iran's nuclear energy program be entirely peaceful, why then, amidst growing international criticism and increasing pressure by the United Nations Security Council does Iran simply not open the doors fully to IAEA and international inspections? The State of Israel can support A temporary suspension of enrichment and temporary limits on the storage of nuclear material of certain enrichment however IAEA inspection like I have stated before is non negotiable. If Iran has nothing to hide they would open up the doors to inspectors however all we have seen is brief and non-helpful steps that Tehran has taken to sustain their nuclear program. Inspection is in no way harming Iran or the Iranian people as Mr. Zarif stated. |
![]() |
|
| 10ebbor10 | Jun 29 2014, 09:50 AM Post #9 |
![]()
|
Minister Mohammad Zarif Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Islamic Republic The IAEA has access to Iran's enrichment and other nuclear facilities, as defined under Iran's ascension and ratification of the NPT. We see however no reason that this treaty should also allow unconditional access to confidential military facilities with no relation, of any kind, to Iran's nuclear power program. We think that the current system, with inventory verifications, verified planned inspections, and other measures defined under the NPT is more than sufficient. Exceeding this mandate based on political pressure unfounded by actual arguments threatens the IAEA's status as an independent institute, endangering it's core goal, to ensure the availability of Nuclear technology for all while preventing Nuclear arms proliferation. |
![]() |
|
| Eryk | Jun 29 2014, 01:45 PM Post #10 |
|
СССР
|
United States Secretary of State It is not our intention to see these talks gridlocked once more; however if Iran insists that these military facilities have absolutely nothing to do with its nuclear program, why is it unwilling to allow IAEA inspectors to confirm this? This would be a standard and simple procedure, and if the allegations would prove unfounded, Iran would only benefit from the added trust we put in its words. At this point in time, there is no such trust as I'm sure all sides will acknowledge, prompting us in particular to be skeptical of Iran's commitments. This point would however be rendered moot if the IAEA would produce a report confirming unequivocally that Iran is not developing a nuclear weapon, and is not retaining the means which would allow it to do so. All other commitments by Iran would be acceptable in order to move forward in as quick of a pace as possible. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Round 4 · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2










9:05 AM Jul 13
