|
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| The Future of the CIS and the Formation of the Eurasian Economic Union | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 5 2014, 03:59 PM (275 Views) | |
| Bobithy | Aug 5 2014, 03:59 PM Post #1 |
|
Great Leader of the Korean People
|
Sergei Lebedev Executive Secretary of the Commonwealth of Independent States Esteemed members of the Commonwealth of Independent States, I have called this meeting to discuss the future of the organization and its members. For many years it has been the opinion of not only Moscow, but also Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan that the formation of a new economic organization outside of the current auspices of the CIS and Eurasian Economic Community would be beneficial to all those involved. At the same time the CIS has begun to become a redundant organization and whos job is being done by various other organization inefficiently, but all technically linked to the CIS. This proposal we shall discuss today would disband the CIS as an organization and in its place create the Eurasian Economic Union and the Collective Security Treaty Organization as successor organizations, in tern linked under the one umbrella of the Eurasian Union. Gentlemen, this new Eurasian Union would be much more efficient than the many small organization that currently exist, would create an environment where nations such as Russia, Kazakhstan, and Belarus could assist the developing countries and thus bringing all members of the Eurasian Union to a state of economic prosperity. Lastly the new EAU would provide security for all of its states in the event of terrorist attacks, illegal insurgency, and foreign invasion. This would allow the entire Eurasian region to ensure its own safety and stability, something I am certain we can all strive for. The new organization would have two councils: one would be heads of state and their economic ministers, known as the EAU Cooperation Council. This would be responsible for economic investment through the organization, requests for economic assistance, as well as political discussion, cooperation, and mediation for disputes in order to avoid conflict and continue to maintain and grow our regions stability. The second council would be the EAU Security Council made up of the defense ministers of each member state and would be in charge of organizational funding, training, deployment, and operation of the EAU's joint security missions, peacekeeping missions, and the like. Each state would be required to pay into the security fund based on their GDP, and Moscow would be willing to include that all EAU members recieve strong discounts on military hardware as well as free trainers and advisors to ensure the Eurasian Union has strong, modern, and well coordinated security forces. Now I know there will be some concerns, so let me explain what I know is coming: Every member state will maintain its complete sovereignty. This is a security and cooperation organization; not a country. The EAU Cooperation Council would not be allowed to interfere with independent member states foreign policy, domestic policy, economic policy, ect. The Cooperation Council would be able to make suggestions on policy to ensure cooperation but there is no obligation to follow this policy. In addition, all members are given a single vote in each council with a rotating Presidency for the Cooperation Council and Secretary for the Security Council. It will take majority votes to pass normal decisions which can include funding, assignment packages, the formation of peacekeeping forces, ect. More dramatic decisions including the changing of the constitution will require a two-thirds vote by Cooperation Council. As for the security part of the agreement, the Eurasian Union will act as a mutual defense agreement, ensuring the safety of all member states through cooperative and mutual defense. The continued operation of foreign military bases and the opening of new foreign bases (non member states) on the soil of member states would need a majority vote in the Security Council. This is to show the world self-sufficiency and a willingness to work together in a united effort, and make sure about the safety of our nations. I now open the floor for questions, comments, and concerns. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Bobithy | Aug 11 2014, 03:01 PM Post #11 |
|
Great Leader of the Korean People
|
Sergei Lebedev Executive Secretary of the Commonwealth of Independent States In regards to the budget of the EAU, the Russian Federation proposes the following: Economic Investment and Growth Stimulation Budget: 45% Sustainable Growth Budget (Natural Resources): 10% Security and Counter Terrorism: 25% Emergency Aid Reserve Budget: 7% Administrative Budget: 3% In regards to the annual budget allocation each country will receive the following percentage of each of the first three budgets. The remaining two will be kept to pay for needed administrative fee's and to have an emergency reserve. The allocation of funds will be given based on need for development and expectation of projects being created by the country, including projects that country will be funding in other member countries: Russia: 40% Armenia: 9% Belarus: 10% Kazakhstan: 10% Kyrgyzstan: 6% Tajikistan: 7% Turkmenistan: 9% Uzbekistan: 9% The granting of higher percentages to Russia, Belarus, and Kazakhstan include their ability to provide that funding to other developments in other member state's and not just within their own borders. |
![]() |
|
| Jos1311 | Aug 13 2014, 10:54 AM Post #12 |
![]()
Head Admin
|
The average contribution of each party will be around 0.25% of GDP. The administration cost most likely will be somewhere between 10-15% of the entire budget, as the contributions are relatively low. Most economies are also rather dependent on natural resources and have therefore requested a larger portion to be allocated towards this element. As a result of this a more likely proposal would be: Economic Investment and Growth Stimulation Budget: 35% Security and Counter Terrorism: 20% Sustainable Growth Budget (Natural Resources): 15% Emergency Aid Reserve Budget: 10% Administrative Budget: 10% In regards to the annual budget allocation each country will receive the following percentage of each of the first three budgets. The remaining two will be kept to pay for needed administrative fee's and to have an emergency reserve. The allocation of funds will be given based on need for development and expectation of projects being created by the country, including projects that country will be funding in other member countries: Russia: 39.00% Armenia: 4.00% Belarus: 15.00% Kazakhstan: 12.50% Kyrgyzstan: 2.40% Tajikistan: 3.60% Turkmenistan: 9.00% Uzbekistan: 14.50% |
![]() |
|
| Bobithy | Aug 13 2014, 04:50 PM Post #13 |
|
Great Leader of the Korean People
|
Sergei Lebedev Executive Secretary of the Commonwealth of Independent States We approve of the modified proposals for budget and allocation. We would like to see the member states sign onto this new organization, and sign the agreement declaring the Eurasian Union as the successor to the CIS, CSTO, and their affiliated organizations. |
![]() |
|
| Jos1311 | Aug 14 2014, 04:26 AM Post #14 |
![]()
Head Admin
|
Approved, could you please write some kind of article on this? If not, I will deal with it, but than it will most likely take some time. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Round 4 · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2






8:58 AM Jul 13
