|
| A Resolution on the Iran-Iraq Conflict; To address the growing sectarian crisis in the Persian Gulf | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jun 5 2016, 08:24 AM (487 Views) | |
| Jai | Jun 5 2016, 08:24 AM Post #1 |
|
Jai Pharaoh | King of the Nile
|
United States Ambassador to the UN Esteemed colleagues - In light of recent and troubling events concerning the security and stability of the Persian Gulf region; and the conclusion of the Versailles peace talks - which my government commends our French counterparts for their wiliness to facilitate such talks; It has become abundantly necessary for the international community to intervene on behalf of the Iranian and Iraqi people, in particular, and for overall regional security. The United States can not accept the current course of this conflict, and my government has charged this body with organizing a cohesive, and deliberate response to the growing crisis. That said, the Versailles conference has provided this body with it's formal recommendation, and the United States feel that all avenues toward peace should be considered. I, thus, propose the following Resolution for the purpose of consideration, and discussion.
Edited by Jai, Jun 5 2016, 08:26 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Bobithy | Jun 5 2016, 11:11 AM Post #2 |
|
Great Leader of the Korean People
|
Peter Florin Permanent Ambassador to the United Nations of the German Democratic Republic The German Democratic Republic has a couple major concerns with this proposed resolution. The first being that we find it highly unlikely that a 5,000 man force will be able to effectively maintain a border as large as that between Iran and Iraq. Secondly we do not have a copy of the Treaty outlined in the resolution; thus we are unsure where this Demilitarized Zone is to be. We would like to see a map showing where said zone would be; as well as an expanded peacekeeping force, before supporting this resolution. |
![]() |
|
| Jai | Jun 5 2016, 08:46 PM Post #3 |
|
Jai Pharaoh | King of the Nile
|
United States Ambassador to the UN These valid concerns are appreciated by the United States - allow me to present the details in question, for consideration. Colleagues, the Treaty of Versailles:
And, DMZ map for use of this council:
|
![]() |
|
| winisle | Jun 6 2016, 07:52 AM Post #4 |
![]()
|
Harold D. Anderson Australian Ambassador to the United Nations It is good to see that both parties in the Iran-Iraq war is willing to negotiate and we are in general, positive to the proposed Resoultion, but, must echo the concerns from the East German ambassador. 5,000 soldiers will not be enough to cover the lenght of the border. Furthermore, we must insist on the resolution being a stated Chapter VII resolution, and that it contains rules and stipulations on the rights of the UN force. On such would most certainly being that neither side is allowed heavy weapons within the DMZ, for the security of the UN forces there. Furthermore, the Treaty of Versaille does not contain a roadmap towards a lasting peace, it is merely a cease-fire agreement with some trustbuilding addons. We would like to see the basis for a roadmap towards a lasting peace between the nations. Unless these goals are meet, I have been informed by the Ministry of Defence that it would be considered to dangerous to deploy Australian forces to the UNMISSA. |
![]() |
|
| Bobithy | Jun 6 2016, 08:33 AM Post #5 |
|
Great Leader of the Korean People
|
Peter Florin Permanent Ambassador to the United Nations of the German Democratic Republic After reviewing the Treaty of Versailles the German Democratic Republic would like to propose the following draft resolution, based heavily on the resolution presented by the honorable delegate from the United States. This draft will cover our concerns; but may not cover all the concerns of all members so we welcome suggestions for modifications and amendments.
|
![]() |
|
| winisle | Jun 6 2016, 08:38 AM Post #6 |
![]()
|
Harold D. Anderson Australian Ambassador to the United Nations Australia finds the resolution proposed by the East German Ambassador to be well crafted and thought out, and would be more than happy to support it. |
![]() |
|
| Shadows | Jun 6 2016, 02:41 PM Post #7 |
![]()
|
Ambassador and Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations The French government approves of this draft, and supports it in moving forward. We will also be willing to dispatch a Mechanized Infantry Regiment to take part in the peacekeeping mission. |
![]() |
|
| Bobithy | Jun 6 2016, 02:52 PM Post #8 |
|
Great Leader of the Korean People
|
Peter Florin Permanent Ambassador to the United Nations of the German Democratic Republic In light of the support shown by members of this council, the German Democratic Republic calls for this to move to voting bloc. We hope to receive a second shortly. |
![]() |
|
| Jai | Jun 6 2016, 03:58 PM Post #9 |
|
Jai Pharaoh | King of the Nile
|
United States Ambassador to the UN The United States seconds the motion to bring this exceptionally drafted resolution to a vote, as soon as possible. |
![]() |
|
| C.E | Jun 7 2016, 01:29 AM Post #10 |
![]()
|
Comrade Yuri Vladimirovich Dubinin |Soviet Representative to the United Nations Security Council. The Soviet Union can support the proposed resolution and thus thirds the motion for proceeding to a voting session. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Round 7 · Next Topic » |












12:16 AM Jul 11
