| Welcome to Natural Hazards Forum. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Fossil find challenges tree of life as we know it | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 13 Dec 2012, 01:03 AM (25 Views) | |
| skibboy | 13 Dec 2012, 01:03 AM Post #1 |
|
12 DECEMBER 2012 Fossil find challenges tree of life as we know it ![]() Pacific moon jellyfish swim in an aquarium at the Schonbrunn zoo, in Vienna, on July 3, 2012. Organisms long thought to have been the ancestors of early marine creatures such as jellyfish and worms, may in fact have lived on land, said a fossil study Wednesday that may prompt an overhaul of the tree of animal life. AFP - Organisms long thought to have been the ancestors of early marine creatures may in fact have lived on land, said a fossil study Wednesday that may prompt an overhaul of the tree of animal life. If correct, the finding could challenge the commonly held theory that life had thrived in the oceans for hundreds of millions of years before spreading to land. The fossils, dubbed Ediacaran and dated to 542-635 million years ago, were unearthed in south Australia in 1946, and were long thought to have been the remains of jellyfish, worms and flowery seafloor-dwelling creatures known as sea pens. Now a geological scientist from the University of Oregon, using state-of-the-art chemical and microscopic analysis techniques, has concluded the fossils more likely belonged to land-dwelling organisms and were not animals at all. They may have been lichen -- a composite of a fungus and an algae or bacteria -- or colonies of micro-organisms. "The discovery has implications for the tree of life because it removes Ediacaran fossils from the ancestry of animals," said Gregory Retallack, author of the study published in the journal Nature. The fossils represent "an independent evolutionary radiation of life on land that preceded by at least 20 million years the Cambrian evolutionary explosion of animals in the sea," he wrote. Retallack added this did not mean that all Ediacaran fossils everywhere were terrestrial. If his theory is correct, it would indicate that some organisms mastered the transition from marine to non-marine life much earlier than currently thought, Paul Knauth of Arizona State University's School of Earth and Space Exploration wrote in a comment on the report. It may even "support the possibility that the transition went the other way". In a separate comment, Shuhai Xiao of the Virginia Tech department of geosciences called the proposition dubious, and stressed it "would represent a fundamental change in our picture of evolution". "The evidence is unconvincing," Xiao wrote. Source:
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Science & Nature · Next Topic » |








3:24 PM Jul 11