Welcome Guest
[Log In]
[Register]
Regional InformationWelcome to Osiris! Please endorse the Pharaoh: Altino and the Council of Guardians for the security of Osiris. Your next step should be registering a forum account and applying for citizenship. You should also check out our regional chat and say hello! Check out our regional guide for information on regional government and a listing of government officers. Citizens, be sure to get involved in the Council of Scribes to discuss and vote on legislation and other important regional matters! |
| [Passed] Securing Nuclear Materials From Dastardly Menaces | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Dec 12 2016, 11:10 AM (189 Views) | |
| Auralia | Dec 12 2016, 11:10 AM Post #1 |
|
Securing Nuclear Materials From Dastardly Menaces A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets. Category: International Security | Strength: Mild | Proposed by: [nation]Imperium Anglorum[/nation] Affirming the right of member nations to possess nuclear weapons and to use them in the case that they are attacked by hostile forces, Concerned that there does not yet exist any legislation to protect the manufacture of nuclear weapons from being banned by the World Assembly, Observing that there are more than six times more non-WA nations than member nations and believing that such protections are necessary for the security of member nations, This august World Assembly hereby: Maintains the right of member nations to manufacture and trade nuclear weapons or reactors, to possess the materials required in such manufacture, and to acquire the materials required in such manufacture; Maintains the right of member nations to have knowledge of the manufacture and trade of nuclear weapons or reactors, to possess such knowledge, and to acquire such knowledge; Mandates that member nations take all practical actions to safeguard the manufacture and knowledge spoken of in the first two clauses from the wrong hands, especially those which conspire against the stability of member nations; and Directs the Nuclear Energy Safety Commission (NESC) to ensure that nuclear materials and knowledge are secured from the wrong hands by providing funds and assistance to nations which are unable to defend their own nuclear knowledge and technology. Edited by Auralia, Dec 12 2016, 11:11 AM.
|
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Auralia | Dec 12 2016, 11:10 AM Post #2 |
|
Summary: This resolution is essentially the Nuclear Arms Possession Act on steroids. NAPA recognizes the right of World Assembly member states to possess nuclear weapons. This resolution goes further and recognizes the right of member states to manufacture and trade nuclear weapons or reactors and the knowledge and materials required for constructing them. The resolution also requires member states to prevent nuclear knowledge and materials from falling into "the wrong hands" and directs the Nuclear Energy Safety Commission to assist member states in doing so. Recommendation: AGAINST Analysis: In the real world, it is commonly recognized that certain states cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons, either because they will misuse them or because they will not secure them properly (due to instability, economic problems, underdeveloped technology, etc.), allowing violent non-state actors to steal and misuse them. Moreover, there is always the possibility for misuse, even in more stable member states with well-secured weapons. Nuclear weapons -- by their very existence -- simply make the world less safe, which is why nuclear non-proliferation is such an important foreign policy goal in real life. Of course, it can still be argued that it is important for some states to maintain access to nuclear weapons as a deterrent. The Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty linked above recognizes five UN member states with access to nuclear weapons, and Auralia maintains a nuclear weapons arsenal IC. However, I do not think it is responsible for the World Assembly to adopt a policy that enables and promotes the construction of nuclear weapons by all member states. The resolution's attempt to secure nuclear technology from "the wrong hands" is admirable, but should be fleshed out and done in a separate resolution that does not guarantee the right of every rogue state to procure nuclear weapons. Edited by Auralia, Dec 12 2016, 11:39 AM.
|
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Sygian | Dec 12 2016, 11:35 AM Post #3 |
![]()
Baron of Koptos
|
Against. |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Dr_PelIcaN | Dec 12 2016, 11:38 AM Post #4 |
|
For |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Syberis | Dec 12 2016, 11:42 AM Post #5 |
![]()
|
For |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Transdavisia | Dec 12 2016, 12:23 PM Post #6 |
![]()
|
For |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| The Great Wall of Mexico | Dec 12 2016, 12:29 PM Post #7 |
![]()
Donald Trump Lite
|
Against |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| LexerMercs | Dec 12 2016, 01:00 PM Post #8 |
|
Against |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Adytus | Dec 12 2016, 03:48 PM Post #9 |
![]()
Baron of Buhen
|
Against |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Der Angreifer | Dec 12 2016, 06:24 PM Post #10 |
![]()
|
Against. |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Treize Dreizehn | Dec 12 2016, 08:09 PM Post #11 |
|
For. The importance of ensuring the right of WA Nations to own nuclear weapons cannot be understated. The above examination by Auralia leans heavily on real world laws, but of course the WA isn't the real world. The primary issue with leaving open the possibility of a WA resolution that bans nuclear weapons is that not all nations are *in* the WA. Therefore they would not be bound by such a resolution. This, instead, ensures that no such resolution can ever come about. Furthermore, the basic language used in promoting the securing of nuclear weapons is a step above what we currently have, and new resolutions can cover anything the piece at vote has missed. This is an important piece of legislation and frankly I'd like to see it pass. Edited by Treize Dreizehn, Dec 12 2016, 08:11 PM.
|
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Cormac | Dec 12 2016, 10:22 PM Post #12 |
![]()
OFO Co-Founder
|
If it's good enough for Treize and Auralia, it's good enough for me. For. |
| Online Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Auralia | Dec 14 2016, 01:16 AM Post #13 |
|
Just to clarify, my recommendation is against. :P |
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| Sygian | Dec 16 2016, 11:07 AM Post #14 |
![]()
Baron of Koptos
|
|
| Offline Profile | Quote ▲ |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Shrine of Amun · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic | ⌚ 3:46 AM Jul 11 |






