- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Proposal: Pardesi notAfrica NPCs | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Mar 21 2014, 02:46 PM (815 Views) | |
| Ulthrannia | Mar 21 2014, 02:46 PM Post #1 |
|
So, after some thinking on the matter and a single not-so-serious conversation that transpired on the IRC, I believe that the region should have some notAfrica NPCs. The reason for this, in my mind at the very least, is that it would be adding a new dynamic to the current politic landscape in the region as well as adding some nations that are not so developed. Now, I already have a few ideas swirling in my head but I wanted to check with the region if you would also be interested in having some notAfrica NPCs on the map. This will be a discussion thread where we can pitch ideas and how we could get this developed. - Ulthrannia |
![]() |
|
| Rodarion | Mar 21 2014, 02:58 PM Post #2 |
|
I say aye, if we can have Ayrab NPCs, we must have bleck NPCs |
![]() |
|
| Premislyd | Mar 21 2014, 03:08 PM Post #3 |
|
They'll end up like the Middle East NPCs (being puppets of CDI nations or Tehraan). Plus dat precious map space. |
![]() |
|
| Ulthrannia | Mar 21 2014, 03:18 PM Post #4 |
|
Issue 1: That issue popped up during the first conversation and it is a valid concern, but keep in mind that I hope to not have the Africa NPCs turn into puppets of CDI or Tehraan. Issue 2: There is plenty of space, don't stress yourself on the matter. |
![]() |
|
| Virana | Mar 21 2014, 04:10 PM Post #5 |
![]()
Emmeria
|
I'm a bit concerned about map space as well. I mean, the entire point of adding the new continents was to have a wealth of space for future growth. Covering that space with NPCs would be counterproductive, especially since Africa is largely irrelevant to major international affairs. If we do decide to add the NPCs, then African ones are a natural choice. But as I said, African NPCs don't provide a massive shift in the region's geopolitical landscape, especially when compared to, say, the Middle East (all dat oil doe). |
![]() |
|
| New Belhavia | Mar 21 2014, 04:42 PM Post #6 |
|
I agree with the points that Virana and Prem brought up - I think the NPCs will become solemnly-used puppets that'll waste space for new Pardesi members. I don't endorse this proposition. |
![]() |
|
| Ulthrannia | Mar 21 2014, 04:52 PM Post #7 |
|
I put high faith in the membership of this region that they will create new entities that will add diversity to the region, new roleplaying opportunities and a new landscape to explore without creating a new Middle East of puppets. But if that is your views, so be it. Edited by Ulthrannia, Mar 21 2014, 04:57 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Tarsas | Mar 23 2014, 09:31 AM Post #8 |
|
I am not opposed to a few new npcs provided they are planned very well. I think one continent where we can have some post colonial nations might be good and provide more stories. I would insist we give these to non cdi nations to rp. |
![]() |
|
| Rodarion | Mar 24 2014, 02:48 PM Post #9 |
|
This worry about map space is legit but, there is always the option of making them the size of masara or the not UEAthings, like 12 pixels a piece |
![]() |
|
| Belfras | Apr 9 2014, 02:18 PM Post #10 |
|
I support this idea. Provided it's executed appropriately, of course. Do you have any on-paper proposals to show us at this point, Ulth? We'll have a full vote once all the concerns are on the table and addressed. Or not addressed, however you take this Ulth. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · National Info · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Theme: Zeta Original | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
9:30 AM Jul 11
|







9:30 AM Jul 11