Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you will be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you are already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
Should Cyber Dragon be Limited?
Topic Started: Nov 17 2005, 10:50 AM (792 Views)
TopDecking Samurai
Member Avatar
BANKAI

Ok a lot of nOObs that cant get a Cyber Dragon are crying again that Cyber Dragon is to powerful and that it needs to be limited. I think that its fine the way it is I use 2 in my deck and I dont see the big deal sure its the best TopDeck in the game or is it Blade Knight? Now that I think about it Blade Knight is better sometimes but anyways what do you guys think should Cyber Dragon be limited?

X-Box Live: Espada Muerta

Posted Image

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Indignation
No Avatar
Ancient Duelist
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Beest topdeck monster could be cybernetic cyclopian.

Cyber Dragon DOES NOT need to be limited. Stop crying over this card! It is not CED or BL to the fricken S! It is definatly beatable and it barely causes good players any trouble. Stop complaining and adapt to it! I am sick of hearing crap over decent/good non broken cards! It's just like when phoenix came out, everyone wanted it banned.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kakashi
No Avatar
Frogger
[ *  * ]
TopDecking Samurai
Nov 17 2005, 10:50 AM
Ok a lot of nOObs that cant >GET< a Cyber Dragon are crying again that Cyber Dragon is to powerful and that it needs to be limited. I think that its fine the way it is I use 2 in my deck and I dont see the big deal sure its the best TopDeck in the game or is it Blade Knight? Now that I think about it Blade Knight is better sometimes but anyways what do you guys think should Cyber Dragon be limited?

OMFG I love you TDS I was just about the create a topic like this but beware long rant from me awaits in this post so its time for Kakashi's Noble Rant against n00bs bad talking Cyber Dragon :kakashi:

WoW first off I like to state that Cyber Dragin is my fav... XD

As you can see in the qoute I have come too see this alot in really good playable cards that ppl that don't own them complain until either they themselves get the card or Konami\UDE shuts them up by restricting it.

Cyber Dragon is a really good card in a really bad format just think this format is Aggro dominated and CD is the perfect Aggro card for the Aggro friendly format. Last format for the whole 1 month I got to run CD in the Goat Control dominated meta it was pointless with 3x Goats 3x TER , Tsuku + NoC , Mirror Force, and the unholy BLS I found CD as a quick way to Balter with the amazing 3x Morphs thata it not a threat at all but I still loved it XD. Then came this miss hardly any protection from Aggro we had not 3x BoM ( because of Mill ) no 3x Goats ( Goat Control ) and the biggest slap in my face the rebanning of a card my dear friend gave to me Mirror Force now the n00bs that complain that there BEWD ccouldn't attack with goats or TER in the way can now.

Unlike other Broken cards like BLS, Duo etc Cyber Dragons effect on the meta relies on the how good the list is, If its a Aggro format like this **** feast then of course CD will be good but if it was more of a Control format like the April 1st bans then CD will see less dramatic play thats simple.

Cyber Dragon isn't as powerfull as ppl think it is. Its easy to counter and when you think hard about its like a Captain is usual goes you to over extend yourself leading you to no hand then to topdecking that is way I just play CD noy another card unless CD gets Sak,Armored or BTH and I need the protection. Another thing this card is a horrible topdeck if you have perfect field advantage over you're opponent then it collects dust in your hand and even if you bring it out your opponent will most like have something to defend with like a Sak,Armored or BTH but still a good card like BK to come back with. Like I say on Pojo if you can't defend against Cyber Dragon then you FAIL at life... Period.

The support in SOI is more news to be concern of, Not to worry about Cyber Laser 0r Barrier but that annoying Proto Cyber Dragon now with it you don't need the other CDs to fusion summon CTD or CyED so Konami\UDE has found the way around CDs importants in there fusions so now of they WANT TOO they can restrict but IMHO it doesn't need to be restricted because like I stated in my 3rd paragraph.

" Cyber Dragon doesn't make the Meta, The Meta makes Cyber Dragon ''

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
pimpn hippie
Member Avatar
Tobi's a Good Boy
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
cyber dragon may be powerful but not worth limiting.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Aeto
No Avatar
"I reject your reality and substitute my own"
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Meh. I dislike Cyber Dragon, but I find ways around it. If anything, it should be CED that is limited (Yes, I have faced two in a duel once) but not Cyber Dragons, they aren't THAT powerful. SOI, I think, won't even make Cyber Dragons broken.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Twisted.Angel
Member Avatar
Elite Duelist
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
No it should not. Here are a few reasons why I like and dislike cyber dragon.

Likes:
IT OWNS
it is an amazing topdeck
owns n00bs with powerbond w00tits cool

dislikes:
Art sucks
Made us get rid of limiter because of that brokenness

The FallenAngel has spoken.
Posted Image
/Sig by the Angel/

AngelicInspiration
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TopDecking Samurai
Member Avatar
BANKAI

Good so no one here thinks it should be limited but with that new card it might be!

X-Box Live: Espada Muerta

Posted Image

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
drgray
Member Avatar
Say no to Hillary 2 Office/Order
[ *  *  *  * ]
I dont run 1... I own cyber dragon..

:*: :*: :*: :*: :*: :*:
Posted ImagePosted Image
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
User#27
No Avatar
Intermediate Duelist
[ *  *  * ]
... It's clearly overpowered but so are lots of other cards that won't be banned soon.

So of course it should be banned but it won't be and that's not a big deal.

Limiting would do very little. Limiting to 2 would change more or less nothing and limiting to 1 would turn it into a staple just like it did to BoM and Scapegoat.

Not worth doing.
Posted on pojo by "dudewendy". Just don't ask.


dudewendy
 

A Yugioh Song
one day i saw some chesse
and i said give me painful choise please
if i dont get it ill roar
and later have soar
then wanted gyphon wing
got it and ill sing
then said to heck with it give me some bling-bling
no wait wheres that dragon card
and to find it was hard
to spend more $ i bought some lard
and then i wanted jinzo
got it from linzo
changed my mind got a knife
got my wife
and left
found a cleft
AND WENT ON MY WAY

the end
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
TopDecking Samurai
Member Avatar
BANKAI

User#27
Nov 17 2005, 11:54 PM
... It's clearly overpowered but so are lots of other cards that won't be banned soon.

So of course it should be banned but it won't be and that's not a big deal.

Limiting would do very little. Limiting to 2 would change more or less nothing and limiting to 1 would turn it into a staple just like it did to BoM and Scapegoat.

Not worth doing.

True most people run two at the most so it wont change much and if you limit him to one than every deck will run it, its that simple.

X-Box Live: Espada Muerta

Posted Image

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
~Dante~
Member Avatar
(insert witty comment)
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
There are no staples, but I'm not going to get into that now.

This Proto CD card is just an excuse Konami/UDE tp limit CD because a lot of n00bs complain about it either being hard to get, or to damn broken. These few "balanced" cards are crap, good players can do without them, I don't know about you guys, but I was doing just fine before any of them came along. Man, these new sets piss me right off, giving substitution cards that can be ran in 3s to rich n00bs just because they hate Advance soley for the reason that they can't run Monster Reborn, or Change of Heart is a bad idea. Though some may not see it, that's what those cards are.

There are cards that should be limited, then there are cards that shouldn't, NoC is a perfect example of something that shouldn't be limited as it enforces strategic thinking from the player that likes his F/Ds, I can see semi-limited. Then there are cards that should be limited, like Spirit Reper, that thing laughs at the time limit set in official tournaments, there is nothing more annoying than going against a n00b who just sets Reaper and waits after you've played Confiscation or something so you're at lower LP. The worst argument is, I'm thinking about my move, how many times have I heard that.

Which brings me to something else that bothers me, the Gods aren't on the Ban List, this would save so many people, so much time explaining to little kids that you can't use them in a duel. Same with any card that can't be played.

Umm, what else, oh yeah, CD should not go onto the limited list, that'd just be stupid, it's easy enough to get past, it's just that friggin little n00blets are to stupid to think of a way.

Short and sweet, my answer is no.
Can't be bothered...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xxshadowxx2
Member Avatar
~*Hounoured User*~
[ *  *  * ]
lol, what would happen to all the stupid people who fuse 3 cyber dragons with polymerization?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Vincent K
Member Avatar
Guess who's back?
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Wow. If they limited it, Power Bond would be useless because you couldn't use it to bring out Cyber End Dragon.

Anyways, I don't like Cyber Dragon and I don't hate it either. The first time I played a guy who had three Cyber Dragons in his deck, I used Bottomless on two of them. They're good, but they aren't that good, so there is no reason to limit it.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Aaron_the_archsage
Member Avatar
Prepare to get Utterly P-W-N-E-D
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
I think Cyber dragon should be limited to 2.
Posted Image
Which FF Character Are You?

http://tn3-2.deviantart.com/fs9/300W/i/200...ilver_sashi.jpg
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Kay19
Member Avatar
Advanced Duelist
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
To make it clean and simple, I don't think they should limited Cyber Dragon just yet, since Proto Cyber Dragon hasn't come yet. :kasensei:
Posted Image

Posted Image
^
Thanks to Top Decking Girl
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Fully Featured & Customizable Free Forums
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3

Acid Haven created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR