| We hope you enjoy your visit. You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you will be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you are already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Should Cyber Dragon be Limited? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 17 2005, 10:50 AM (793 Views) | |
| Manjyome | Dec 28 2005, 01:10 PM Post #16 |
![]()
Superb Duelist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not till Proto cause for those with out Cyber Stein you cant make CED |
| |
![]() |
|
| jaykingtrunsdale | Dec 28 2005, 02:06 PM Post #17 |
Teh LeeT Pwner
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I suppose American meta is tottaly dif from over here as cyber drgaon is so broken its a + 1 ans ssoemtiems even a +2 if you have a nother monster it allows monsters like don and spirit reaper to played easily. i have 3 cyber dragons but choose not o play them unless necessary yeah thaty a rea gr8 card but a bit oo great as its becoming over here what it was when bls was out same deck over and over again with the only difference probabbly being someone added a bottomless . Yea well thats my penny for the jar
|
| (>'.')> (^'.')> <('.'^) <('.'< ) | |
![]() |
|
| Dice Roller | Dec 28 2005, 04:09 PM Post #18 |
![]()
Heartless ArchAngel
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No dont limit it, with all the 1900+ atk 4 star monsters out there, theres no need. I think you can still use 2 cyber dragons and a The Light- Hex Sealed Fusion to get Cyber End Dragon The Light- Hex Sealed Fusion, subsitutes 1 fusion material for a light fusion monster and has a built in Polymerization. |
Deck 1: Archfiends Deck 2: Gravekeepers (the one who started dueling online here ;D ) | |
![]() |
|
| Indignation | Dec 28 2005, 04:28 PM Post #19 |
Ancient Duelist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think that the best thing they could do would be to give it an errata. The effect should be:
Then we do not have to complain as much.
|
![]() |
|
| Dark Scorpion | Dec 28 2005, 07:29 PM Post #20 |
![]()
-9th Seat Shinigami-
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Not that it really matters if it gets banned/restricted. All they're doing is limiting the topdecking posibilities. Proto-Cyber Dragon will be out soon, so that can somewhat make up for the lack in Cyber Dragon, if it were to be banned/restricted. The only thing missing is that it is weaker and can't be special summoned the same way. |
![]() 'Hoka tells you, "Remember, badgers make good hats."' | |
![]() |
|
| King Sephiroth | Feb 8 2006, 03:46 PM Post #21 |
1 pWn n00bS!1!11!!1!!!111!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This card shouldn't even become anywhere close to being banned. The card is perfectly fine right now. People only want it to be banned when their opponent pull's a god-hand on them and says their moves almost robotically: "MST, Cyber Dragon, Nobleman, Reaper, GG". =\ |
King Gogeta/King Sephiroth of TopTier~Pojo~YGOParadie ~DBZCardgame![]() ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~~*::Zombie Build Credentials::*~Game's: 34-17Match's: 16-3Tourney Win's: 2/5 ~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
| |
![]() |
|
| DRT | Feb 18 2006, 06:08 PM Post #22 |
The Divine Duelist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I got to say cyber dragon is probally one of my favorite cards even if i dont have any ive had a lot of opputunities to get it and i never have a lot of trouble against it but people should quit complaining true its a great topdecker but its no mobuis or BLS i think maybe semi limited but not limited
|
![]() |
|
| £Sabaku SouSou£ | Feb 18 2006, 06:42 PM Post #23 |
|
#1 Playeh
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree with Manjyome, when Proto comes it should be at least semi-limited, preferrably limited, because then it'll still be possible to play the Fusion Dragons without Cyber. I think it was just a metagame breaker, plus it made all of my fav. cards obsolete! (Airknight, Vampire, etc.) |
| <span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'>ELDER SCROLLS IIII: OBLIVION</span> | |
![]() |
|
| Dr. Philip & Mr. Fiend | Feb 18 2006, 06:53 PM Post #24 |
![]()
The Last Gunslinger Mod
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree with most of the other people here. It shouldn't be limited... at least not yet although the future may be different. The card is good but still it is not extremely broken. Like others have said, its BLS or CED. Those cards deserve to be banned because of how easily they can swing the duels. Cyber Dragon can't do that every time it is played. There are still enough ways to get rid of them. |
The Last Gunslinger![]() Credit to Iceman I was born Six-gun in hand, behind a gun I'll make my final stand. -Bad Company | |
![]() |
|
| Dark Necrophia | Mar 13 2006, 10:02 PM Post #25 |
Duelist in Training
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes, it should be restricted. |
![]() |
|
| Nightdragon | Mar 14 2006, 11:06 AM Post #26 |
An'ya Tatsu
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think it should be Semi-Limited... |
![]() Go Forward. You Must Go Forward. Don't Go Back. Retreat And You Will Age. Hesitate And You Will Die. SHOUT MY NAME IS ZANGETSU! ![]() ![]() ![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| elearu | Mar 14 2006, 12:06 PM Post #27 |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Anyone who thinks Cyber Dragon needs limiting or banning, needs to stop playing this game. If you can't deal with 2100 attak monster, that's just sad. |
![]() |
|
| Kai Hiwatari | Mar 14 2006, 04:51 PM Post #28 |
|
The Charismatic Enigma
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree with Aurora. They are so easy to get out and get rid of. I mean I usually get one out and then next turn it is usually Smashing Ground or Fissured. |
![]() Thanks to chaosmage and Kuznetsov for my Sig and Avy. | |
![]() |
|
| Flame Champion | Mar 14 2006, 05:13 PM Post #29 |
![]()
Legendary
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i think what people worry about most is how easy it is to get out cyber end dragon. which reallyt has nothing to do with cyber dragon itself. on a lighter note, iit isn't all that game breaking. sure it's convenient, but so are most tributes comsidering how rarely you tribute you own monster... meh. it definitely doesn't need restricting. |
| |
![]() |
|
| DarkKuriboh | Aug 10 2006, 09:58 AM Post #30 |
|
Duelist in Training
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Hmm cyber Dragon i used them in a deck once but with proto cybers aswell. If played right they can be very useful but they are very easy to get passed with simple cards like MF,Sak,TT and magical cylindars. Ive only ever one 1 once otked sum one with them and it was my first and only otk. Limiting will do nothing. removing will jsut piss people off. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:15 PM Jul 11
|
Acid Haven created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR






![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)

















1:15 PM Jul 11