Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
We hope you enjoy your visit.


You are currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you will be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you are already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3
~Dante~ did write a final article for DHQ; I found this in a folder on our computer
Topic Started: Aug 18 2006, 02:30 AM (891 Views)
Side Step
No Avatar
l e g E N D.
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
~Dante~
Sep 2 2006, 08:18 PM
My argument with Sorcerer being banned has nothing to do with whether I like it or not, In fact I never said anything about liking it. I protested the banning of it because it was a balanced card that was only banned due to the number of people using it. In all honesty I like Sorcerer about as much as I like BLS-E or CED-E.

Believe it or not there are people who defend things they dislike, but then again maybe that prospect is a little to complicated for your miniscule brain to comprehend @ R A M P.

Defending what you dislike is contradicting yourself. It's like saying you have to do something, but you don't have to do something.

Or, for example; I hate apples. Hypothetically, because in reality, I love them. Now then, I hate apples, and my elder tells me that I have to eat them. Then, he/she tells me I don't have to eat them.

Your entire article makes ZERO sense, seeing as how you're "defending what you dislike." That's completely useless, and a waste of time. So, my question to you, is why would you waste time? Time is nothing to **** with. There is never enough of it, because it fly's so fast.

I'm right, you're wrong. You're beating around the bush with petty arguments to defend what is in the wrong.

Bottom Line.
A i M : In A Laundry Rm
"I pity the fool who doesn't call 1-800 COLLECT."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
~Dante~
Member Avatar
(insert witty comment)
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
@ R a m p
Sep 2 2006, 07:05 PM
~Dante~
Sep 2 2006, 08:18 PM
My argument with Sorcerer being banned has nothing to do with whether I like it or not, In fact I never said anything about liking it.  I protested the banning of it because it was a balanced card that was only banned due to the number of people using it.  In all honesty I like Sorcerer about as much as I like BLS-E or CED-E.

Believe it or not there are people who defend things they dislike, but then again maybe that prospect is a little to complicated for your miniscule brain to comprehend @ R A M P.

Defending what you dislike is contradicting yourself. It's like saying you have to do something, but you don't have to do something.

Or, for example; I hate apples. Hypothetically, because in reality, I love them. Now then, I hate apples, and my elder tells me that I have to eat them. Then, he/she tells me I don't have to eat them.

Your entire article makes ZERO sense, seeing as how you're "defending what you dislike." That's completely useless, and a waste of time. So, my question to you, is why would you waste time? Time is nothing to **** with. There is never enough of it, because it fly's so fast.

I'm right, you're wrong. You're beating around the bush with petty arguments to defend what is in the wrong.

Bottom Line.

I have yet to see you come up with an argument other than "It's stupid to defend what you dislike." If you were to write an article about the exact same topic, you'd probably sing the praises of Konami for banning Sorcerer. I assume that because you seem like the type of person who doesn't like to stray from the group mindset because you don't want to have to defend your opinions.

Look, my point is, that if Sorcerer was good enough to be banned, then it would've been banned along with the other chaos monsters. I'm just saying in this article that a lot of people using it doesn't justify banning it.

Oh, and I'd be fine with you calling my views wrong IF you had a way to prove that they actually were wrong. Instead you've only made yourself look like an idiot but continously saying "I'm right you're wrong" and nothing more.

All in all, unless you can prove my opinions wrong with solid points, then shut the hell up because I'm not interested in arguing with a self centered, egotistical idiot with the mental capacity of a four year old.
Can't be bothered...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Yu-Gi-Oh! Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 3

Acid Haven created by Sarah & Delirium of the ZNR