| Welcome to Tulon. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Honorable Combat Agreement; This was fun to write | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: 6 May 2014, 11:44 PM (147 Views) | |
| Tenenza | 6 May 2014, 11:44 PM Post #1 |
|
The Honorable
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Honorable Combat Agreement A resolution to improve world security by boosting police and military budgets. Category: International Security Strength: Mild Description: For the Purposes of this Resolution: "Champion Warfare" is to be definied as any combat between a limited number of Military Personal, the outcome of which will determine the outcome of conflict. AWARE that Champion Warfare has fallen into decline due various factors UNDERSTANDING that a major fallacy in Champion Warfare is the lack of certainly that both sides will agree to accept the outcome of the duel ACKNOWLEDGEING that Champion Warfare enables conflicts to be settled via military means without significant casualties and collateral damage REMARKING that the practice of Champion Warfare also promotes an increased standard of living for soldiers BELIEVING that Champion Warfare additionally promotes national solidarity by further enabling heroic and noble portrayals of Warfare. CONVINCED that the proliferation of Champion Warfare will increase international security UNDERSTANDING that Champion Warfare is not a practice that some states are willing to make use of SEEKING therefore to reach a compromise that promotes Champion Warfare without forcing it onto unwilling nations; The General Assembly, REQUIRES that all Duels of Champion Warfare that are approved by both member states involved be honored. ENCOURAGES states to consider the use of Champion Warfare Spoiler: click to toggle Spoiler: click to toggle Yes, I know it's a weird quirky Proposal, but I think that it's actually fairly reasonable. So what do you think? Edited by Tenenza, 11 May 2014, 04:24 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Deneclia | 6 May 2014, 11:57 PM Post #2 |
|
Emperor of the Internets
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nice proposal, but I doubt that anyone would vote for. |
![]() |
|
| Cardoness | 7 May 2014, 12:31 AM Post #3 |
|
Noble
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It is without a doubt unique. I rather like it but it needs some work. You acknowledge several issues and problems with Champion Warfare but have a week MANDATES clause. How is the mutual agreement to be enforced (and keep in mind the WA can't have an army, peacekeepers, police, ect.)? That section needs to be expanded. Also consider adding "fluff" such as "Encourages nations to do X, Urges nations to do Y, ect. Also needs a category strength, I recommend Mild. Edit: It should be noted that it will have a hard time passing, but most proposals do. Many ambassadors will think this is a joke proposal, but if handled right (and I'm already forming a plan) it can be kept from being laughed out of the room. Passing, well, it all comes down to the right TG campaign. Edited by Cardoness, 7 May 2014, 12:33 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Tenenza | 7 May 2014, 01:38 AM Post #4 |
|
The Honorable
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The issue of enforcement is a hard one. I went with Mandates because it seemed less forceful then Requires, but it's effectively the same, in that the World Assembly can't actually force member states into complying with it. But the larger issue I'm working on is how to make this proposal seem actually important. I'm currently going with simply adding fluff regarding how the proposal's passage will encourage more nations to use Chamption Warfare, but theres a bit of a arguementative fallacy in there. |
![]() |
|
| Deneclia | 7 May 2014, 02:25 AM Post #5 |
|
Emperor of the Internets
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Wondering: what could be the different kind of duels ? |
![]() |
|
| Tenenza | 7 May 2014, 02:36 AM Post #6 |
|
The Honorable
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Amusing idea of a man with a sling dueling a Stealth bomber. |
![]() |
|
| Tenenza | 7 May 2014, 08:44 PM Post #7 |
|
The Honorable
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Tightened somethings up. Still trying to figure out a good way to impliment enforcement. |
![]() |
|
| Tenenza | 11 May 2014, 04:25 PM Post #8 |
|
The Honorable
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Added an additional line. I'm still stumped on how I can improve the enforcement. |
![]() |
|
| Mantura | 15 May 2014, 02:43 PM Post #9 |
|
Comrade
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Has this been proposed? |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · WAGA Drafting Room · Next Topic » |
| Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
1:03 AM Jul 11
|
Theme by James... of the ZBTZ and themeszetaboards.com





![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



1:03 AM Jul 11