| Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Labour joins the immigration bandwagon | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 18 2014, 11:30 PM (1,578 Views) | |
| AndyK | Nov 18 2014, 11:30 PM Post #1 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2839327/Labour-ban-jobless-EU-migrants-claiming-benefits-TWO-YEARS-plan-curb-welfare-tourism.html#ixzz3JRL8mAIO Lets remind ourselves what the previous rhetoric was. ![]() |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Deleted User | Nov 24 2014, 04:31 PM Post #121 |
|
Deleted User
|
I can help you there too. I have met East Europeans who claim they have business qualifications, were trained to be Chemists, quite a few proclaimed motor mechanics , one ex soldier and a drug dealer. Some are wives of men who come to ply their trade in another industry, others are couples who come over to find work together ( some leaving their children behind). In fact their is quite a mix. However most of them are young and young people will be more willing to upsticks and rough it for a few years if it is worthwhile. My drug dealing friend told me that in his country you either are the working poor or you steal. He chose to leave , work and sell drugs and contraband. Good worker he was. I trusted him too. We often are given a foreign ' assistant' who has virtually no English. Also you are correct that their work possibilities are limited. They are offered zero hours contracts and do not have to fired, we just have to not want them anymore. The agencies bully them too. |
|
|
| marybrown | Nov 24 2014, 04:45 PM Post #122 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm glad..may not make Britain seem such a good deal.. Maybe they will bugger off somewhere else! |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 24 2014, 04:48 PM Post #123 |
|
Deleted User
|
The agencies ( in my experience) are run by East Europeans. |
|
|
| Deleted User | Nov 25 2014, 11:12 AM Post #124 |
|
Deleted User
|
In my experience a high proportion of the better educated Scandinavians and North Europeans speak very good English, in particular Norwegians, Danes and Dutch. This has little to do with England per se and more to do with the English language being the commercial language of the world, due in great part to Britains prior colonialism and the influence of the USA. I remember many years ago being in Oslo on business and caught a bus which I subsequently feared was going in the wrong direction. I turned to the middle aged lady behind me and asked if she spoke English. With a degree of surprise nin her voice she responded 'Of course!' In our ensuing brief conversation I realised she spoke it rather better than some British people I had come across. Sadly fluent English does not yet seem to be an immigration criteria although of course it should be. |
|
|
| Heinrich | Nov 25 2014, 11:17 AM Post #125 |
|
Regular Guy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No EU citizen is required to speak Danish in order to migrate to Denmark. Such a requirement would be as illegal as Arizona requiring a US citizen to speak English to live in Phoenix. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 26 2014, 03:25 PM Post #126 |
|
Deleted User
|
Many things which were once illegal have with changing circumstances and perceptions become legal. Fluent English should be a legal requirement for any immigrant coming here to the UK to live and work. Equally every child attending a non-fee paying state school should expect to be taught in English as a first language, any public sector interviews or notifications should be in English and the necessity for any translation or translator should be paid for by the individual requiring this service. In cases where the individual is unable to pay the government of their country of origin should be required to undertake to pay. There is no justification for the British taxpayer being required to pay for such support for immigrants. |
|
|
| RJD | Nov 26 2014, 04:37 PM Post #127 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The problem is that locals have for years been opting for soft subjects and most science and technology university courses have been sustained by foreign students. This is particularly difficult for Universities that undertake research as they cannot find sufficient locals to take on a PhD. The has been a shortage of skilled technologists throughout the recent recession and as we have seen these people have managed, because of demand, to keep wages in line or above inflation. Educated, skilled workers and capital are doing well in the 21st C., the major problem we have is the massive surfeit of poorly educated and unskilled labour right across the Planet. Politicians have been aware of this impending problem for a decade or more, but have no solutions on offer. Increasing productivity rates further will only make the plight of the unskilled even harder. Best make sure that your nearest and dearest invest all efforts into obtaining a good education and skills as the situation will get worse not better. Not only that the situation is compounded by global competition which is pressing down on profit margins which eventually moderate wages and tax revenues. Unfortunately for us Brown pumped up the size of the State, hence it's cost and ongoing liabilities at exactly the wrong time. Had he just been prudent. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 26 2014, 04:41 PM Post #128 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I see no reason, other than learning a foreign language, for any lessons in England to be taught in anything other than English. It is the responsibility of parents to ensure their kids have a sufficient facility with the English language prior to attending English schools. This is also true for Wales, but we have to put up with the massive disadvantage to pupils of having far too many lessons in Welsh. |
![]() |
|
| C-too | Nov 26 2014, 05:07 PM Post #129 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Firstly, skilled men in this country have never been appreciated. I worked as a skilled man for 30 years, I have travelled England Scotland and Wales as a service engineer for a number of years. I think probably because I was based in the North West I never received a wage that would allow me to have anything like a reasonable standard of living. It was only when I retrained into a professional position and enjoyed a good salary plus excellent working conditions that I began to feel appreciated by the system. One of the things required for improving education is a belief in the future by those being educated. Through no fault of their own, too many families have never had that belief. You can use your hindsight to condemn Brown, but he was caught in the right-wing trap of Deregulation, Financial Services, Free Market Economy, that made helping the families at the bottom of the economic pile a necessity. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 26 2014, 05:48 PM Post #130 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Best let Brown make his own excuses he is a big boy Politician and does not require self appointed white-washers of the truth. Brown was beyond his level of competence, it showed and we are now paying a huge price. It did not need to be such. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Nov 26 2014, 06:09 PM Post #131 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It was perhaps 'unfortunate' (or rather disastrous) that the state of public services (include the police and police moral) were so deflated in 1997 that some reflation was required - the term "in crisis" being the generally accepted true position. However in %GDP terms (= affordability) the state took less, borrowed less, and spent less than the previous government. Oh; and the size of the Private sector increased by more than the public sector did. Privatising public sector services may alter the relative size of each, energy, rail, water, and many NHS provisions being examles, but it does not equate to a reduction in the costs to tax payers of these services - which I suggest should be real aim of government. I think the most significant statistic we can look at for what was truly happening is the fact that councils (include Tory run councils) were increasing taxes at an inflationary rate (>50% in some cases), and were never in danger of being either removed from office or denied the increased incomes. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 26 2014, 06:20 PM Post #132 |
|
Deleted User
|
He had thirteen years as either Chancellor or Prime Minister in a Labour government, which throughout this period had a substantial majority, in which to do something about any 'right wing trap' whether imagined or real. That he failed to do so is illustration enough of his woeful shortcomings. Do others smell a whiff of hypocrisy from posts such as this from C-too with regard to his routine whinging about the failures of the present government, who have had a mere four and a half years to undo all the damage they inherited, not the thirteen years available to Labour? I certainly do! |
|
|
| RJD | Nov 27 2014, 09:05 AM Post #133 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It is very easy to blame Politicians for one not meeting ones expectations. I have known many skilled people over the decades rise up and take commanding positions. I noted that most of UK industry, post 1979, appeared to be under the control of Working Class Grammar school boys done good. I was born into the poverty of the Working Classes and never ever experienced a class barrier placed to stop career progression. Most of these so called impedimenta are in the minds of those looking for excuses, someone else to blame. The gamble in life cannot be removed by Politicians and it is best that individuals recognise that they, with some effort and determination, can fashion their futures. A life fashioned by Politicians from cradle to grave is abhorrent, is the dream of latter day Marxists and will not come to pass. Best be pragmatic. |
![]() |
|
| disgruntled porker | Nov 27 2014, 10:16 AM Post #134 |
|
Older than most people think I am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Much of that is true ReJ. I'm not so sure about the concept of being born into poverty because you are working class though. Mind you, much of the arguement revolves around what the individual perceives as "working class". Edited by disgruntled porker, Nov 27 2014, 10:19 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| disgruntled porker | Nov 27 2014, 10:17 AM Post #135 |
|
Older than most people think I am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If it was beyond the competance of Brown, who would you have had holding the reins? From either party. |
![]() |
|
| C-too | Nov 27 2014, 11:07 AM Post #136 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Meanwhile it's OK if he takes undeserved abuse by politically biased people like yourself. !nono! |
![]() |
|
| C-too | Nov 27 2014, 11:22 AM Post #137 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
He was trapped, just as the Tories were trapped with nationalisation until the watershed of 1979. Before 2007/08 both parties were for the same economics, after the watershed of 2008 both major parties began to look in a different economic direction. The only things I have fully criticised this government for is the bedroom/box room tax and the lie that won them the last election, that they would sort the mess out in five years. It seems that any hypocrisy is all yours, or maybe it is just a lack of understanding on your part? (Perhaps you have been misled by the Tory press?) |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 27 2014, 04:37 PM Post #138 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
True Mr Pig, we used to know as we lived, worked, drank beer together and went to the same clubs. But today all that has been swept away and there is no unique "working class" we are more diverse in background and experiences than ever before. Such changes are not new, but the effect of the social changes has been rapid and this has left Politicians struggling to determine who their core voters are today. This effects Labour and Tory, but it is the former that has the greatest quandary and that is why it struggles to find a coherent message. There are no single messages or groups of such that attract, we the Voters are very much in a pick and mix frame of mind. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 27 2014, 04:38 PM Post #139 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Me biased? I thought that was your position. |
![]() |
|
| C-too | Nov 27 2014, 04:55 PM Post #140 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's a bit of psychological projection on your part. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Nov 27 2014, 09:16 PM Post #141 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Is there anyone that is truly without bias? In itself it is not a problem, not until that bias becomes so dominant that it has the effect of the person continually going off course and falling down. |
![]() |
|
| Nonsense | Nov 27 2014, 09:44 PM Post #142 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
'Old' Labour is dead,'New' Labour is dead. The old saying was that,"LABOUR is a crusade, or it's NOTHING", it is now 'NOTHING'. It ABANDONED, then BETRAYED the 'working class' of this country,NOTHING that it will ever say,can ever be taken as gospel. The FACT is, 'rhetoric' is not 'policy', no 'coherent' policy will be put before the people at the election next year, by ANY political party. Countless LIES\MYTHS have been ramme own the gullible throats of the electorate by politicians of ALL parties regarding immigration. What is NEVER stated, are the FACTS, for instance,"migration has been economically beneficial for this country",or,"Migrants come here primarily to WORK-NOT claim BENEFITS" Where are the FACTS to back up the above assertions & from what SOURCES have any FACTS ever been produced as EVIDENCE to back up the OPINIONS of those who say that the above are 'true'? If migrants 'only' come here to 'work'-NOT claim Benefits,then, there should be no reason to object by any political party or individual,if our government STOPPED paying Benefits to ALL immigrants,whether IN work or OUT of work. That includes the employers job subsidy AKA as 'Tax Credits', Housing Benefit,Council Tax Benefit, Disability Benefits et'c. After all, they do come here to 'work' NOT claim BENEFITS, right? |
![]() |
|
| C-too | Nov 27 2014, 10:08 PM Post #143 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
New Labour did more for the working man than any government since Clem Attlee. One of the main problems was the meltdown. Unemployment in 2006 was less than one million, unemployment by 2012 was 2.7 million. Tax credits are a necessity in order to make the basic income for working acceptable. No family could exist on the minimum wage alone. Strong opinions are all well and good, but the stronger the opinions then the more responsibility there is to be well informed. |
![]() |
|
| Nonsense | Nov 27 2014, 10:47 PM Post #144 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Personally,I have never,ever voted Labour,ONLY once have I ever voted(Tory),which, I have always regretted. It was when the unions went against Ted Heath's 'threshold' agreements package, whereby,if inflation went beyond (4%),an automatic payrise nationally would be invoked,of about (1%),which,considering the mess that the country had been in since WW2 was,arguably, not unreasonable,though,not just. I do not agree with your assertion that Labour have done more for the working man since Attlee. It is ingrained within Labour to keep the workers poor,as it always appears to be Labour that 'feeds' the poor,therefore, the workers will keep voting for 'Labour'. Since(in my opinion)Wilson,workers have been looked upon as fools by Labour,worker representation\democracy, have foundered within the Labour Party. The Tories have,like the American Republicans, NEVER been 'democrats',.save, as a means of aquiring power,in which to serve the vested interest of big business,that's the same direction that ALL three main parties here are slavishly following. The political\social direction in europe following New Labour's global free trade policy implementation is\will be followed by civil unrest in due course,europe will be overpopulated, with indiginous people becoming increasingly poorer,though little will happen to rectify this until Germany slides backwards in line with all other european economies. What is happening in this country, is a direct result of New Labour policies,supported by the Tories & Lib Dems. TAX CREDITS are a symptom of a bankrupt economy,it's an American concept, designed to make workers pay for their own Tax Credits,when they spend their disposable income,rather than increase the taxes of the better off,it also subsidises the rich business owners,through not increasing their business cost, but shifting that burden onto the people that do pay their taxes without the luxury of tax breaks,evasion or avoidance. Tax Credits are no substitute for paying a 'living wage' to workers. Even the NEW LABOUR introduction of paying a Guaranteed Minimum Wage(GMW),is merely a device in order for employers to pay the BASIC level to which suits them NOT the country or it's workers. Paying a low wage is 'self-defeating', it keeps a country in austerity or stagnation, economies benefit when money is moving around, NOT stagnating,which is what happens when demand is reduced through welfare cuts. To cut government spending STOP IMMIGRATION by exposing the LIES about it being beneficial to the economy, it is NOT ,it's 'beneficial' to EMPLOYERS ONLY. |
![]() |
|
| pladecalvo | Nov 28 2014, 01:05 PM Post #145 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Now the Tories jump on the bandwagon. Immigrants will not get some benefits for four years and if they don't a job within 6 months, 'Johnny Foreigner' gets sent back from whence he came. Call me an old cynic Mr Cameron but this wouldn't have anything to do with the success of UKIP would it??
|
![]() |
|
| Heinrich | Nov 28 2014, 01:17 PM Post #146 |
|
Regular Guy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You are of course right pladecalvo. The Tories plan to deport unemployed European Union citizens is illegal and will not happen. Also, refusing to pay benefits to EU citizens who are working in England is outlawed in current treaty and this will not happen as long as Britain is a member state. These are more pledges by the Tories that will not be delivered. How can ordinary English people believe such nonsense? |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 28 2014, 01:40 PM Post #147 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I suspect most of them don't. I think David Cameron's problem is he believes his own propaganda. A benefit "crack down" on immigrants will have negligible effect because so few new immigrants claim benefits. (He would know that if he bothered to look at the DWP database. The problem is not new immigrants claiming benefits it is 2nd and 3rd generation ones who parents and grandparents came here after the 2nd World War. In some case they are claiming a lot of benefits with unemployment rates in the 60%-75% area. Cameron is 60 years too late for a stable door closing exercise, the damage was done decades ago. As for making immigrants wait 4 years before they can get a council house Cameron cannot have looked at council waiting list recently. People who were born here are having to wait up to nine years or even longer. |
![]() |
|
| ACH1967 | Nov 28 2014, 01:48 PM Post #148 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
yes it's just a load of meaningless drivel. Mind you it will give the chattering classes something to chatter about. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 28 2014, 01:59 PM Post #149 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The problem is they are as ill informed as Cameron, whatever their political persuasion. |
![]() |
|
| Alberich | Nov 28 2014, 02:01 PM Post #150 |
|
Alberich
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The problem, Smurfy , is that you simply haven't grasped the really pressing issue. The damage was NOT done 60 odd years ago; although mistakes were made when we gave independence to the Indian sub continent. We should never have allowed that initial flood to occur. But it did, and it was managed after a fashion. The problem today has two driving forces. One was the shameful decision of New Labour to simply open the gates to all and sundry "to rub the noses of the right in it". And the other is our continued membership of the E.U. And both of these are fairly recent. We can't do much to undo the damage New Labour caused, but there is now a head of steam building up that means there has to be a release valve somewhere in the system. The E.U. will have to stop being so intransigent and accept that we in this smallish and already overcrowded island cannot continue as we are; having to accept quarter of a million arrivals annually. Either that, or we will leave, and I doubt that many in Euroland really want that to happen. And in my view, the latter will be forced upon us, sooner or later. Cameron has made some sensible suggestions on the benefits/welfare front, but I doubt very much that he has a snowball's chance in hell of getting his way on any of these. All the east European members will be up in arms, protesting at these "discriminatory measures".....The ECHR will not allow it....nor will the commission. The numbers are unsustainable. Our infrastructure is already at breaking point. Hospitals, doctors surgeries, schools, and housing are unable to cope where immigration is a major issue. And still they come. Managed immigration is a good thing. Unmanaged immigration is a disaster. And as we are not allowed to manage our immigration, it stands to reason that we either lose what is left of our national identity, or we leave the E.U. And roll on that day!!! |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 28 2014, 02:10 PM Post #151 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I grasped the pressing issue back in 1959 when I was 11 years old. ALL immigration is madness. Until British politicians take that on board, any policy suggested thus far by any mainstream political party is just tinkering. I am just, with my short life expectancy, glad it won't be my problem, and I don't have any children to be effected either. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 28 2014, 03:52 PM Post #152 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think not C2 as I have evidence and history on my side. You only appear to have a tub of white-wash and a masonry brush. |
![]() |
|
| pladecalvo | Nov 28 2014, 04:00 PM Post #153 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Aaaahahahaha!! Good one!Edited by pladecalvo, Nov 28 2014, 04:00 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| C-too | Nov 28 2014, 06:29 PM Post #154 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You must know you are biased, unless you really are as dim as the posts you put up.
|
![]() |
|
| C-too | Nov 28 2014, 06:32 PM Post #155 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The cackling of a Welsh idiot. The last time I was aware of such cackling the guy had been locked up in a Welsh cellar for most of his life.
|
![]() |
|
| Nonsense | Nov 28 2014, 06:41 PM Post #156 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Perhaps we ought to consider the following as a move in the direction of resolving the 'population' problem in this country & it is a 'population' problem. Relinquish the 'right's' of former 'Commonwealth' citizens to settle here. The government to abandon giving 'right's' to immigrants of citizenship in this country. Abolishing ALL Benefits to immigrants whilst working or otherwise in this country. After all, the immigrants\their supporters in this country cannot object to this, as they protest(rather too loudly)that they come here to WORK & NOT to claim Benefits. Prohibit ALL migrants from free NHS treatment, save for real 'emergency' treatment. The addition of a suffix on issued National Insurance Numbers to migrants,so that, when they attempt to obtain any NHS treatment, they must disclose their NHS number,which would then disclose their status,for acceptance\rejection to free treatment. ALL migrants must 'prove' their real identity, exact location of country of origin & parentage. ALL illegal migrants to be removed to the last point of departure from any other country en-passage to this country. Deport any immigrant that has been convicted of any criminal offence here,or, who has not disclosed any offense in the home country. Deport any immigrant fraudulently claiming welfare Benefits,even when no court case is involved. Further curtailments on spurious 'assylum' seekers,who claim assylum without genuine reasons,including 'gay' people 'fleeing' 'persecution'. 'Assylum' was never meant for those with social grievances within their own countries,anyway, people must PROVE beyond doubt the reason's for claiming 'assylum'. Make possible immigrants PROVE that they have a job to come to here & make the migrant's future EMPLOYER pay for ALL cost relating to the migrant's stay in this country,whether that be accommodation,health,travel,repatriation,housing, et'c. The EMPLOYER would be made liable for ALL expenses relating to any migrant in their employ that leaves his\her employment & absconds into the black economy. The EMPLOYER would have to PROVE that the employee had left the UK. Immigration is the main engine of population growth in this country. It is causing our young people to lose any hope of improving their lot over their lifetimes. We can achieve a population balance, by counting those allowed into the country & setting off the numbers who are emigrating. By so doing, we can announce our immigrant requirements for a couple of years in advance. Edited by Nonsense, Dec 1 2014, 01:54 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 28 2014, 06:45 PM Post #157 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So it's best to attack the individual rather than my point that the facts and history are with me and your only interest is one of seeking to rewrite. |
![]() |
|
| marybrown | Nov 28 2014, 06:51 PM Post #158 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
We have allowed them to be be run by Polish..anyone from Poland who can speak a smattering of English..is immediately made a boss.. Can we speak Polish??? Hell no... |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Nov 28 2014, 08:53 PM Post #159 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2852931/How-hiring-thousands-cheap-Eastern-European-workers-staff-warehouse-area-200-000-dole.html Busloads' of Polish workers arrive at Next's warehouse in West Yorkshire Unemployment higher than average in Humber and Yorkshire with 218,000 out of work Reports that Polish agency has sent 7,000 people to work at Next already Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2852931/How-hiring-thousands-cheap-Eastern-European-workers-staff-warehouse-area-200-000-dole.html#ixzz3KOmTMik0 Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Join the millions that use us for their forum communities. Create your own forum today. Learn More · Register for Free |
|
| « Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





12:36 AM Jul 14