| Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Honey Pot Britain | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 25 2014, 09:00 AM (1,493 Views) | |
| RJD | Nov 25 2014, 09:00 AM Post #1 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
DM Honey Pot Britain was designed in from Day One. This Gov. has cut inward migration from none EU countries to the levels of 1997 and will get them down further, but from the EU-8 they are stubbornly high and rising. Why? Bloody obvious in it, it's the in work Tax Credits. Only by blocking access for a period, 1 or 2 years say, for new arrivals will we inhibit them from coming here or we can just get rid of them for everyone, see wages rise and numbers of jobs decline. You choose. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 25 2014, 09:04 AM Post #2 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What you miss out RJD is the very much higher cost of living in Britain. Unfortunately most immigrants don't find that out until after they arrive here. If they were informed beforehand I suspect most would not bother coming here at all. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 25 2014, 09:07 AM Post #3 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Best check on the higher cost of living that is pertinent to them. This is not the same as the RPI etc. it is highly personalised and most know the ropes before they climb onto a bus. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 25 2014, 09:17 AM Post #4 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That is exactly what I was commenting about RJD. Housing being the biggest shock to them after they arrive, plus the cost of food, fuel, utilities, and so on more than wipe out any income differential. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 25 2014, 09:40 AM Post #5 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Then you are not aware of the conditions pertaining to such workers. In the main they are not buying houses, they are sharing the cost of rent, heat, transport, do tend to establish themselves in a group and are not coming to the UK to establish long term roots. For them the UK is a Honey Pot a short term one. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 25 2014, 09:44 AM Post #6 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Any evidence for the "short term," RJD? The only reason they are forty to a house is the high rents. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 25 2014, 09:48 AM Post #7 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yes there is plenty in the Public Domain. Here short term means ~5 years. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 25 2014, 09:50 AM Post #8 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well link to it then RJD. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 25 2014, 09:52 AM Post #9 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No time, the Sun is shining so I am off into my garden. You have plenty of time on your hands so why not for once do a bit of useful research. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 25 2014, 09:54 AM Post #10 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nonsense, you can't provide a link to back up your contention because no data exists and won't exist until next year. |
![]() |
|
| Heinrich | Nov 25 2014, 10:59 AM Post #11 |
|
Regular Guy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There is not much honey for the working class in "prosperous" England. |
![]() |
|
| Alberich | Nov 25 2014, 01:19 PM Post #12 |
|
Alberich
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
All I see is that we are having to accept a quarter of a million new arrivals each and every year. It would be nice to think that they come to fill vacancies in our jobs market, and that we have no trouble in accommodating them, or providing them with schooling, housing,and medical care. The opposite is true. So why do they keep on coming? Well, conditions in their homelands must be poor to motivate such a huge influx, but they come to the UK mainly because we are the most generous of the E.U. members to those who seek pastures new. And here RJD makes a valid point. Tax credits are a massive incentive, and if, as ALL the main parties now insist, we must curtail the numbers flocking to this overcrowded little island, then reducing the financial pull factor would be a good starting point. But I suspect that any attempt to discriminate against new arrivals in our welfare provisions would be verboten by the E.U. gauleiters who rule our lives to an ever increasing amount. A city the size of Newcastle each year needed simply to accommodate the flood...is that what we really need??? |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 25 2014, 05:16 PM Post #13 |
|
Deleted User
|
There must be reason why so many EU immigrants come here and it is not because they are better off where they came from is it? They MUST be better off coming here. |
|
|
| papasmurf | Nov 25 2014, 05:27 PM Post #14 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
They THINK they are, but they get a shock, when the reality hits, it is too late by then they don't have enough money to get back. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 25 2014, 05:37 PM Post #15 |
|
Deleted User
|
Utter, utter cobblers. |
|
|
| marybrown | Nov 25 2014, 05:42 PM Post #16 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I know a Polish couple..he works mornings..she afternoons..have 3 kids..the kids are tossed around like ballast..in a council house...and showing us the beautiful detached house they are having built in Poland..Work that one out!! |
![]() |
|
| HIGHWAY | Nov 25 2014, 06:24 PM Post #17 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Your moaning there working,,why? |
![]() |
|
| marybrown | Nov 25 2014, 06:35 PM Post #18 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm not moaning..but they still must have the same expenditures as we have..and yet they still have enough left over to build a house.. |
![]() |
|
| HIGHWAY | Nov 25 2014, 06:52 PM Post #19 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That's if there telling the truth of course Maybe they live well within there means,socially |
![]() |
|
| somersetli | Nov 25 2014, 07:03 PM Post #20 |
|
somersetli
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Isn't about time we put this tale of woe to bed? According to the Centre for Retail Research, consumers here in the UK are expected to spend £2Billion in a single day this week. £363 Million of it online. I would think "prosperous" is a fair word to describe that. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 25 2014, 07:14 PM Post #21 |
|
Deleted User
|
Many of the East Europeans( in my factory) work 5 to 6x12 hour shifts at minimum wage. If minimum wage is say £6.50 then they will earn £390 for 5 shifts and £468 for 6 shifts. Of course they can be sacked or their hours reduced at any time and the rate posted excludes any fee taken by the agency |
|
|
| Lewis | Nov 25 2014, 07:19 PM Post #22 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You might think its fair, but the majority would more than likely not think so. The prosperity in this country is distributed unfairly to far too few people. |
![]() |
|
| somersetli | Nov 25 2014, 07:28 PM Post #23 |
|
somersetli
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well it's going to take a lot of people to rack up £2Billion in one day. |
![]() |
|
| jaguar | Nov 25 2014, 07:32 PM Post #24 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You will always get poor people, you will always get rich people, and people like myself, not rich, not poor, but comfortably well off. That's life, that's the way of the World. Tell me one Country where that is not so? |
![]() |
|
| Rich | Nov 25 2014, 07:46 PM Post #25 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Surely the PM can't be wrong....or can he? or is it the plain and simple fact that the majority of us have known for years and purported by Ukip is forcing him to change his tune in such a way that it sounds as if he has been trying to fix the problem for ages.....it makes me want to spit, how is it that a supposed party of "nutjobs" can force the PM to virtually do a U turn on most of his policies? The answer is obvious, Milliband will be the next to tell his ministers in the shadow cabinet to start leaking Labours secret plans to control immigration overload (which they oversaw and ruthlessly implemented) and the benefits system which they also used to buy votes with. Is it any wonder that I hold these snakes in such low regard? http://www.express.co.uk/comment/expresscomment/539565/Benefits-UK-Migrants-wages Edited by Rich, Nov 25 2014, 07:46 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Lewis | Nov 25 2014, 07:55 PM Post #26 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It also shows that it is well past the time for a change! |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 25 2014, 08:14 PM Post #27 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It is £40 million spending £50 each, nothing dramatic. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Nov 25 2014, 08:53 PM Post #28 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Or 40 million spending £350 pw, £18,250 pa, or £18,300 in a leap year. Consumerism rules, OK. |
![]() |
|
| somersetli | Nov 25 2014, 10:53 PM Post #29 |
|
somersetli
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh yes?............I thought the argument was about the unequal distribution of wealth. According to your calculation everybody has got the same........£50 each. |
![]() |
|
| Curious Cdn | Nov 26 2014, 12:33 AM Post #30 |
|
Frozen Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
My gawd you people are paid sh1tty wages, over there. |
![]() |
|
| Heinrich | Nov 26 2014, 02:41 AM Post #31 |
|
Regular Guy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Prosperous for some but not for all. There is a conspicuous disparity of wealth in England. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Nov 26 2014, 10:09 AM Post #32 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Average income where I live £14400 a year. |
![]() |
|
| somersetli | Nov 26 2014, 11:02 AM Post #33 |
|
somersetli
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nobody is saying that everybody has the same level of prosperity, obviously some have it better than others, but when has it been any different? Some would have you believe that the current coalition government has suddenly created this inequality, and if we elect a different government we will all become equal. That is a delusion, I have lived through Labour, Conservative, Lib/Lab, and now Con/Lib, and I can say that none of it makes any difference. There has always been inequality under any government and there always will be, and if you could make everybody equally wealthy it would not be long before the situation would arise again. Edited by somersetli, Nov 26 2014, 06:29 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Heinrich | Nov 26 2014, 02:18 PM Post #34 |
|
Regular Guy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Try not to be so defeatist, somersetli. Do not become cynical. |
![]() |
|
| jaguar | Nov 26 2014, 02:32 PM Post #35 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
40,000,000 people spending£18,250 pa, Average income where you live £14400 a year. No wonder they need food banks. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 26 2014, 04:48 PM Post #36 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It certainly is and the UK is doing well relatively speaking compared with the rest of the EU. We are also fortunate in having the USA as a main market and an investor. No matter how the Shroud Wavers wish to paint it, the truth is that the UK is not only doing relatively well it is also generous towards those who are not capable, for whatever reason, of looking after themselves. I do not see any of the Whingers recommending we swap our Welfare Benefits for those of most of the EU. Not heard one of them shout "we want what the Krauts get"! |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Nov 26 2014, 05:38 PM Post #37 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| RJD | Nov 26 2014, 05:40 PM Post #38 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | Nov 26 2014, 05:45 PM Post #39 |
|
Deleted User
|
|
|
|
| Affa | Nov 26 2014, 06:29 PM Post #40 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Germany is an interesting case. My interpretation is that ostensibly Germany were advocates of austerity, their rhetoric certainly so. How could it not be when considering how it imposed harsh austrity measures on struggling euro zone members? In reality it has been different - Germany went for stimulus. btw RJD challenges the facts - he needs to say which and why. Latterly it has made a huge investment in growth (affordable - since it has no deficit) Units is euros! ![]() But whereas earnings in the UK have fallen in real terms (= austerity), not so in Germany ...... ![]() Edited by Affa, Nov 26 2014, 06:35 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)






12:35 AM Jul 14