| Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Crisis? What Crisis?; Autumn Statement | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Dec 3 2014, 01:29 PM (824 Views) | |
| Affa | Dec 3 2014, 01:29 PM Post #1 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I must acknowledge the past error of mine of identifying Osborne and his party as the Doom & Gloom party. Today I have heard nothing of the sort ....... no crisis of funding for the NHS, the housing market/shortage solved, and Welfare spending coming down (at last). The recovery is under-way, strong, and the shortages we are told in the Treasury are turning into a glut. What a wonderful week for the country, the government, the grandchildren. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Tigger | Dec 7 2014, 01:53 PM Post #41 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Did they spend it on White Lightening, at William Hill's or on takeaways by any chance? Oh, and on trainers. (Psst Queen Victoria died in 1901) |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 7 2014, 02:02 PM Post #42 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'll keep this fairly brief, the answer is short termism and crap management that cannot plan any further ahead than this time next week. When I set about expanding my business ten years ago I got this advice from my then bank, borrow lots of money, the advice from a management consultancy was to cut costs (ie wages) and undercut potential rivals, the local job centre was convinced that people who could barely speak English would be best placed to read complex architectural plans, (but they were cheap) and the idea of retraining staff at some not insignificant cost did not go down well with the accountant we had at the time. I found the inspiration and indeed a lot of the technical help across the North Sea in Denmark and Germany. Edited by Tigger, Dec 7 2014, 02:04 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 7 2014, 02:09 PM Post #43 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nothing new there then, many on the right have been demanding fiscal prudence for decades and were unnerved by the easy way Browne expanded the money supply with cheap untutored credit. Yes his predecessors were lax, but what Brown did was shocking in the extreme. Borrowing money to fuel current consumption during the boom years was a disgraceful act of belligerence against future generations. Yes the UK economy was overheated and swimming in cheap money and loans to those not normally worthy of credit grew on trees. In the same way flooding the UK market with cheap immigrant labour just to rub the noses of the Tories with multicultural dirt was narrow minded, overtly political and ignored the interests of the UK public. It took NL 8 years to rubbish our economy and it will take at least 16 for it to recover. If you really do believe in sound money then you cannot support Labour and would find it difficult to support the Tories. However at least the Tories can articulate the problems even if they do not have the gonads to drive through the necessary solutions. Your support of the left does not fit with your stated economic desires, if you really do believe we should rebalance our economy away from consumption towards production then you are placing you trust with the wrong lot. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 7 2014, 02:19 PM Post #44 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Clearly rubbish as most investments in new capacity are years in the planning and most of the volume producers in the UK are using state of art manufacturing technologies. You do not have a real business, you do not develop or manufacture, you only install bits n pieces made by others with friends who you confessed were self employed. All short term low risk activities. Seems to me that what you have is akin to an old fashioned Ganger, yes Ganger not Gangster. So please stop referring to yourself as a Businessman. I have found that British Managers were equally as good and bad as there counterparts in Europe. The redeeming feature is that the Brits know best how to make capital sweat and you will find if you put in the effort to do some research that UK Managers perform very well according to the metrics used by investors, just look how many FTSE listed companies are in the top 50, more than France plus Germany together. |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 7 2014, 02:19 PM Post #45 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Of course the Tories will do nothing to change what Brown essentially did because it works very well for them and their ilk, The better off have actually thrived under austerity, this is as plain as the nose on your face. With modern Conservatism the name of the game is trying to find the moral high ground for selfishness and that means scape goating anyone who is not like them. The Tories started neo liberal economics in this country and continue with them and it will eventually bankrupt us and lead to civil disorder as fewer people are able to participate in the economy. |
![]() |
|
| Steve K | Dec 7 2014, 02:23 PM Post #46 |
|
Once and future cynic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ahem, that was my point The Edanistas (formerly known as Gorgonistas) rant on about millions in the UK being in poverty using newspeak. Take them to real poverty as UNESCO knows it and they would die of shock. But it was NewLab that told us they'd make poverty history and their followers are so up their own fundamental orifices they can't see they have both feet in their mouths. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 7 2014, 02:29 PM Post #47 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Pure hyperbole. Zero substance. |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 7 2014, 02:33 PM Post #48 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I run an SME not a corporation in hock to shareholders or with the ear of sympathetic politicians subsidizing investment or the workforce, and I can assure you competition at this low level is red in both tooth and claw. And I have not "confessed" to having a self employed workforce that is your rampant imagination at work again, we have a mixture full time employees and partners. SME's are the backbone of the economy and employ more people in total than any other grouping, and take it from me many of them are badly managed this is why the productivity you mentioned in reference to these companies is so dire, I do have a few friends who were in "big business" and they confirmed what I long suspected, British businesses are predominantly short term in outlook because of primarily shareholder pressure for quick returns, it is no accident that much of out manufacturing is now safely in foreign hands, and not forgetting Vince Cable's mauling at the hands of the banks and Osbourn for even daring to suggest German style small banks that specialise in lending to small businesses. File under is it 1960 yet? |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 7 2014, 02:37 PM Post #49 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
All substance I'm afraid. Which bit of my factual claim that the Tories are blowing yet another unsustainable housing bubble on the back of zero wage growth and with the backdrop of rocketing governmental debt did you not understand? It's the economic policies of the madhouse. Edited by Tigger, Dec 7 2014, 02:38 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Steve K | Dec 7 2014, 02:41 PM Post #50 |
|
Once and future cynic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Productivity as currently published is Value of output/Units of labour expended so it is hard to increase it while the world market for just about everything except food is depressed. As you imply we could increase it by increasing unemployment but that's the road to social breakdown (and that would seriously kill productivity). We certainly cannot try to sell our wares to the world at uncompetitive prices I rather feel that national productivity should be Value of output/Available work force hours I found this Grauniad article quite good especially as it has this very interesting chart showing what is gaining and what is losing ground
|
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 7 2014, 02:50 PM Post #51 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just to add, job sharing, zero hours etc so beloved of this government is a sure fire way to lower productivity, it adds confusion and time wasting to any equation involving produtivity. |
![]() |
|
| C-too | Dec 7 2014, 02:58 PM Post #52 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
LOL. Thanks for the laugh. |
![]() |
|
| C-too | Dec 7 2014, 03:09 PM Post #53 |
|
Honourable Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No mention of relative poverty? Back in 2004ish no serious individual thought that real poverty existed in the UK. Many informed people knew that the numbers living in relative poverty rose dramatically during the 18 years of Tory mismanagement. It seems that the references to real poverty are only made by those who wish to denigrate NL/Labour. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 8 2014, 03:54 PM Post #54 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Such concern for for what was, or supposedly was, but is there any for what is - Today's Parliamentary Committee report blaming problems with the Welfare reforms for the increased and increasing need for food banks. It states that many families are one unexpected bill away from crisis. |
![]() |
|
| jaguar | Dec 8 2014, 04:04 PM Post #55 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The all-party Commons group on hunger warned that some parents spend far too much money on cigarettes, alcohol, takeaways and other ‘non-essential items of expenditure’ because they lack basic budgeting skills. Many more cannot cook even the simplest meals for their children – leaving them to go hungry. The MPs call upon TEACHERS to do more to report parents from chaotic households so they can receive help from ‘troubled families’ units. However, they conclude: ‘We should not leave the duty resting with schools. Parents have duties, and these duties are not abated by the chaos resulting from their lifestyle.’ Also this is not only a UK problem In the EUROPEAN UNION, a quarter of the population(125 million people) is at risk of poverty or social exclusion, 11% cannot afford a meal with meat, chicken or fish every second day (Source Eurostat). The European Federation of Food Banks (FEBA) brings together 256 food banks in 21 countries in Europe. Its goal is to give each person in Europe, access to a sufficient and balanced DIET, through the fight against waste and call for solidarity. In 2013, the European Food Banks distributed 402 000 tons of food, equivalent to 804 million meals, to 5,7 million people in partnership with 31 000 charitable organisations and SOCIAL SERVICES. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 8 2014, 04:10 PM Post #56 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Transferring the blame again, putting the onus of responsibility om others, and once more tarring every sufferer with the Chav brush ........ The report stated where the problems arise ....... it is with Administration! Probably because the staffing levels, the people handling these claims, are unable to keep pace with demand. Cuts will do that! |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Dec 8 2014, 04:15 PM Post #57 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It stated NO such thing, I suggest taking that comment back, or put it in context:- https://foodpovertyinquiry.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/food-poverty-feeding-britain-final.pdf |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 8 2014, 04:16 PM Post #58 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
|
![]() |
|
| ACH1967 | Dec 8 2014, 04:25 PM Post #59 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Jaguar did nothing of the sort. Once again you are taking what someones says and acusing tham of saying something else. No interest in honesty or the truth just in perpetuating your belief system. If anyone is transfering the blame it is you. It is quite clear, if what you and jaguar has posted is true, that the problem is more complex than just lack of money. Whilst cuts are no doubt exacerbating the problem it is pergfectly clear that they are not the whole problem. Accusing someone of being a bigot or selfish just because they don't agree with you only makes you look ridiculous. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 8 2014, 04:30 PM Post #60 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You know you have won the argument (I can't call it debate) when the opposition resort to invention. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 9 2014, 03:02 PM Post #61 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think the report did a good job of avoiding the blame game and recognising that the problems are a lot more complex than the simplistic one liners offered on this forum. The truth is that all, Labour and Tory predecessors, are to blame and all are part of a solution and this includes those that find them,selves in need to support. All that said much of the solution lies in making the UK a country that once again produces a growing demand for real skills. Dumbing down, deskilling and pumping up Big Nanny was a very big mistake and it will take a decade or so to get over, if ever. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 9 2014, 05:57 PM Post #62 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sarcasm has mentioning previous Tory governments as being the object being referred to here .......... it BIG NANNY under Thatcher for example - and little Nanny when Brown was Chancellor.
|
![]() |
|
| Rich | Dec 9 2014, 08:07 PM Post #63 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Apparently there are many food banks.....we are also constantly told that the country is suffering a widescale problem of obesity, mainly in the poor sector, one cannot have it both ways. |
![]() |
|
| Lewis | Dec 9 2014, 08:30 PM Post #64 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
People with cash problems tend to feed on the cheaper, more processed foods. These tend to be loaded with sugar, salt and fats. You don't have to be starving to be malnourished. |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 9 2014, 09:00 PM Post #65 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What on earth has big nanny to do with de-skilling and dumbing down? The latter two are the products of a boom and bust economy and short termism, both favoured by the moneyed classes. If there was a loony emoticon I'd have used it. |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 9 2014, 09:01 PM Post #66 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Brain not engaged Rich? |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 9 2014, 09:22 PM Post #67 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That'd explain it! |
![]() |
|
| Lewis | Dec 9 2014, 10:50 PM Post #68 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would have thought the Tory incompetents would dearly like to have a dumbed down and unskilled workforce for fat cat bosses to exploit. Mind you that's why they like Eastern Europeean immigrants to fulfil that function. |
![]() |
|
| Tytoalba | Dec 9 2014, 11:10 PM Post #69 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Processed food can be expensive whist basic foods , those that are unprocessed can be relatively cheap. Bought a stew pack of vegetables to feed four in Sainsbury's for a £1 last week. A pitsa for two in Aldi's is a £1. I bought both. Perhaps as an exercise to prove the truth of it we should draw up a list of basics to see what they really cost, for rich or poor alike. |
![]() |
|
| Rich | Dec 10 2014, 12:24 AM Post #70 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Carry on chaps, you are nothing more than a name to me. |
![]() |
|
| ACH1967 | Dec 10 2014, 11:18 AM Post #71 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Let’s try a slightly different approach. Are people saying that all of people who use food banks are con artists? If not then there is clearly a growing demand for food banks. This means there are people, for whatever reason, who do not have enough money for food. This is not a good thing for any society . |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 10 2014, 11:51 AM Post #72 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's just the usual head in the sand bollocks from the self deceiving right wing fraternity, a rise in the number of people using food banks is nothing to do with real poverty (despite numerous reports even from parliament) but is everything to do with the "nanny state," lazyness and people having no pride in themselves or lacking get up and go. Personally I find it utterly shameful that as a supposedly first world nation we have people who struggle to get enough food. |
![]() |
|
| Steve K | Dec 10 2014, 01:06 PM Post #73 |
|
Once and future cynic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
An interesting disclaimer on the front of that report "This is not an official publication of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. It has not been approved by either House or its Committees. All-Party Groups are informal groups of members of both Houses with a common interest in particular issues. The views expressed in this Report are those of the Inquiry team established by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Hunger and Food Poverty." And an interesting point made on page 10 "The other force at work is the addictions that many individuals and families have, but which particularly sharply affects the budgeting of low-income families. We refer here to the size of income in some families going on drugs, tobacco and gambling. A family earning £21,000 a year, for example, where both parents smoke 20 cigarettes a day will spend a quarter of their income on tobacco. Even if people buy illicit tobacco they will still spend 15% of their total income on tobacco. Budgeting support is terribly important, but budgetary support alone is often not enough to equip families to kick their addictive habits when addiction is being fed and defended by some very powerful lobbies." |
![]() |
|
| ACH1967 | Dec 10 2014, 01:26 PM Post #74 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
So jaguar is correct. |
![]() |
|
| Steve K | Dec 10 2014, 02:41 PM Post #75 |
|
Once and future cynic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Seems so. I hope no one holds their breath waiting for the needed apology |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 10 2014, 03:54 PM Post #76 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Food Banks numbers are the tip of the iceberg ......... many more are struggling and do not visit. It isn't correct to determine that all people making food bank claims are there because they waste money on cigs (or other). The findings are that it is the none arrival of benefit giros causing the crisis as the major problem ......... spin will not escape that conclusion, simply because the criteria being used exposes those that do waste their money. Claimants are assessed their difficulties analysed and entitlement approved by a care expert ........ you people hang your coat on a peg (cigs) that can't take the weight of the BS it is carrying. Edited by Affa, Dec 10 2014, 03:57 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| ACH1967 | Dec 10 2014, 04:08 PM Post #77 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I absolutely agree but denying the truth of someone elses post and trying to pretend that a report doesn't say what it clearly says doesn't spread truth. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 10 2014, 04:16 PM Post #78 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It wasn't the article itself making the claim that "jaguar was correct". Edited by Affa, Dec 10 2014, 04:17 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 10 2014, 05:12 PM Post #79 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Certainly was, the only difference is that in the earlier period the starting point was a clapped out economy that was termed The Sick Man of Europe and the starting point in 1997 was a growing economy with growth in jobs and revenues. Yep that wicked woman spent far too much of Taxpayers money featherbedding those workers that had to switch from clapped out industries. Nasty bitch she should have let them starve. |
![]() |
|
| Steve K | Dec 10 2014, 05:50 PM Post #80 |
|
Once and future cynic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Most of that I agree with, the delays in benefits and over zealous sanctioning are serious issues but the actual level of benefits is likely not. You may recall I have endlessly asked for illustrative cases to show us where that is not true. What we do know is the BBC published some illustrative cases and tobacco, mobile phones, Sky TV and alcohol were disturbingly high components. And that report did say spending on the like was an issue in some families. PS should admit he was wrong. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() Our users say it best: "Zetaboards is the best forum service I have ever used." |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)




12:36 AM Jul 14