| Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Want a job? Get skills | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Dec 15 2014, 09:15 AM (1,473 Views) | |
| RJD | Dec 15 2014, 09:15 AM Post #1 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Skills shortage There has been a disconnect for a long time now with young people ignoring trade skills and University courses in difficult technology subjects as a consequence there has been a shortage of such people throughout the recent recession, now we are back to growth the situation is worse. We need to encourage not discourage young people to study and train in technologies. Yes Employers can always do more, but if the interest is not there then this will be to no avail. Young people need to get the message that those with skills have done well and will continue to do so and those without will continue to compete for low paid menial jobs will all and sundry. It is a tough competitive World and no Gov. is going to come along and solve their personal difficulties, as the man said "on yer bike". |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Pro Veritas | Dec 15 2014, 09:54 PM Post #41 |
|
Upstanding Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Of course, if Microsoft is genuinely concerned about there being a shortfall of 100,000 digitally skilled workers the obvious thing for Microsoft to do is to lower the cost of their accredited technician scheme, so that more people can afford to skill-up. Which, by the way, is what MUST happen if you believe - like you do - that "the market" finds the appropriate value of any given commodity. If there are not enough people buying the training Microsoft is offering at the current price it means it is overpriced. Or was that too simple and obvious a solution for you, and them? All The Best |
![]() |
|
| Pro Veritas | Dec 15 2014, 10:08 PM Post #42 |
|
Upstanding Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
And, of course, Microsoft see no benefit to themselves by announcing that 100,000 people need to take advantage of training that they are a principal provider of? All The Best |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 15 2014, 10:11 PM Post #43 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Employers need to step up to the plate, not the government. Vocational training is just that, vocational. If employers just expect the government to churn out suitable workers, and I sadly suspect many will, for them at little or no cost to themselves they'll be disappointed, just like they were when Blair expanded university education. And I found that out the hard way. |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 15 2014, 10:13 PM Post #44 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Silly boy! You should know by now that profit margins must be maintained come rain or shine. Microsoft should ask the government for additional funding.
|
![]() |
|
| Marconi | Dec 15 2014, 11:22 PM Post #45 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
When young people are past 18 and in full-time work, unless their employer offers further training, they find it very difficult to better themselves by their own steam. Of course many do succeed by using their own money and their own time to gain better qualifications, but many, many more do not because they lack said money and time. Are they that much different from the Danes? I would argue not. It's just that the Denmark has created a culture to help young people succeed. As an aside, we are down to 4 auditors where I work, and when a vacancy for 2 Non-Destructive Test Inspectors appeared on the board last week, all 4 of us applied immediately. Jeez, full-training and a good job at the end of it, I'd bite your hand off for that. They are paying £16 an hour in my own town for that same function. Anyway, once our managers found out that all their auditors had applied, we have now all been offered courses next year! Mine is a 6th Sigma Black Belt course. Sounds good, I think. I wish I knew what it was. Martial arts in quality I hope. So that I can knock out that tattooed white ape of an operator who keeps putting crap in the box! |
![]() |
|
| Steve K | Dec 15 2014, 11:39 PM Post #46 |
|
Once and future cynic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
IIRC Six Sigma black belts are supposed to be Six Sigma champions, in my experience such were very clever people but a bit detached from reality. But then I'm not a great six sigma fan. Some of the theory is very good but the practice often becomes flawed esp when dealing with software. |
![]() |
|
| Marconi | Dec 15 2014, 11:49 PM Post #47 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks Steve, for the info. Can I ask if you know much about the Non-Destructive Inspection roles on offer? Worth pursuing that route? My own instinct is to stick with quality, because if the firm did go belly up by any chance, it can be applied to other industries, and so a better chance of a job. NDT looks quite specialist, so the rate might be better, but less of those jobs. Edited by Marconi, Dec 16 2014, 12:02 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 16 2014, 08:17 AM Post #48 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
A solution, but easier just to go elsewhere. The Chinese are pumping out Software Engineers with Masters Degrees and as far as I know they have no genetic limitations to their ability to do anything other than a first rate job of it. It is a global market and Microsoft is free to invest where it believes the labour resources provide their best long term security. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 16 2014, 08:23 AM Post #49 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think you will find that 6 Sigma quality standards (reliability) translate across and number of industry sectors, particularly electronics, I would advise that you investigate this opportunity in depth before you discard it. It could just be the career change facilitator you are looking for. Try google. |
![]() |
|
| Steve K | Dec 16 2014, 10:07 AM Post #50 |
|
Once and future cynic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Seconded Sorry Marconi I don't know much on those roles I was Six Sigma trained in the mid 90s. It was and arguably is the best implementation of process analysis to improve end product quality. What I particularly liked was that it so often shows the root causes of poor product are not in the operatives but in the product and manufacturing process design. As an Engineering manager that changed my philosophy dramatically. Six Sigma has some inherent weaknesses though. One is that inevitably company and division heads want to brag about how successful they are in terms of six sigma rating (no one wants to admit to being only 5 sigma) and that drove emphasis on increased opportunity counts rather than the source of defects - wrong, wrong wrong. The truth is Six Sigma quality levels are not really possible with High Mix Low Volume manufacturing and that is probably the UK's biggest manufacturing strength. Six Sigma also struggles to deal with software, in my experience software defies any proper analytical control, and more and more the end product issues were in the software not the build quality. My then and subsequent employers both quietly sidelined the true Sig Sigma aspects and just wanted to use Six Sigma as a brand title for a whole raft of quality enhancing philosophies sadly generally applied only AFTER a problem was discovered. As for quality roles in general they are essential but their status and future depend so much on the company leadership. It is so so easy to get an ISO 9000 accreditation and that is all some company heads care about. One of the phrases that most influenced me is "you cannot inspect quality in" so when a quality audit tells you processes are being flouted you have to take serious action and fast. I have never once had top level support for the action truly needed (to identify and correct root causes and all areas affected) but there are companies out there that very much do have that culture led from the top. So sorry not really an answer, more a meandering essay. Update: The Wiki article on six sigma ain't bad http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma it corrects what i said about black belts and also mention the financial side. In the end any good quality initiative saves a company money but I have seen more than once a financially driven leadership expect the needed costs for a Six Sigma programme to be found from the savings in that same year. Utter fuckwittery. So again think about what really drives the organisation. A couple of other points. One of the best six sigma implementations I saw was at a sister division who realised that one of their root problems was their Engineering processes. They re-engineered them to be a sixth of their previous volume (but a serious multiple of being stuck to) And look at the IT philosophy of a company. In many IT is there for command/reporting especially financial however it should be at least as much about enabling design and manufacturing teams to do their job well by giving access to timely, relevant and complete data. I've seen that once. Summary: knowing what your company leadership really does focus on will indicate the status and support of Quality roles Edited by Steve K, Dec 16 2014, 10:22 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| disgruntled porker | Dec 16 2014, 10:24 AM Post #51 |
|
Older than most people think I am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's obvious isn't it? The workhouse of course! |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Dec 16 2014, 12:34 PM Post #52 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
QC, NDT, isn't so demanding if you have even average nounce, and you Marconi have more than that. Not too hard to learn how use technological tools (and be able to analyse findings), and over time it can become rather repetitive - a doddle! If you go for it I advise you bear this in mind and focus on it - 'always know and be sure why you test and what you are looking for'. The Why of it more important than the how. You can train monkeys to operate test machines, but a monkey cannot know what to do with the findings. |
![]() |
|
| Marconi | Dec 16 2014, 12:41 PM Post #53 |
|
Regular Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks Steve and RJD for the information. It's a great help indeed. |
![]() |
|
| disgruntled porker | Dec 17 2014, 12:40 AM Post #54 |
|
Older than most people think I am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I did the exams for NDT back in the early 90's. Not too difficult. The environment in which you could be working is probably more challenging than the job. Not highly paid either. There were few vacancies and lots of people chasing those jobs at that time too. The last thing I did involving ndt was testing the turrets for challenger tank.
Edited by disgruntled porker, Dec 17 2014, 12:44 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Heinrich | Dec 17 2014, 06:22 AM Post #55 |
|
Regular Guy
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It is rubbish to say that working with hands is unimportant and that English kids should be aping the small wage computer industry like India. Ask yourself, why is Germany an industrial European powerhouse. What England needs is to give the Tories and New Labour the boot and elect politician who believe in and will support manufacturing once again. |
![]() |
|
| Cymru | Dec 17 2014, 07:01 AM Post #56 |
|
Alt-Right
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
In my opinion we should be investing in robotics and transitioning from a market economy to a planned one. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 17 2014, 08:38 AM Post #57 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Planned by Politicians? We tried that and it failed everywhere. Best to plan against/for market expectations and not political ones. Every time Politicians intervene they leave a mess behind them, best to spend time regulating in order to get the best of capitalism for the majority. I do not wish to be forced to buy Trabands. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 17 2014, 08:41 AM Post #58 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Maybe you need to take a Primer in Economics as it is all to do with added value and those lifting on the wheels and turning the final screws add little. Best you learn what goes into the value adding chain and how dependent manufacturing is on meeting volume budgets in order to be profitable prior to pontificating on such matters. Your obvious ignorance is breathtaking. |
![]() |
|
| Pro Veritas | Dec 17 2014, 09:14 AM Post #59 |
|
Upstanding Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Yeah, of course it did. China's economy is abysmal... ...oh, wait. All The Best |
![]() |
|
| Pro Veritas | Dec 17 2014, 09:16 AM Post #60 |
|
Upstanding Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Perhaps you could explain just what value is added to a product by the "service sector" that you seem to think, in your OP, we need to upskill 100,000 people for. All The Best |
![]() |
|
| disgruntled porker | Dec 17 2014, 09:33 AM Post #61 |
|
Older than most people think I am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It's because the sainted Margaret wanted to decimate the production economy to make way for a service economy. He can't see any further than that. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Dec 17 2014, 09:57 AM Post #62 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well RJD I have been waiting two weeks for a certificated gas fitter to connect a new gas hob to the pipe to the changeover valve outside and do a leak test. (About 1/2 an hours work and he lives 20 yards away.) He has been leaving for work at 07.00 hours every day for those two weeks including weekends and not getting back until 20.00 hours. The only other certificated gas fitters in the area live a long way away and would have to charge a lot of money because of travelling time and costs. My job is not urgent as we have a more than adequate camping gas hob we can use until the he can do the job. |
![]() |
|
| AndyK | Dec 17 2014, 10:02 AM Post #63 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Do it yourself and get someone to leak test whenever. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Dec 17 2014, 10:19 AM Post #64 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I am not risking jail. Plus getting a leak test poses the same difficulty. Very few people certificated to do it and they are as busy as my neighbour, I also could not use it until it is certificated because there would be no insurance cover. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 17 2014, 12:22 PM Post #65 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Maybe you could first provide me with the product identification and current market price in order that I can make a start. Or is this a generalised question that will go nowhere? Do you think that those in the Public Sector will be able to deliver in the future without requisite skills in digital technologies? I think not as much is now presented on the internet. |
![]() |
|
| Cymru | Dec 17 2014, 05:47 PM Post #66 |
|
Alt-Right
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Technocrats. |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 17 2014, 09:18 PM Post #67 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I did offer to buy him a new stylus but he ignored the offer for some reason. |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 17 2014, 09:22 PM Post #68 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I largely agree, politicians should be the referees and not the managers, red cards should be shown to teams that do not place any value on the society they operate in. |
![]() |
|
| ACH1967 | Dec 18 2014, 09:03 AM Post #69 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
good analogy |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 18 2014, 01:13 PM Post #70 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Because I know it takes a lot of blows to drive a nail through a thick plank. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Dec 18 2014, 01:39 PM Post #71 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
That depends on how skilful the hammer wielder is. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 18 2014, 04:30 PM Post #72 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Very true, but there are some types of wood that are very hard to penetrate even with the sharpest of nails. |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 18 2014, 07:01 PM Post #73 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Still using old technology I see, we use Paslode nailer's these days. |
![]() |
|
| Lewis | Dec 19 2014, 08:13 AM Post #74 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Precisely and in this instance the hammer wielder fails to possess such skills. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 19 2014, 11:14 AM Post #75 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You are not qualified to judge. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 19 2014, 11:15 AM Post #76 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No doubt, but I would not recommend that you use this technique to secure water pipes. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Dec 19 2014, 02:46 PM Post #77 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
When it comes to wielding hammers, I am far more qualified than you are. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Dec 19 2014, 06:28 PM Post #78 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How come? I invented them. |
![]() |
|
| papasmurf | Dec 19 2014, 07:01 PM Post #79 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I didn't realise you were 32000 years old RJD? |
![]() |
|
| Tigger | Dec 19 2014, 09:49 PM Post #80 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Didn't you use pipe clips when you
Edited by Tigger, Dec 19 2014, 09:49 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Sign-up for Free |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic » |




![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)




12:34 AM Jul 14