Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
What is Labour for?
Topic Started: Jan 30 2015, 08:21 AM (3,069 Views)
RJD
Member Avatar
Prudence and Thrift
[ *  *  *  * ]

Quote:
 
Labour would not reverse billions of pounds of spending cuts to the police, hospitals, armed forces and local councils, Ed Balls has confirmed.
The savings include cutting £3.3billion from councils’ budgets, making £700million worth of cuts to the pay of members of the armed forces and shaving £400million off the NHS pay bill.


LINK

It has to be asked, what are Labour for if it is going to match the Tory budget programme? They now promise to stick to current Coalition plans so what are the offering? Maybe they think they can offer an experienced Management Team that can stimulate the economy and hold a tighter grip on State spending? Makes one want to laugh. Let's get real, without a programme of increases in State expenditure coupled with a programme of social engineering to make us fit their mould there is absolutely no point in Labour.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
ACH1967
Member Avatar
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 12:52 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 12:47 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 12:40 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 11:46 AM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
Objectivity is the word you need to contemplate.
As you should contemplate irony
I understand both irony and objectivity. I also recognise indirect and cowardly comments, clearly the problem exists with yourself.
You have more than adequately demonstrated you do not understand objectivity.

By the way how is that paranoia working out for you?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 01:06 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 12:52 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 12:47 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 12:40 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
As you should contemplate irony
I understand both irony and objectivity. I also recognise indirect and cowardly comments, clearly the problem exists with yourself.
You have more than adequately demonstrated you do not understand objectivity.

By the way how is that paranoia working out for you?
Your childish comment says it all about you.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ACH1967
Member Avatar
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 01:21 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 01:06 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 12:52 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 12:47 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
I understand both irony and objectivity. I also recognise indirect and cowardly comments, clearly the problem exists with yourself.
You have more than adequately demonstrated you do not understand objectivity.

By the way how is that paranoia working out for you?
Your childish comment says it all about you.
As do yours
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affa
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 12:16 AM


Around 2004 the CBI was (still) complaining about the numbers of 16 to 25 years old people who were lacking in education. It is a long term problem.

In 2004 this group of people began their important early education between 1984-1993. The product of teaching assistants, shared text books, and low moral in the teaching profession.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 01:28 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 01:21 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 01:06 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 12:52 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
You have more than adequately demonstrated you do not understand objectivity.

By the way how is that paranoia working out for you?
Your childish comment says it all about you.
As do yours
OMG, schoolyard replies from you. Genuine question, are you over 16 ?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ACH1967
Member Avatar
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 04:19 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 01:28 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 01:21 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 01:06 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
Your childish comment says it all about you.
As do yours
OMG, schoolyard replies from you. Genuine question, are you over 16 ?
OMG...Really!!!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
ACH1967
Feb 10 2015, 08:09 AM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 04:19 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 01:28 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 01:21 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
As do yours
OMG, schoolyard replies from you. Genuine question, are you over 16 ?
OMG...Really!!!
You might just be a late, a very late, developer. !wav!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ACH1967
Member Avatar
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Feb 10 2015, 08:15 AM
ACH1967
Feb 10 2015, 08:09 AM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 04:19 PM
ACH1967
Feb 9 2015, 01:28 PM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep
OMG, schoolyard replies from you. Genuine question, are you over 16 ?
OMG...Really!!!
You might just be a late, a very late, developer. !wav!
Better late than never.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Affa
Feb 9 2015, 01:42 PM
C-too
Feb 9 2015, 12:16 AM


Around 2004 the CBI was (still) complaining about the numbers of 16 to 25 years old people who were lacking in education. It is a long term problem.

In 2004 this group of people began their important early education between 1984-1993. The product of teaching assistants, shared text books, and low moral in the teaching profession.
Yes, Thatcher made a bad situation worse.

1985: Thatcher snubbed by Oxford dons
"Oxford University has delivered a stunning snub to the Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher by refusing her an honorary degree.

Academics have led a campaign against honouring Mrs Thatcher in protest against the government's cuts in funding for education.

The vote against the prime minister was much higher than expected 738 to 319 and was greeted with cheers by students who handed in a 5,000 signature petition.

It means she becomes the first Oxford-educated prime minister since the war to be denied the honour".
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RJD
Member Avatar
Prudence and Thrift
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Feb 8 2015, 05:08 PM
Affa
Feb 8 2015, 03:27 PM
C-too
Feb 8 2015, 09:15 AM
Gnikkk
Feb 8 2015, 07:42 AM
Smell the coffee, shame they don't also admit they caused it all in the first pace.
Another Mail, Telegraph reader ??

Perceived reality!
The method by which repeated blame calling obtains the perception of truth, and for no other purpose than party politics.
Is asking a question now off limits ?
Certainly not. But poor logic and shooting the Messenger is.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
RJD
Feb 10 2015, 05:25 PM
C-too
Feb 8 2015, 05:08 PM
Affa
Feb 8 2015, 03:27 PM
C-too
Feb 8 2015, 09:15 AM

Quoting limited to 4 levels deep

Perceived reality!
The method by which repeated blame calling obtains the perception of truth, and for no other purpose than party politics.
Is asking a question now off limits ?
Certainly not. But poor logic and shooting the Messenger is.

I agree. ;D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic »
Add Reply