Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Justification for striking?
Topic Started: Aug 5 2015, 06:40 AM (2,910 Views)
RJD
Member Avatar
Prudence and Thrift
[ *  *  *  * ]
How much a newly-qualified tube driver makes per hour, compared to other careers
Career Teacher Firefighter Nurse Policeman Tube driver
£/hr worked 7.6 9.66 11.12 11.2 26.53


Are switch flickers worth3.5x more that Teachers?


How much do Tube Drivers get

I would not use the word earn.

Funny when it is a problem with a monopoly supplier of goods and services that we are angry, outraged and the Usuals scream from the rooftops "it's not fair".
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
Affa
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Rich
Aug 7 2015, 11:48 AM
Affa
Aug 7 2015, 11:44 AM
Ewill
Aug 7 2015, 11:33 AM
This action comes after 18 months of attempting to negotiate with London Underground management. They are very much a last resort.
Intransigence which will cost LU £millions in lost revenue.>>

Posted like the true union apologist you've always been

It's always ''management'' fault in the eyes of chip laden lefties ,
Not at all!
I regard TU militancy as a curse on society.
I also recognise that TU militancy is the result of management's refusal to consulate with and come to agreement with worker representatives before presenting structural changes they wish to implement ..... we get
the the sort of Union that management create - Militants when there is no consultation - Negotiators when there is consultation.

Are you telling me that for a whole 18 months neither side has met and spoken to each other?
According to tssa (union) that is so ...... it's on their web page I linked to. There have been no meaningful negotiations, LU refusing to enter into settlement through consultation - intransigent!



Edited by Affa, Aug 7 2015, 04:49 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pro Veritas
Upstanding Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Jessamy Bride
Aug 7 2015, 07:47 AM
Its no more difficult a job than loads of other professions.....which aren't as well rewarded.
How many of those equally difficult professions involve taking moral and legal responsibility for hundreds of total strangers every day?

I bet you can't name three.

All The Best
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RJD
Member Avatar
Prudence and Thrift
[ *  *  *  * ]
Pro Veritas
Aug 7 2015, 04:23 PM
Jessamy Bride
Aug 7 2015, 07:47 AM
Its no more difficult a job than loads of other professions.....which aren't as well rewarded.
How many of those equally difficult professions involve taking moral and legal responsibility for hundreds of total strangers every day?

I bet you can't name three.

All The Best
Police
Bus Drive
Taxi Driver
Army, Navy etch. NCO
Nurses
Teachers
Require more?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affa
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]

It's disturbing how party politics determines how people respond to otherwise non political events/disputes.
I am quite prepared to believe and accept that the Unions are capable of being difficult to deal with, can be over demanding. What I can't believe is that employers never underhanded.


Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pro Veritas
Upstanding Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
RJD
Aug 7 2015, 04:51 PM
Pro Veritas
Aug 7 2015, 04:23 PM
Jessamy Bride
Aug 7 2015, 07:47 AM
Its no more difficult a job than loads of other professions.....which aren't as well rewarded.
How many of those equally difficult professions involve taking moral and legal responsibility for hundreds of total strangers every day?

I bet you can't name three.

All The Best
Police
Bus Drive
Taxi Driver
Army, Navy etch. NCO
Nurses
Teachers
Require more?
Police: Really? Every single day they take legal and responsibility for the lives of hundreds of people? That's not to suggest they don't earn their pay, they do; but most police officers will not got to work knowing they will hold such responsibility all day, every day.

Bus Driver: Yep, I'll agree with that.

Taxi Driver: Nope. I doubt most taxi drivers carry one hundred passengers a day, never mind hundreds of passengers.

Army, Navy Etc: While I don't think most of them will hold such responsibility every single day of their working life, my position has long been that government does not value our armed forces as much as they deserve.

Nurses: I would imagine that most nurses hold more acute and immediate moral and legal responsibility for the patients they do cover, but I doubt any nurse does so for literally hundreds of patients every day.

Teachers: Possibly. But aren't you one of those who thinks teachers should be subject to performance related pay reviews. Bit hypocritical of you to use them in this manner if you do.

Require More?

Yes, you've got only one who meets the criteria I set, I asked for three.

Every single tube drives takes legal and moral responsibility for hundreds of passengers every day, on some lines that will be every single journey.

Bus Driver is the obvious choice here, but you'd be hard pressed to find another.

Airline Pilot, Cruise Ship Captain, Passenger Ferry Captain.

About the only roles you'll find with the same level of responsibility for the lives of others in such numbers are all involved in mass passenger transit operations.

The current S Stock rolling stock used on some lines have a capacity of 865 (S7) and 1003 (S8). That's a lot of people to take responsibility for on a daily basis.

All The Best
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ewill
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Affa
Aug 7 2015, 11:53 AM
Rich
Aug 7 2015, 11:48 AM
Affa
Aug 7 2015, 11:44 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Are you telling me that for a whole 18 months neither side has met and spoken to each other?
According to tssa (union) that is so ...... it's on their web page I linked to. There have been no meaningful negotiations, LU refusing to enter into settlement through consultation - intransigent!



So the meetings in the interim haven't gone the union's way? management wouldn't give in to the militants

Tssa confirms this by stating that there have been ''no meaningful meetings''

Union apologists like you call this no meetings and blame management
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affa
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Boris has refused to enter into negotiations ....... intransigence!

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
johnofgwent
Member Avatar
It .. It is GREEN !!
[ *  *  *  * ]
papasmurf
Aug 5 2015, 08:43 AM
Ewill
Aug 5 2015, 08:39 AM


There are no drivers on DLR

Which is why I am never likely to be a passenger on it.
I rode it all the time when I had to go up to "head office"

But then again, twelve years before that, I was on the team that created the atp and ato for it.

I'd sooner ride a system of my creation than one developed by a bunch of people who've never seen the tubes it has to operate in.

At least that way I know who to blame if it derails, and they'll be joining me in hell for it (not that I believe in such a place)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
johnofgwent
Member Avatar
It .. It is GREEN !!
[ *  *  *  * ]
Pro Veritas
Aug 7 2015, 04:23 PM
Jessamy Bride
Aug 7 2015, 07:47 AM
Its no more difficult a job than loads of other professions.....which aren't as well rewarded.
How many of those equally difficult professions involve taking moral and legal responsibility for hundreds of total strangers every day?

I bet you can't name three.

All The Best
air traffic control system designer

nuclear power plant designer

automated train protection system designer

aircraft designer

and for that matter, almost any architect or structural engineer in the high rise office business

They all went to work for about six, twelve and four years respectively for the first three and **** knows how long on the other two day in, day out, knowing that for the next thirty / fifty / forty years **MILLIONS** of lives would rely on them having done their job right.

Oh did I mention I did the first two 1993-1990 at Ferranti Computer Systems Ltd (and designed the safety critical test for the reactor control system too, but thank *** i wasn't a C.Eng so someone else had to sign off my work ... and I did the third at westinghouse brake and signal.

Edited by johnofgwent, Aug 7 2015, 08:18 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ewill
Aug 7 2015, 10:36 AM
Rich
Aug 7 2015, 10:33 AM
ACH1967
Aug 7 2015, 09:50 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
I would find another job.
Normal people would find other jobs- not so unionised sheep
Would normal people offer a deal and after acceptance change the deal they offered ? Hmm :rubchin:

I think a large section of the British (clearly not all) left the serf mentality along with the 'yes sir, no sir touch of the forelock sir' behind, a few generations back.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ewill
Aug 7 2015, 05:35 PM
Affa
Aug 7 2015, 11:53 AM
Rich
Aug 7 2015, 11:48 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
According to tssa (union) that is so ...... it's on their web page I linked to. There have been no meaningful negotiations, LU refusing to enter into settlement through consultation - intransigent!



So the meetings in the interim haven't gone the union's way? management wouldn't give in to the militants

Tssa confirms this by stating that there have been ''no meaningful meetings''

Union apologists like you call this no meetings and blame management
Would you care to post your definition of 'no meaningful negotiations' ?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pro Veritas
Upstanding Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
johnofgwent
Aug 7 2015, 08:17 PM
air traffic control system designer

nuclear power plant designer

automated train protection system designer

aircraft designer

and for that matter, almost any architect or structural engineer in the high rise office business
Disagree.

Once the design is finalised, and approved, and then built the designer takes no moral or legal responsibility for the day to day usage of those systems.

And even if you could argue they did, it is nothing like the immediate responsibility that those who work in mass passenger transit work with.

If you design system XYZ and it is put into effect, the designer does not take hands-on responsibility for that system on a daily basis.

The operators may; but not the designer.

Train/Tube drivers and other mass transit drivers/pilots take hands-on, immediate responsibility in a way that I don't think any other occupation does.

All The Best
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
johnofgwent
Member Avatar
It .. It is GREEN !!
[ *  *  *  * ]
Pro Veritas
Aug 7 2015, 09:53 PM
johnofgwent
Aug 7 2015, 08:17 PM
air traffic control system designer

nuclear power plant designer

automated train protection system designer

aircraft designer

and for that matter, almost any architect or structural engineer in the high rise office business
Disagree.

Once the design is finalised, and approved, and then built the designer takes no moral or legal responsibility for the day to day usage of those systems.

And even if you could argue they did, it is nothing like the immediate responsibility that those who work in mass passenger transit work with.

If you design system XYZ and it is put into effect, the designer does not take hands-on responsibility for that system on a daily basis.

The operators may; but not the designer.

Train/Tube drivers and other mass transit drivers/pilots take hands-on, immediate responsibility in a way that I don't think any other occupation does.

All The Best
Well, thanks for the vote of confidence, but I doubt I'll be getting my claim to have been mis-sold the need for PII through like the PPI ones anytime soon.



Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
Pro Veritas
Aug 7 2015, 09:53 PM
johnofgwent
Aug 7 2015, 08:17 PM
air traffic control system designer

nuclear power plant designer

automated train protection system designer

aircraft designer

and for that matter, almost any architect or structural engineer in the high rise office business
Disagree.

Once the design is finalised, and approved, and then built the designer takes no moral or legal responsibility for the day to day usage of those systems.

And even if you could argue they did, it is nothing like the immediate responsibility that those who work in mass passenger transit work with.

If you design system XYZ and it is put into effect, the designer does not take hands-on responsibility for that system on a daily basis.

The operators may; but not the designer.

Train/Tube drivers and other mass transit drivers/pilots take hands-on, immediate responsibility in a way that I don't think any other occupation does.

All The Best
No that's wrong

In the UK (and most countries) the operator take responsibility just for the operation but the designer and especially the design certifier takes responsibility for errors in the design and the manufacturer for errors in the build or build certification. I know this having held most of those roles and having sought and received legal advice. Design includes the operating and maintenance manuals.

In the UK in addition to Health and Safety law this can include jail for manslaughter at an individual or corporate level. That applies even if the system was built and operated abroad. The only real defence is if you can show you understood and then took every reasonable step practical to preclude risk. The rows I've had with dodgy designers and their managers. The rows the MoD has had within itself over Chinooks etc.

In the USA though there is a massive legal immunity on any federal government contract and subsequent subcontracts and in general their legal liabilities are limited to insurable civil liability.



Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rich
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Affa
Aug 7 2015, 11:53 AM
Rich
Aug 7 2015, 11:48 AM
Affa
Aug 7 2015, 11:44 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Are you telling me that for a whole 18 months neither side has met and spoken to each other?
According to tssa (union) that is so ...... it's on their web page I linked to. There have been no meaningful negotiations, LU refusing to enter into settlement through consultation - intransigent!



But it takes two to tango. ;-)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
The basic problem here is LU made an agreement with the unions some years ago and now wants to renege on it. It may have been a dumb agreement to make and it may in the long term be best if it is torn up but if you have an agreement and unilaterally seek to tear it up you cannot claim the moral high ground.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
RJD
Member Avatar
Prudence and Thrift
[ *  *  *  * ]
Pro Veritas
Aug 7 2015, 09:53 PM
johnofgwent
Aug 7 2015, 08:17 PM
air traffic control system designer

nuclear power plant designer

automated train protection system designer

aircraft designer

and for that matter, almost any architect or structural engineer in the high rise office business
Disagree.

Once the design is finalised, and approved, and then built the designer takes no moral or legal responsibility for the day to day usage of those systems.

And even if you could argue they did, it is nothing like the immediate responsibility that those who work in mass passenger transit work with.

If you design system XYZ and it is put into effect, the designer does not take hands-on responsibility for that system on a daily basis.

The operators may; but not the designer.

Train/Tube drivers and other mass transit drivers/pilots take hands-on, immediate responsibility in a way that I don't think any other occupation does.

All The Best
You claim that the Drivers take responsibility for lives, surely that first and foremost includes their own. Me thinks your claim is bogus and illogical. The only question of merit is the one the Usuals refuse to answer and that is based on relative worth.
Robot trains will now be higher up the agenda.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Lewis
Member Avatar
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
RJD
Aug 8 2015, 06:26 AM
Pro Veritas
Aug 7 2015, 09:53 PM
johnofgwent
Aug 7 2015, 08:17 PM
air traffic control system designer

nuclear power plant designer

automated train protection system designer

aircraft designer

and for that matter, almost any architect or structural engineer in the high rise office business
Disagree.

Once the design is finalised, and approved, and then built the designer takes no moral or legal responsibility for the day to day usage of those systems.

And even if you could argue they did, it is nothing like the immediate responsibility that those who work in mass passenger transit work with.

If you design system XYZ and it is put into effect, the designer does not take hands-on responsibility for that system on a daily basis.

The operators may; but not the designer.

Train/Tube drivers and other mass transit drivers/pilots take hands-on, immediate responsibility in a way that I don't think any other occupation does.

All The Best
You claim that the Drivers take responsibility for lives, surely that first and foremost includes their own. Me thinks your claim is bogus and illogical. The only question of merit is the one the Usuals refuse to answer and that is based on relative worth.
Robot trains will now be higher up the agenda.
Talking about relative worth, how much do merchant b(w)ankers and stockbrokers together with tory politicians.

The first two rip us off and the third makes peoples lives a misery. Whereas train drivers are responsible for the lives of hundreds of people, but get paid a pittance in comparison to the scroungers I've mentioned! Yet if all the Tory politicians and bankers were swallowed up by the flames of hell, the country would still function as if they never existed (arguably better).
Edited by Lewis, Aug 8 2015, 06:54 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
johnofgwent
Member Avatar
It .. It is GREEN !!
[ *  *  *  * ]
RJD
Aug 8 2015, 06:26 AM
You claim that the Drivers take responsibility for lives, surely that first and foremost includes their own.

...

Robot trains will now be higher up the agenda.
Well, why don't we ask the driver of the train at Ladbroke Grove, or Moorgate ... or pretty much pick almost any serious incident.

Oh hang on, you can't.

Because when several hundred tons of metalwork doing a reasonable rate of knots piles into a solid object it ends up a good forty foot shorter than when it started and anything remotely organic in it ends up intimately associated with the brickwork / metalwork.

"Robot Trains" have been on the agenda since the day I finished the user acceptance test on the ATO for the Jubilee Line extension and my opposite number finished a similar acceptance on the ATP side. And those documents were written on a PC running Windows for Workgroups and Windows 95 was about to launch ...

But all this is getting away from the problem, methinks.

These days aircraft pilots are not there to "fly the plane". They are there to "fly the plane when shit has happenned and the plane is next to unflyable". I think the same is increasingly the case for rail ...
Edited by johnofgwent, Aug 8 2015, 07:46 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
johnofgwent
Member Avatar
It .. It is GREEN !!
[ *  *  *  * ]
Lewis
Aug 8 2015, 06:50 AM
Talking about relative worth, how much do merchant b(w)ankers and stockbrokers together with tory politicians.

The first two rip us off and the third makes peoples lives a misery. Whereas train drivers are responsible for the lives of hundreds of people, but get paid a pittance in comparison to the scroungers I've mentioned! Yet if all the Tory politicians and bankers were swallowed up by the flames of hell, the country would still function as if they never existed (arguably better).


Well, the problem with your ideology is that you seem to overlook the need to swallow up the labour, liberal democrat, SNP and indeed all the other politicians and leave the people to get on with our lives unfettered by these equal parasites.

The argument for the deconstruction of statism is hardly a new one.
Edited by johnofgwent, Aug 8 2015, 07:53 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Oddball
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
papasmurf
Aug 6 2015, 10:43 AM
Oddball2
Aug 6 2015, 10:32 AM
especially with all the personal and family bennies added in.
You are somewhat out of date with the benefit cap and welfare reforms. Plus personally I would not be a teacher for the same pay as a tube train driver, unless I were issued with body armour and a cattle prod.
I was thinking more of the railway bennies, free travel and the like. An 'uncle-in-law' of mine was a lowly station porter, but he did get bennies that included free family travel inclusive of an annual European rail travel {holiday in mind].
Edited by Oddball, Aug 8 2015, 07:59 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affa
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]

How ridiculous it is to be critical of the pay of train drivers when the dispute is not essentially about pay though of course that is also negotiable.
The issue here is as I have repeatedly raised - intransigence.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Affa
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
johnofgwent
Aug 8 2015, 07:52 AM


The argument for the deconstruction of statism is hardly a new one.
I frequently label the State as "the enemy of the people", but that does not mean I advocate anarchy.
We deserve a State that regards itself as a servant of the people .........
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pro Veritas
Upstanding Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Steve K
Aug 7 2015, 11:56 PM
No that's wrong

In the UK (and most countries) the operator take responsibility just for the operation but the designer and especially the design certifier takes responsibility for errors in the design and the manufacturer for errors in the build or build certification. I know this having held most of those roles and having sought and received legal advice. Design includes the operating and maintenance manuals.

In the UK in addition to Health and Safety law this can include jail for manslaughter at an individual or corporate level. That applies even if the system was built and operated abroad. The only real defence is if you can show you understood and then took every reasonable step practical to preclude risk. The rows I've had with dodgy designers and their managers. The rows the MoD has had within itself over Chinooks etc.

In the USA though there is a massive legal immunity on any federal government contract and subsequent subcontracts and in general their legal liabilities are limited to insurable civil liability.



Yes, I understand that.

But they don't take day-to-day hands-on responsibility in the way that a Mass Transit System Driver does, do they?

The designer/certifier isn't there every day taking direct responsibility for those that use his/her designs.

All The Best
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ewill
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Aug 7 2015, 09:39 PM
Ewill
Aug 7 2015, 10:36 AM
Rich
Aug 7 2015, 10:33 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Normal people would find other jobs- not so unionised sheep
Would normal people offer a deal and after acceptance change the deal they offered ? Hmm :rubchin:

I think a large section of the British (clearly not all) left the serf mentality along with the 'yes sir, no sir touch of the forelock sir' behind, a few generations back.
Normal people wanted to shop on Sundays , and buy petrol 24/7/365 - normal people wanted to bank after 3

The business models had to accommodate this

Those workers needed to have shifts changed to accommodate and did so , they can opt out of Sundays working if wanted, automation took over the shortfall

Tube staff will not have to work extra weekends or hours, they are also to get a pay rise and work bonuses and still they strike, more automation is the answer

If they don't like it they should resign and go elsewhere
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 10:10 AM
C-too
Aug 7 2015, 09:39 PM
Ewill
Aug 7 2015, 10:36 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Would normal people offer a deal and after acceptance change the deal they offered ? Hmm :rubchin:

I think a large section of the British (clearly not all) left the serf mentality along with the 'yes sir, no sir touch of the forelock sir' behind, a few generations back.
Normal people wanted to shop on Sundays , and buy petrol 24/7/365 - normal people wanted to bank after 3
The business models had to accommodate this
Those workers needed to have shifts changed to accommodate and did so , they can opt out of Sundays working if wanted, automation took over the shortfall

Tube staff will not have to work extra weekends or hours, they are also to get a pay rise and work bonuses and still they strike, more automation is the answer

If they don't like it they should resign and go elsewhere
If they have real grievances then no, they should not resign and go elsewhere.

With your strong opinions and 'answers' perhaps you can highlight the reasons given for strike action ?



Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 10:10 AM
. .If they don't like it they should resign and go elsewhere
We have in effect a monopolistic employer and you seem to want to give them carte blanche to exploit that monopoly? Where else can a LU underground driver get a job making use of their skills and experience?



Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
papasmurf
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Aug 8 2015, 10:59 AM
Normal people wanted to shop on Sundays
I doubt many men want to be dragged out to go shopping on a Sunday.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ewill
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Steve K
Aug 8 2015, 11:17 AM
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 10:10 AM
. .If they don't like it they should resign and go elsewhere
We have in effect a monopolistic employer and you seem to want to give them carte blanche to exploit that monopoly? Where else can a LU underground driver get a job making use of their skills and experience?



Anywhere else with a tube system in the UK (or if tube drivers really are as great as they believe they are they could always try their luck in European tube systems)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ewill
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Aug 8 2015, 10:59 AM
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 10:10 AM
C-too
Aug 7 2015, 09:39 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Normal people wanted to shop on Sundays , and buy petrol 24/7/365 - normal people wanted to bank after 3
The business models had to accommodate this
Those workers needed to have shifts changed to accommodate and did so , they can opt out of Sundays working if wanted, automation took over the shortfall

Tube staff will not have to work extra weekends or hours, they are also to get a pay rise and work bonuses and still they strike, more automation is the answer

If they don't like it they should resign and go elsewhere
If they have real grievances then no, they should not resign and go elsewhere.

With your strong opinions and 'answers' perhaps you can highlight the reasons given for strike action ?



Where's the ''real'' grievance?

They have guaranteed hours, voluntary w/e work. a continued closed shop, extra bonuses and a pay rise

It's a trades union manufactured grievance viz the protect ticket offices bollax-no-one uses ticket offices in tube stations, haven't done for years- it's all Oyster/debit card swipes and ticket machines

Roll on the new strike ballot legislation
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Pro Veritas
Upstanding Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 12:02 PM
Roll on the new strike ballot legislation
And how you will bitch and moan when they use that legislation against you.

I've no idea what job you do, and I don't care.

What I do know is once they make it harder to strike that makes it easier for them to erode other basic working rights.

So if you find yourself forced to work 50/hr weeks for £20 the only person you will have to blame is yourself for supporting this attack on the right to strike.

Do you even understand that for the vast majority of the workforce the right to withdraw their labour is the ONLY means of protest they have to combat and employment system skewed almost entirely in favour of the employer?

If you did understand that, would you care?

Maybe you should go read Martin Niemöller's most famous quote.

All The Best
Edited by Pro Veritas, Aug 8 2015, 12:29 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Jonksy
Member Avatar
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
RJD
Aug 5 2015, 05:51 PM
papasmurf
Aug 5 2015, 05:33 PM
gansao
Aug 5 2015, 05:29 PM


Ah I see. If the hoi polloi can do it then it must be easy .
That does appear to be RJD's mindset.
For some what they find difficult others find to be very easy. Relatively speaking and this is all about relativity, driving such trains is child's play. However, I can understand that some here think it akin to performing open heart surgery. I note that the Usuals are incapable of addressing any of the questions, do they find these too difficult, and resort to the usual. Time they learned and understood that such a stance is expected from that quarter and pigeonholes them in the "not too bright but perhaps nice" brigade. Clearly substantiation is for them an alien process as it is like driving such a train; "far too difficult".

Have you any prove it is an easy job? Of course you haven't yet again the tories supply the bullshit and you fall in line...I bet driving a tube is more skilled than being a tory politician not that it would take much because if the tories were paid on results they would owe the country a fortune..



Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 11:58 AM
Steve K
Aug 8 2015, 11:17 AM
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 10:10 AM
. .If they don't like it they should resign and go elsewhere
We have in effect a monopolistic employer and you seem to want to give them carte blanche to exploit that monopoly? Where else can a LU underground driver get a job making use of their skills and experience?



Anywhere else with a tube system in the UK (or if tube drivers really are as great as they believe they are they could always try their luck in European tube systems)
So they have to sell their house, partner has to change job, kids have to move school, have to lose and make new friends, abandon close relatives they may be responsible for

and they're supposed to be no impediment to a free market?

LU is in an effective monopoly employer position - end of
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rich
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Steve K
Aug 8 2015, 01:19 PM
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 11:58 AM
Steve K
Aug 8 2015, 11:17 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Anywhere else with a tube system in the UK (or if tube drivers really are as great as they believe they are they could always try their luck in European tube systems)
So they have to sell their house, partner has to change job, kids have to move school, have to lose and make new friends, abandon close relatives they may be responsible for

and they're supposed to be no impediment to a free market?

LU is in an effective monopoly employer position - end of
Those from eastern Europe seem to find upping sticks no problem.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 12:02 PM
C-too
Aug 8 2015, 10:59 AM
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 10:10 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
If they have real grievances then no, they should not resign and go elsewhere.

With your strong opinions and 'answers' perhaps you can highlight the reasons given for strike action ?
Where's the ''real'' grievance?
They have guaranteed hours, voluntary w/e work. a continued closed shop, extra bonuses and a pay rise
It's a trades union manufactured grievance viz the protect ticket offices bollax-no-one uses ticket offices in tube stations, haven't done for years- it's all Oyster/debit card swipes and ticket machines
Roll on the new strike ballot legislation
Is the ticket office problem the only grievance ?

Too much control over working people WILL lead to discontent. Remember the decade of discontent under Thatcher ? Increased crime, vandalism, riots ---- ?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Rich
Aug 8 2015, 06:37 PM
Steve K
Aug 8 2015, 01:19 PM
Ewill
Aug 8 2015, 11:58 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
So they have to sell their house, partner has to change job, kids have to move school, have to lose and make new friends, abandon close relatives they may be responsible for

and they're supposed to be no impediment to a free market?

LU is in an effective monopoly employer position - end of
Those from eastern Europe seem to find upping sticks no problem.
:'( ----- :facepalm:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ewill
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
And how you will bitch and moan when they use that legislation against you.>>

Nope
I understand completely the need for a flexible workforce and I still fail to understand why workers on £50k+ ,free travel for uncle Tom Cobly and all, being given the same guaranteed hours, voluntary w/e working, a pay rise , work bonuses can simply be allowed to strike at whim
It's still the public sector unionised mentality which prevails- union sheep don't appear to realise that they are losing money whilst keeping their huge salaried union bosses in work

So if you find yourself forced to work 50/hr weeks for £20 >>

Tube drivers aren't

for the vast majority of the workforce the right to withdraw their labour is the ONLY means of protest they have to combat and employment system >>

Vast majority?

More like union sheep

If people don't like their place of work any longer they are free to find employment elsewhere - nothing stopping them. Normal people change employment whenever they want
Edited by Ewill, Aug 8 2015, 08:01 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ewill
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
>>So they have to sell their house, partner has to change job, kids have to move school, have to lose and make new friends, abandon close relatives they may be responsible for >>

East Europeans and multinational company workers have no problem doing so

Think of the opportunities available by broadening horizons
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Aug 8 2015, 07:39 PM
Is the ticket office problem the only grievance ?

No, as per the RMT link I posted earlier there are safety and work/life balance issues.

Quote:
 
Too much control over working people WILL lead to discontent. Remember the decade of discontent under Thatcher ? Increased crime, vandalism, riots ---- ?
Yep
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Well lets face it if a load of waste of space bankers and traders don't go into work the country is probably a slightly better place for the duration, but if a couple of hundred train drivers stay at home London is in chaos!

Just shows the relative values of some folks eh?

;-)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
DealsFor.me - The best sales, coupons, and discounts for you
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic »
Add Reply