| Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Labour needs a female to lead them? | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Aug 25 2015, 06:06 PM (413 Views) | |
| RJD | Aug 25 2015, 06:06 PM Post #1 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() Burnham thinks the time is not yet right, but if Corbyn can from nowhere get so much support then why not a Tower Hamlets Totty? |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| RJD | Aug 28 2015, 04:31 PM Post #41 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Who employed you? |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Aug 28 2015, 04:41 PM Post #42 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Bad situation? It was a national disaster with every nationalised industry overmanned, subsidised and making products, that increasingly nobody wished to purchase. Privatising those basket cases was the best thing she ever did. There is no evidence anywhere that indicates that those industries owned and controlled by the State would ever be other than a massive burden holding back the UK economy. Clearly those with strong feelings against the Lady are free to substantiate their claims. Otherwise usual ignorant sour grapes from the Usuals who cannot swallow the fact that it took a woman to do what their men failed to tackle decisively. Anyone today who thinks that returning the Railways and Utilities to State control is ignorant and in my view p[lain bonkers. The problem with the railways is fundamentally with the "not for profit" quasi-natiuonalised NetworkRail. Be warned. Mind you lefties do not give a sh1t whether such industries need heavy subsidies as long as you take it out of the pockets of those filthy rich bastards. |
![]() |
|
| Affa | Aug 28 2015, 06:02 PM Post #43 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nationalised Industries and Services performed badly because they were managed badly by their owners ....... which predominantly was Conservative governments that are ideologically opposed to Nationalisation and had no intention of making them a success. It was tantamount to putting paedophiles in charge of schools ...... a recipe for disaster. |
![]() |
|
| disgruntled porker | Aug 29 2015, 06:27 AM Post #44 |
|
Older than most people think I am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What's this; the fucking Spanish inquisition. I don't ask personal details about your work history. I don't ask who you worked for, when, how long, what did you earn, how long were tea breaks. I have no intention of giving a detailed history of my life to the likes of you, so give it a rest eh? Edited by disgruntled porker, Aug 29 2015, 06:57 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| RJD | Aug 29 2015, 02:57 PM Post #45 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thought so. The answer would be embarrassing. |
![]() |
|
| marybrown | Aug 29 2015, 03:00 PM Post #46 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Labour needs anyone to lead them until David Miliband makes a re-appearance.. |
![]() |
|
| Tytoalba | Aug 29 2015, 05:25 PM Post #47 |
|
Senior Member
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just more self deception Affa. All the utilities and services have improved in supply and quality and in infrastructure by a big margin since privatisation. |
![]() |
|
| disgruntled porker | Aug 30 2015, 06:23 AM Post #48 |
|
Older than most people think I am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Why would working for a living be embarrassing. Fool. |
![]() |
|
| Steve K | Aug 30 2015, 10:07 AM Post #49 |
|
Once and future cynic
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Perhaps RJD has never read rule 6. It is plain common sense not to give away details that could allow someone to identify you. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Aug 30 2015, 01:14 PM Post #50 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nice side-step but you fool nobody. |
![]() |
|
| RJD | Aug 30 2015, 01:16 PM Post #51 |
|
Prudence and Thrift
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Good job I did not do that then! I have no interest in his or anyone's personal information and indicating the sector of employment would not allow me to determine such. Despite popular belief I do not own a crystal ball. |
![]() |
|
| disgruntled porker | Aug 30 2015, 01:39 PM Post #52 |
|
Older than most people think I am.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Come off it Torquemada. You were fishing, but the bait wasn't disguised cunningly enough. When you catch a weasel asleep, piss in it's ear hole. Firstly you asked if I was employed at a certain time. I told you yes. You then asked what job I did. I told you. Then you wanted to delve even further. When was your curiosity going to be satisfied? What I told you was quite enough information for the question. Edited by disgruntled porker, Aug 30 2015, 01:42 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Politics · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2




![]](http://z5.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)





8:31 AM Jul 11