Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
D Trump; + merges
Topic Started: Jan 7 2017, 07:31 AM (1,589 Views)
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Donald trump agrees that there was Russian interference in the election, but he says it did not influence the outcome of the election.

No influence on the outcome because he says so !jk! IMO he has exposed his Mr Smart Mouth immaturity.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 12:48 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 12:37 PM
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 12:29 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
GOT IT IN ONE BOYO :thumbsup:

And Bazookas,and hand grenades,and machine guns.

Guns,phew their for wimps :P
Gun rights in the US are bordering on a form of metal illness, the idea back in the 18th century was that an armed populace was the best defence against government.

Roll on 200 odd years and the ownership of muskets has been replaced with the ownership of heavy machine guns, pistols with extended magazines and the worship of firearms! But the government has stealth jets and drones!

Bit sick isn't it given the tens of thousands of Americans who die at the hands of other Americans every single year?
Quite true,

Would'nt you say we have moved on from the musket nowadays ? :facepalm: !jk!

That pretty nifty AR15 replaces it !moon!

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Steve K
Feb 3 2017, 01:00 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 12:53 PM
Steve K
Feb 3 2017, 12:46 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
So are 65 million others who put trump in office.Funny thing that,don't ya think ?
:facepalm:
You saying they are so illiterate they can't read it?

https://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm

I would say that the average American has not only read it,but is slightly more up on it than you will ever be. It is the arrogance of the left,ESPECIALLY in another country to tell citizens of that country they know best.Don't ya think ? :banghead:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 01:04 PM
Steve K
Feb 3 2017, 01:00 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 12:53 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
You saying they are so illiterate they can't read it?

https://www.senate.gov/civics/constitution_item/constitution.htm

I would say that the average American has not only read it,but is slightly more up on it than you will ever be. It is the arrogance of the left,ESPECIALLY in another country to tell citizens of that country they know best.Don't ya think ? :banghead:
Well let's recap

You said you wanted to see more protest on the US streets so your tobacco chewing gun toting would be friends would be provoked to go out on the streets and shoot them

And you think the US Constitution blesses such?  ::)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Steve K
Feb 3 2017, 01:08 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 01:04 PM
Steve K
Feb 3 2017, 01:00 PM
I would say that the average American has not only read it,but is slightly more up on it than you will ever be. It is the arrogance of the left,ESPECIALLY in another country to tell citizens of that country they know best.Don't ya think ? :banghead:
Well let's recap

You said you wanted to see more protest on the US streets so your tobacco chewing gun toting would be friends would be provoked to go out on the streets and shoot them

And you think the US Constitution blesses such?  ::)
"YOU SAID." Did I,where ?

Show me where I stated," I WANT TO SEE MORE PROTEST ? "

I have a feeling you may be shamed into an apology,IF I feel I want one !jk!

But no need to apologise,as I am not a wet Left wing fascist.

Edited by xosg, Feb 3 2017, 01:39 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 12:48 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 12:37 PM
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 12:29 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
GOT IT IN ONE BOYO :thumbsup:

And Bazookas,and hand grenades,and machine guns.

Guns,phew their for wimps :P
Gun rights in the US are bordering on a form of metal illness, the idea back in the 18th century was that an armed populace was the best defence against government.

Roll on 200 odd years and the ownership of muskets has been replaced with the ownership of heavy machine guns, pistols with extended magazines and the worship of firearms! But the government has stealth jets and drones!

Bit sick isn't it given the tens of thousands of Americans who die at the hands of other Americans every single year?
Don't mistake my mild calm manner as a sign of weakness :thumbsup:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Happy Hornet
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 12:06 PM
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 08:49 AM
Gnikkk
Feb 3 2017, 07:41 AM
He got voted in on a promise to do some things, this included. He does it and the anti-democratic so called 'democrats' and other lovies don't like it, tough they lost the election according to the rules under which they agreed to participate. Now I see a comparison of 1.7 million (ban) with 300K (allow), farcical. Time frame far different and also the vociferous nature of left wing bigots takes some beating, nothing better to do once signed on maybe.

At university we went to lectures and then the bar, they the students union meeting to shout at people.
So you have never once criticised a democratically elected government? I find that hard to believe.

Dissent is a crucial to the survival of democracy.
Yes dissent is crucial.

Not firebombing buildings,attacking people.

All I say is keep it up.

The right are starting to lose their patience with more commentators on the web saying they are pushing to far.

Now I don't know about you.But if only a tiny minority of the people who voted trump come out,to meet these fookin idiots head on,there is only gonna be one winner.As we all know these are republican gun owners and they don't fook about.These state militias can be mean sons of bitches

I do hope the little pieces of crap carry on doing what they are doing.Just to get the right out on the streets
Who here is defending or advocating violence?

Im certainly not.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gnikkk
Regular Member
[ *  *  * ]
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 11:40 AM
Gnikkk
Feb 3 2017, 11:25 AM
If you talk in a non insulting manner and avoid shouting then fine. To contrast discussion with threats and insults is stretching it, hence my 'convoluted' statement. Once people take to the streets and do criminal damage and insight violence then discussion is over and the opportunity for opposition is lost/wasted. Chucking things off buildings in a Ferry style is not democratic. Smashing windows and rioting in the centre of London/New York etc is criminal. To compare what we all see is going on with democracy is crass.
A bit of civil unrest never hurt anyone. ;-)

The more serious point is when you have hideously divided societies such as we now see in the US and UK demonstrations and protests are inevitable, it's the direct result of inequality and social mismanagement that allows millions to be left behind.

Perhaps it's the bullshitting politicians who should take a long hard look at themselves?
I don't see us as hideously divided. A small minority would have us all believe so but that's not the case. Like I said a few million loud mouths shout down the ordinary man who wants a quiet life and just to get on. He's not allowed to hate Johnny Foreigner even though it's pretty clear Johnny et al hates him and his pale skinned matey's. I think the putrid blue eyes don't help either.

Most ordinary folk just want a nice life, if those who didn't try hard at school are fed up then they first need to understand why they are where they are, and that it's nobody else's fault.
Edited by Gnikkk, Feb 3 2017, 02:51 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Happy Hornet
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Gnikkk
Feb 3 2017, 02:50 PM
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 11:40 AM
Gnikkk
Feb 3 2017, 11:25 AM
If you talk in a non insulting manner and avoid shouting then fine. To contrast discussion with threats and insults is stretching it, hence my 'convoluted' statement. Once people take to the streets and do criminal damage and insight violence then discussion is over and the opportunity for opposition is lost/wasted. Chucking things off buildings in a Ferry style is not democratic. Smashing windows and rioting in the centre of London/New York etc is criminal. To compare what we all see is going on with democracy is crass.
A bit of civil unrest never hurt anyone. ;-)

The more serious point is when you have hideously divided societies such as we now see in the US and UK demonstrations and protests are inevitable, it's the direct result of inequality and social mismanagement that allows millions to be left behind.

Perhaps it's the bullshitting politicians who should take a long hard look at themselves?


Most ordinary folk just want a nice life, if those who didn't try hard at school are fed up then they first need to understand why they are where they are, and that it's nobody else's fault.
Typical sneering liberal elite blah, blah, blah.

But seriously, would you say the same thing to people who blame all their woes on immigration and the EU?
Edited by Happy Hornet, Feb 3 2017, 03:07 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tytoalba
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 11:06 AM
Tytoalba
Feb 3 2017, 11:02 AM
Happy Hornet
Feb 2 2017, 06:21 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
HH
I think there is a difference between the intent to offend, and taking offence at what someone may say I understand your sensitivity about your own circumstances, but it does not alter my belief that a multicultural multi religious society does not live in peace with itself, for there have been too many instances around the world where the differences have created internal problems, one of the worst instances was the religious differences when India was portioned. I don't think I should withhold my opinion on a matter that may be sensitive to another poster or withhold it because they as an individual may take offence where none was intended. I have said that sometimes free speech can lead to some one or some group being offended, but I think some things need to be said before he situation that may be referred to gets out of hand. By facing a potential problems we can then address it, not sweep it under the carpet and pretend it doe not exist. Brexit was a consequence of ignoring tee problem of immigration and claiming it was racist to discuss it .
If I start to feel offended at what someone writes, when it is intended or otherwise I ask myself why , and then move on or ignore it for I don't see it as my problem. We are, after all just screen names with a personality.
And this is pretty much what i and a number of others are saying wrt Trump.

I might not like or agree with a lot of what you say, but I respect and defend your right to say it.

All I am asking is that you extend me the same courtesy.

Unreasonable?
Say what you like about who you like, but does it have to be with the very personal insults that we know will offend? That's the point I make. Use the stiletto, not the broadsword so to speak . Destroy them if you must, but use reasoned argument to turn people away from them and their beliefs not shout and holler, or to set out to offend them in the way you wouldn't want people to offend you in return.

Can't we only be offended if we allow ourselves to be, and can't those who try to offend us only do so if we allow ourselves to be offended by what they say or do?
If what they say or do threatens us or ours than that something different altogether, and it is that where Trump is having his biggest impact, and why there is such opposition to him'

You could argue on those terms why so many are opposed to open borders and uncontrolled immigration, that being that they threaten our culture our jobs, and our way of life with their own, which any sensible person will recognise that they do. Didn't the Add to dictionary
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Happy Hornet
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tytoalba
Feb 3 2017, 04:05 PM
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 11:06 AM
Tytoalba
Feb 3 2017, 11:02 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
And this is pretty much what i and a number of others are saying wrt Trump.

I might not like or agree with a lot of what you say, but I respect and defend your right to say it.

All I am asking is that you extend me the same courtesy.

Unreasonable?
Say what you like about who you like, but does it have to be with the very personal insults that we know will offend? That's the point I make. Use the stiletto, not the broadsword so to speak . Destroy them if you must, but use reasoned argument to turn people away from them and their beliefs not shout and holler, or to set out to offend them in the way you wouldn't want people to offend you in return.

Can't we only be offended if we allow ourselves to be, and can't those who try to offend us only do so if we allow ourselves to be offended by what they say or do?
If what they say or do threatens us or ours than that something different altogether, and it is that where Trump is having his biggest impact, and why there is such opposition to him'

You could argue on those terms why so many are opposed to open borders and uncontrolled immigration, that being that they threaten our culture our jobs, and our way of life with their own, which any sensible person will recognise that they do. Didn't the Add to dictionary
Sorry I find this a bit confusing. You start off complaining about personal insults. Who have I insulted exactly?

Besides which, freedom of speech means having the right to be offensive and insulting. If you don't like it don't listen.

But you then seem to go on to complain about others taking offence. It seems to me like you want to have your cake and eat it.

Being President of the USA i inevitably means putting yourself up for scrutiny unlike anyone else on Earth. Regardless of what decisions you make you will come in for flak. This isn't new, if you can't stand the heat......
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tytoalba
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Sorry about the last sentence to previous post

Didn't the conquistadors effectively destroy the Aztecs, European settlers destroy the way of life in the USA and in Australia and New Zealand, and in Fiji haven't the immigrants from India now exceed in numbers the native population? What will happen when the Muslims in the UK exceed the Christians, do you not think that they will then be running our councils in some areas and eventually the government like the Indians did in Fiji?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Happy Hornet
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tytoalba
Feb 3 2017, 04:14 PM
Sorry about the last sentence to previous post

Didn't the conquistadors effectively destroy the Aztecs, European settlers destroy the way of life in the USA and in Australia and New Zealand, and in Fiji haven't the immigrants from India now exceed in numbers the native population? What will happen when the Muslims in the UK exceed the Christians, do you not think that they will then be running our councils in some areas and eventually the government like the Indians did in Fiji?
What's this got to do with Donald Trump?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 01:38 PM
Steve K
Feb 3 2017, 01:08 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 01:04 PM
Well let's recap

You said you wanted to see more protest on the US streets so your tobacco chewing gun toting would be friends would be provoked to go out on the streets and shoot them

And you think the US Constitution blesses such?  ::)
"YOU SAID." Did I,where ?

Show me where I stated," I WANT TO SEE MORE PROTEST ? "

I have a feeling you may be shamed into an apology,IF I feel I want one !jk!

But no need to apologise,as I am not a wet Left wing fascist.

Try reading your own post 1050

http://w11.zetaboards.com/UK_Debate_Mk_2/single/?p=10030279&t=30124766
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rich
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 08:49 AM
Gnikkk
Feb 3 2017, 07:41 AM
He got voted in on a promise to do some things, this included. He does it and the anti-democratic so called 'democrats' and other lovies don't like it, tough they lost the election according to the rules under which they agreed to participate. Now I see a comparison of 1.7 million (ban) with 300K (allow), farcical. Time frame far different and also the vociferous nature of left wing bigots takes some beating, nothing better to do once signed on maybe.

At university we went to lectures and then the bar, they the students union meeting to shout at people.
So you have never once criticised a democratically elected government? I find that hard to believe.

Dissent is a crucial to the survival of democracy.
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn is testament to that......oh wait, was that a 3 line whip, you say? ;-)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 04:13 PM
Tytoalba
Feb 3 2017, 04:05 PM
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 11:06 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Say what you like about who you like, but does it have to be with the very personal insults that we know will offend? That's the point I make. Use the stiletto, not the broadsword so to speak . Destroy them if you must, but use reasoned argument to turn people away from them and their beliefs not shout and holler, or to set out to offend them in the way you wouldn't want people to offend you in return.

Can't we only be offended if we allow ourselves to be, and can't those who try to offend us only do so if we allow ourselves to be offended by what they say or do?
If what they say or do threatens us or ours than that something different altogether, and it is that where Trump is having his biggest impact, and why there is such opposition to him'

You could argue on those terms why so many are opposed to open borders and uncontrolled immigration, that being that they threaten our culture our jobs, and our way of life with their own, which any sensible person will recognise that they do. Didn't the Add to dictionary
Sorry I find this a bit confusing. You start off complaining about personal insults. Who have I insulted exactly?

Besides which, freedom of speech means having the right to be offensive and insulting. If you don't like it don't listen.

But you then seem to go on to complain about others taking offence. It seems to me like you want to have your cake and eat it.

Being President of the USA i inevitably means putting yourself up for scrutiny unlike anyone else on Earth. Regardless of what decisions you make you will come in for flak. This isn't new, if you can't stand the heat......
Besides which, freedom of speech means having the right to be offensive and insulting. If you don't like it don't listen.

That's a bit rich coming from you lefties.Pity you don't practice what you preach on a daily basis
Edited by xosg, Feb 3 2017, 05:02 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
marybrown
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Donald Trump is considering banning people with a dual British passport who have come from any of the countries that he has banned..

So Stevek..it is a British passport???
Edited by marybrown, Feb 3 2017, 05:31 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
marybrown
Feb 3 2017, 05:12 PM
Donald Trump is considering banning people with a dual British passport who have come from any of the countries that he has banned..

So Stevek..it is a British passport???
Wha? Sorry don't understand but I know I've never seen a dual passport
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Gnikkk
Feb 3 2017, 10:26 AM
A rather insulting and immature post. care to explain?
My last comment should have ben a good indicator.

NL were NOT a disaster for the country, so posting that they were suggests a lack of understanding, which may arise due to a lack of years on your part. i.e. you are possibly a rather young individual with strong opinions. And that would mean that any immaturity would be on your part.
Alternatively you may be an older individual that has allowed biased insinuations in the Tory press to mould your opinions for you. Either way your comment made no sense.

You say that NL created a chronic legacy that we are now trying to address. Does that mean that the chronic legacy that has befallen Western economise since 2008 and is now affecting world economies was created by NL ? Clearly that is not the case, so you must be missing out part of the equation.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tytoalba
Feb 3 2017, 10:41 AM
C-too
Feb 2 2017, 07:57 AM
Tytoalba
Feb 1 2017, 01:13 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
---"TO SOME"---
You are right, there are some morons who don't think so. If you have a daughter how would you feel if Trump, uninvited, had stuck his hand between her legs and then boasted that he could do this sort of thing because you can get away with it when you're very rich ?

You seem to think you can make excuses for anything, just because you can put words together. .... :facepalm:

Wealth has nothing to do with it, for the poor can do much the same, but perhaps power does, but your hyperbole is exaggerated and the word rich opportunist. As for morons why not just substitute it for some people. for sexual abusers are not necessarily stupid people, they come from all walks of life and levels of intelligence.
I didn't say wealth did, but apparently Trump did say you can do this sort of thing when you are very rich.

SO ONCE AGAIN YOU IGNORE THE CONTEXT AND RAMBLE ON DOWN SOME HIDE AWAY TANGENT. :facepalm:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
C-too
Member Avatar
Honourable Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Rich
Feb 3 2017, 04:55 PM
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 08:49 AM
Gnikkk
Feb 3 2017, 07:41 AM
He got voted in on a promise to do some things, this included. He does it and the anti-democratic so called 'democrats' and other lovies don't like it, tough they lost the election according to the rules under which they agreed to participate. Now I see a comparison of 1.7 million (ban) with 300K (allow), farcical. Time frame far different and also the vociferous nature of left wing bigots takes some beating, nothing better to do once signed on maybe.

At university we went to lectures and then the bar, they the students union meeting to shout at people.
So you have never once criticised a democratically elected government? I find that hard to believe.

Dissent is a crucial to the survival of democracy.
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn is testament to that......oh wait, was that a 3 line whip, you say? ;-)
You can't impose a three line whip on public opinion. ;-)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Happy Hornet
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 05:01 PM
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 04:13 PM
Tytoalba
Feb 3 2017, 04:05 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Sorry I find this a bit confusing. You start off complaining about personal insults. Who have I insulted exactly?

Besides which, freedom of speech means having the right to be offensive and insulting. If you don't like it don't listen.

But you then seem to go on to complain about others taking offence. It seems to me like you want to have your cake and eat it.

Being President of the USA i inevitably means putting yourself up for scrutiny unlike anyone else on Earth. Regardless of what decisions you make you will come in for flak. This isn't new, if you can't stand the heat......
Besides which, freedom of speech means having the right to be offensive and insulting. If you don't like it don't listen.

That's a bit rich coming from you lefties.Pity you don't practice what you preach on a daily basis
I'm not a leftie, I've never believed in partisan politics and recent events have only strengthened this belief.

I see the right already beginning to repeat the same mistakes the left made, drunk on power, putting ideology before country, cracking down on dissent and dismissing anyone who disagrees as anti-democratic or "liberal elite" just as the keft used terms like "racist" for the same reason. Just watch as the so called liberal elite grows when the economic miracles promised by Trump and Brexiters fail to materialise.

Then watch in a few years when the left climb back on top and do the exact same thing. The words might change but it's the same old song.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
I see he's not exactly turning around that net unpopularity

http://www.gallup.com/poll/201617/gallup-daily-trump-job-approval.aspx
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 01:01 PM


That pretty nifty AR15 replaces it !moon!

Yup! Just the thing for the weirdo loner interrupting the school run!

And it has happened more than once, or is a .45 pistol better for taking out kids at close range? :rubchin:
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 03:06 PM


But seriously, would you say the same thing to people who blame all their woes on immigration and the EU?
Nail-head-hammer.

I'm off to enjoy a bent banana whilst power hovering under an incandescent light bulb.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
"How the swamp draining and taking on the wall Street elites going Donald?"

"Great! I've just signed some new legislation."

"Gee Donald thanks! We'll never have to worry about out of control bankers dumping toxic financial products onto the global markets again."

"Yup! I'm going to stop the annual stress tests and do away with the need to hold capital reserves that cover initial losses and I'll also make it harder to prosecute financial crooks, many of who are my new best friends."

"Um........."

"Sad! Unpatriotic! Loser!"


You bunch of American fuckwits! ;D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
How is he going to tell his voters that if he really takes on Mexico and Canada then the lights go off as the USA imports a mere 66 thousand gigawatt hours net electricity a year

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_02_13.html

Awkward
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 07:54 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 05:01 PM
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 04:13 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Besides which, freedom of speech means having the right to be offensive and insulting. If you don't like it don't listen.

That's a bit rich coming from you lefties.Pity you don't practice what you preach on a daily basis
I'm not a leftie, I've never believed in partisan politics and recent events have only strengthened this belief.

I see the right already beginning to repeat the same mistakes the left made, drunk on power, putting ideology before country, cracking down on dissent and dismissing anyone who disagrees as anti-democratic or "liberal elite" just as the keft used terms like "racist" for the same reason. Just watch as the so called liberal elite grows when the economic miracles promised by Trump and Brexiters fail to materialise.

Then watch in a few years when the left climb back on top and do the exact same thing. The words might change but it's the same old song.

You like to make out your not on the LEFT.But you are as left as Ctoo and Papa.As for the right cracking down on dissent.ARE YOU HAVING A LAUGH,you wouldn't think so after last nights performance at UC Berkely.

The police stood idly by and watched them attack people and damage property.Trump was right,any university that does not allow people with opposing views to speak may well have their federal funding stopped.

Watch them all scramble now, let the blame game begin.

Besides, the people will not put up with this shit much longer.If the government won't do nothing,the people will.

Only a fool would take the "RIGHTS" silence as a weakness.

If they start to demonstrate,all bets are off. REMEMBER they got all the guns,and not afraid to use them.

Imagine this scenario,a masked lunatic running at you with a weapon,you shoot them dead.No court in America would convict in that situation.That would be the first of many
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Steve K
Feb 3 2017, 09:31 PM
How is he going to tell his voters that if he really takes on Mexico and Canada then the lights go off as the USA imports a mere 66 thousand gigawatt hours net electricity a year

https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/html/epa_02_13.html

Awkward
IF,IF and more IF's. He has been in office 2 weeks for fooksake
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 09:31 PM


Imagine this scenario,a masked lunatic running at you with a weapon,you shoot them dead.No court in America would convict in that situation.That would be the first of many
You'd get the chair if you were black! ;D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rich
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
C-too
Feb 3 2017, 06:53 PM
Rich
Feb 3 2017, 04:55 PM
Happy Hornet
Feb 3 2017, 08:49 AM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep
Yes, and Jeremy Corbyn is testament to that......oh wait, was that a 3 line whip, you say? ;-)
You can't impose a three line whip on public opinion. ;-)
But you can obviously be a hypocritical Labour party leader.....oh, so that is ok then.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Steve K
Member Avatar
Once and future cynic
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 09:31 PM
You like to make out your not on the LEFT.But you are as left as Ctoo and Papa.As for the right cracking down on dissent.ARE YOU HAVING A LAUGH,you wouldn't think so after last nights performance at UC Berkely.

The police stood idly by and watched them attack people and damage property. . . .
Well if we're talking about those events:

Violent protest is wrong, very wrong even if it is about an arrogant arse like Milo Yiannopoulos who had indicated he intended to use his speech for illegal purpose.

For that latter reason alone Berkeley was right to deny him the ability to speak.


But nothing justifies some wished for repeat of Ohio 1970
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 09:34 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 09:31 PM


Imagine this scenario,a masked lunatic running at you with a weapon,you shoot them dead.No court in America would convict in that situation.That would be the first of many
You'd get the chair if you were black! ;D
It's not as far out as you think.Just one more thing apparently these violent demonstrations are only being done in states where the gun is banned.Pity they don't do a few in concealed carry states don't ya think ?

Don't think they would be to eager to attack anyone then,do you ?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Steve K
Feb 3 2017, 09:52 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 09:31 PM
You like to make out your not on the LEFT.But you are as left as Ctoo and Papa.As for the right cracking down on dissent.ARE YOU HAVING A LAUGH,you wouldn't think so after last nights performance at UC Berkely.

The police stood idly by and watched them attack people and damage property. . . .
Well if we're talking about those events:

Violent protest is wrong, very wrong even if it is about an arrogant arse like Milo Yiannopoulos who had indicated he intended to use his speech for illegal purpose.

For that latter reason alone Berkeley was right to deny him the ability to speak.


But nothing justifies some wished for repeat of Ohio 1970
Yiannopolous has been doing the university circuit for sometime so they know him rather well.

He is not a political agitator.

He is not a Wacist

He is not a Nazi.

Because he gives it back to the snowflakes twice as hard,they don't like it.

Besides,even if he was a Nazi,Fascist,Racist the whole idea of a university is to listen to people and counter argue.These fookwit snowflakes have to go into the real world one day and work.They won't find they are protected by their safe spaces,or sets of Lego or Plasticine anymore.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 10:06 PM
It's not as far out as you think.Just one more thing apparently these violent demonstrations are only being done in states where the gun is banned.Pity they don't do a few in concealed carry states don't ya think ?

Don't think they would be to eager to attack anyone then,do you ?


Have you just made that up? :rubchin:

Tell me which states "the gun is banned"? :)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
papasmurf
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 09:31 PM
You like to make out your not on the LEFT.But you are as left as Ctoo and Papa.
I have never been a sympathiser of, member of, or proselytiser for any political party. That you think compassion is exclusively a left wing characteristic speaks volumes.
Online Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 09:34 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 09:31 PM


Imagine this scenario,a masked lunatic running at you with a weapon,you shoot them dead.No court in America would convict in that situation.That would be the first of many
You'd get the chair if you were black! ;D
Well,in that scenario it could be classed as malicious ;D
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
papasmurf
Feb 3 2017, 10:14 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 09:31 PM
You like to make out your not on the LEFT.But you are as left as Ctoo and Papa.
I have never been a sympathiser of, member of, or proselytiser for any political party. That you think compassion is exclusively a left wing characteristic speaks volumes.
!jk! !jk! Your to the left of Corbyn for fooksake
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 10:14 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 10:06 PM
It's not as far out as you think.Just one more thing apparently these violent demonstrations are only being done in states where the gun is banned.Pity they don't do a few in concealed carry states don't ya think ?

Don't think they would be to eager to attack anyone then,do you ?


Have you just made that up? :rubchin:

Tell me which states "the gun is banned"? :)
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island. I should have said open carry is banned.

Still,I bet the fookin pussies won't be attacking people so openly in the other states
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 10:22 PM
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island. I should have said open carry is banned.

Still,I bet the fookin pussies won't be attacking people so openly in the other states
Oh right, you're changing your wording now?

I think you'll find many of these states require you to get additional background checks before you can carry a handgun in public, you need a specific permit iirc, and why stop at a mere pistol? Rifles and shotguns are legal just about everywhere and the former is far more deadly in skilled hands.

Snipers on tall buildings to put off lefty demonstrators?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
xosg
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Tigger
Feb 3 2017, 10:32 PM
xosg
Feb 3 2017, 10:22 PM
California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York and Rhode Island. I should have said open carry is banned.

Still,I bet the fookin pussies won't be attacking people so openly in the other states
Oh right, you're changing your wording now?

I think you'll find many of these states require you to get additional background checks before you can carry a handgun in public, you need a specific permit iirc, and why stop at a mere pistol? Rifles and shotguns are legal just about everywhere and the former is far more deadly in skilled hands.

Snipers on tall buildings to put off lefty demonstrators?
you can open carry assault rifles in the US in some states also. I think regardless of background checks you are not allowed to open carry in those states,unless you are high profile of course
Edited by xosg, Feb 3 2017, 10:37 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · America · Next Topic »
Add Reply