Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Uk Debate Mk 2, the UK's liveliest political and social debate site.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
The whose fault was WW2 thread; split from ‘eight wing violence’
Topic Started: Feb 5 2018, 08:57 PM (887 Views)
Bliss
Member Avatar
Regular Member
[ *  *  * ]
Happy Hornet
Feb 5 2018, 08:51 PM
Stonefish
Feb 5 2018, 08:49 PM
Happy Hornet
Feb 5 2018, 02:41 PM

Quoting limited to 3 levels deep

That's right HH just like Hitler wasn't to blame for atarting WW2 ,it was the bastard soldiers whp pulled the triggers.
Hitler gave the orders to the soldiers.

Are you saying the EU ordered this man to pull the trigger?
It wasn't Hitler's fault our soldiers died in ww2.. It was Churchill's fault.. for sticking his beak in & caved into the Rothschilds pressure.

The E.U have no business here..

Don't be like Churchill. Blood will be upon you.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
Curious Cdn
Member Avatar
Frozen Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Rich
Feb 12 2018, 12:37 AM
Steve K
Feb 11 2018, 11:46 PM
My country is no shithole
Now that statement HAS to be a fact in view of the fact that so many are trying to get here and the EU is doing their level best to keep us in.
You mean, they are trying to reach your country coming from worse shitholes?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
Steve K
Feb 15 2018, 03:50 PM
Gnikkk
Feb 15 2018, 03:21 PM
I believe there was some element of Other countries helping themselves post WW1 that caused a backlash in Germany, well something certainly peed off the main protagonist.
Very much so.

Germany lost huge tracks of land at the end of WW1 especially to Poland and faced a quite ridiculous level of compensation payments to France that was also trying to extract revenge for it's 1870 humiliation by Germany. A further complication was Germany was not comprehensively defeated militarily with no occupation. This allowed a festering false belief in many Germans that they had not really lost the war (the certainly had) but had instead been betrayed by their then lords and masters and in Hitler's mind, Jews.

Luckily WW2 ended very differently with a clear defeat, total occupation, an immediate new enemy in Russia to focus on and, instead of penalties, Marshall Aid
That post has got a bit of a brexity feel to it for some reason.

;-)
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
gee4444
Member Avatar
Regular Member
[ *  *  * ]
Interesting topic.

For those who believe all the historical propoganda (Hitler bad, Allies good) should consider the role of the banksters in Hitler's war industry. Read up on I.G Farben (mainly funded by Kuhn, Loeb & company (a predominantly Jewish firm), Rockerfeller, Dillon Read, JP Morgan - you know, the usual Wall Street scum bags.

Interesting read: https://www.bastabalkana.com/2013/07/wall-street-and-the-rise-of-hitler-the-history-of-banks-who-funded-nazis/

I.G Farben factories were deliberately not targeted during allied bombing raids upon instructions from US War dept - a war dept liberally staffed with men who previously worked for the firms previously mentioned. Other allied industries coooperated with the Nazis purely for financial gain - money comes first again.

WW2 was enabled only by allowing the funding to flow to Hitler's Germany. Without it no military buildup or industrial complex required to support it would be possible. My point is, and this has been argued by many (but not regularly discussed in MSM for obvious reasons) that the banksters make money out of wars and continue to do so to this day. UK's alliances were well understood and UK had no choice but to declare war after Poland was invaded. Similar scenario as WW1. Bankster's were aware of these agreements.

Once WW2 was finished with banksters moved funding to Russia - the next big enemy to be financed. When that finished it was off to the Middle East, now it's China and maybe Russia again too. Always some big bad enemy out there we need to maintain our military might against - funded by the tax payer of course and unlimited bankster fiat loans. If it wasn't so devastating it would be laughable that they continually get away with duping the masses.

That being said - I too would have fought against Hitler to defend what little humanity exists in this world and am forever greatful to those who gave or risked their lives doing so. Hitler's world would have been unbearable. My point is far worse than Hitler exists (however hard to believe that might seem) in the shadows pulling the strings of power. Hitler was just another pawn used in their game.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Tigger
Senior Member
[ *  *  *  * ]
gee4444
Feb 16 2018, 04:58 PM
Interesting topic.

For those who believe all the historical propoganda (Hitler bad, Allies good) should consider the role of the banksters in Hitler's war industry. Read up on I.G Farben (mainly funded by Kuhn, Loeb & company (a predominantly Jewish firm), Rockerfeller, Dillon Read, JP Morgan - you know, the usual Wall Street scum bags.

Interesting read: https://www.bastabalkana.com/2013/07/wall-street-and-the-rise-of-hitler-the-history-of-banks-who-funded-nazis/

I.G Farben factories were deliberately not targeted during allied bombing raids upon instructions from US War dept - a war dept liberally staffed with men who previously worked for the firms previously mentioned. Other allied industries coooperated with the Nazis purely for financial gain - money comes first again.

WW2 was enabled only by allowing the funding to flow to Hitler's Germany. Without it no military buildup or industrial complex required to support it would be possible. My point is, and this has been argued by many (but not regularly discussed in MSM for obvious reasons) that the banksters make money out of wars and continue to do so to this day. UK's alliances were well understood and UK had no choice but to declare war after Poland was invaded. Similar scenario as WW1. Bankster's were aware of these agreements.

Once WW2 was finished with banksters moved funding to Russia - the next big enemy to be financed. When that finished it was off to the Middle East, now it's China and maybe Russia again too. Always some big bad enemy out there we need to maintain our military might against - funded by the tax payer of course and unlimited bankster fiat loans. If it wasn't so devastating it would be laughable that they continually get away with duping the masses.

That being said - I too would have fought against Hitler to defend what little humanity exists in this world and am forever greatful to those who gave or risked their lives doing so. Hitler's world would have been unbearable. My point is far worse than Hitler exists (however hard to believe that might seem) in the shadows pulling the strings of power. Hitler was just another pawn used in their game.
I remember reading several years ago about the conduct of certain members of the Bank of England during WW2, the claim was that these people were dealing with senior figures in the Nazi regime via Switzerland and were essentially hedging their bets, this co operation continued until mid 1943 by which time it had become clear who was going to win, several other collaborators went to the gallows for far less serious offences than this outright undermining of the war effort.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
« Previous Topic · Europe · Next Topic »
Add Reply