Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
If you can't access your old account but want to post, post as a guest. The permissions have been altered so guests can post.

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
#5 New York Giants @ #2 Green Bay Packers
Topic Started: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:31 pm (873 Views)
Mariners in 2009
Member Avatar


Kavorka
Jan 16 2008, 09:16 PM
Anyone know if it's supposed to snow?

http://www.weather.com/weather/weekend/USW...pnav_undeclared
Quote Post Goto Top
 
jrmycmpfan
Member Avatar
Keep cool my babies

CHILL
Jan 16 2008, 09:13 PM
Kavorka
Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl.

Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here.

So, who you got?

Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:  :lol:

Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing.

The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... :thumbsup:

NY Giants 41 Packers 3

I hope you are joking. Right? :huh:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
CinciFan985
Member Avatar
Reds 45-57

jrmycmpfan
Jan 16 2008, 09:41 PM
CHILL
Jan 16 2008, 09:13 PM
Kavorka
Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl.

Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here.

So, who you got?

Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:  :lol:

Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing.

The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... :thumbsup:

NY Giants 41 Packers 3

I hope you are joking. Right? :huh:

he's a Bears fan so probably not.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
jrmycmpfan
Member Avatar
Keep cool my babies

BengalsFan985
Jan 16 2008, 09:44 PM
jrmycmpfan
Jan 16 2008, 09:41 PM
CHILL
Jan 16 2008, 09:13 PM
Kavorka
Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl.

Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here.

So, who you got?

Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:  :lol:

Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing.

The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... :thumbsup:

NY Giants 41 Packers 3

I hope you are joking. Right? :huh:

he's a Bears fan so probably not.

I think that might be the most biased comment I have ever seen if he is serious.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
CELTS20
Member Avatar
Mission 17: Complete

CHILL
Jan 17 2008, 12:13 AM
Kavorka
Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl.

Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here.

So, who you got?

Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:  :lol:

Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing.

The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... :thumbsup:

NY Giants 41 Packers 3

:unsure:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
yankee242B
Member Avatar
I'm a lead farmer, motherf...

CHILL
Jan 17 2008, 12:13 AM
Kavorka
Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl.

Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here.

So, who you got?

Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:  :lol:

Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing.

The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... :thumbsup:

NY Giants 41 Packers 3

You're going off two games, one of which was like five years ago?

Favre has a 43-5 record at home when the temperature is below 34 degrees. That's hardly a "misconception." It's basically a fact.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/n...tory?id=3199028

Big surprise here, but I'm taking the Packers in a walk: 37-17.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
JoeCoolMan24
Member Avatar
I got Alicia Sacramone

yankee242B
Jan 17 2008, 06:15 PM
CHILL
Jan 17 2008, 12:13 AM
Kavorka
Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl.

Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here.

So, who you got?

Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:  :lol:

Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing.

The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... :thumbsup:

NY Giants 41 Packers 3

You're going off two games, one of which was like five years ago?

Favre has a 43-5 record at home when the temperature is below 34 degrees. That's hardly a "misconception." It's basically a fact.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/n...tory?id=3199028

Big surprise here, but I'm taking the Packers in a walk: 37-17.

2004 was actually 3 years ago, 4 if he meant the year, not the season.

And the Bears game in which the Packers got slaughtered was like a month ago when it was sub-zero.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Prime Time
Member Avatar
Rock God, God of Rock, Tom Petty

So because the Pack lost one game in sub-zero temperature this season there screwed? Lets just look over the game where it was snowing and they came back from 14 points to win while we're at it.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
yankee242B
Member Avatar
I'm a lead farmer, motherf...

The point is that it is a very small sample, especially when half of it was not that recent.

Considering that the much, much larger sample shows the exact opposite of his point, I think he's wrong in a factual sense.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
JoeCoolMan24
Member Avatar
I got Alicia Sacramone

Kavorka
Jan 17 2008, 06:50 PM
So because the Pack lost one game in sub-zero temperature this season there screwed? Lets just look over the game where it was snowing and they came back from 14 points to win while we're at it.

No, but it also means because of the weather, this is not like some sort of garuntee or even a huge advantage.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · United Sports · Next Topic »
Add Reply