|
#5 New York Giants @ #2 Green Bay Packers
|
|
Topic Started: Wed Jan 16, 2008 6:31 pm (873 Views)
|
|
Mariners in 2009
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:21 am
Post #21
|
- Posts:
- 4,278
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #2
- Joined:
- July 23, 2007
|
- Kavorka
- Jan 16 2008, 09:16 PM
Anyone know if it's supposed to snow?
http://www.weather.com/weather/weekend/USW...pnav_undeclared
|
|
|
| |
|
jrmycmpfan
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:41 am
Post #22
|
Keep cool my babies
- Posts:
- 5,443
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #57
- Joined:
- July 27, 2007
|
- CHILL
- Jan 16 2008, 09:13 PM
- Kavorka
- Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl. Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here. So, who you got? Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:
Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing. The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers...
NY Giants 41 Packers 3
I hope you are joking. Right?
|
|
|
| |
|
CinciFan985
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:44 am
Post #23
|
Reds 45-57
- Posts:
- 6,063
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #33
- Joined:
- July 23, 2007
|
- jrmycmpfan
- Jan 16 2008, 09:41 PM
- CHILL
- Jan 16 2008, 09:13 PM
- Kavorka
- Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl. Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here. So, who you got? Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:
Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing. The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers...
NY Giants 41 Packers 3
I hope you are joking. Right?
he's a Bears fan so probably not.
|
|
|
| |
|
jrmycmpfan
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 12:56 am
Post #24
|
Keep cool my babies
- Posts:
- 5,443
- Group:
- Admin
- Member
- #57
- Joined:
- July 27, 2007
|
- BengalsFan985
- Jan 16 2008, 09:44 PM
- jrmycmpfan
- Jan 16 2008, 09:41 PM
- CHILL
- Jan 16 2008, 09:13 PM
- Kavorka
- Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl. Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here. So, who you got? Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:
Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing. The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers...
NY Giants 41 Packers 3
I hope you are joking. Right?
he's a Bears fan so probably not.
I think that might be the most biased comment I have ever seen if he is serious.
|
|
|
| |
|
CELTS20
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 6:20 pm
Post #25
|
Mission 17: Complete
- Posts:
- 3,092
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #21
- Joined:
- July 23, 2007
|
- CHILL
- Jan 17 2008, 12:13 AM
- Kavorka
- Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl. Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here. So, who you got? Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:
Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing. The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... NY Giants 41 Packers 3
:unsure:
|
|
|
| |
|
yankee242B
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:15 pm
Post #26
|
I'm a lead farmer, motherf...
- Posts:
- 3,706
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #14
- Joined:
- July 23, 2007
|
- CHILL
- Jan 17 2008, 12:13 AM
- Kavorka
- Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl. Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here. So, who you got? Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:
Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing. The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... NY Giants 41 Packers 3
You're going off two games, one of which was like five years ago?
Favre has a 43-5 record at home when the temperature is below 34 degrees. That's hardly a "misconception." It's basically a fact.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/n...tory?id=3199028
Big surprise here, but I'm taking the Packers in a walk: 37-17.
|
|
|
| |
|
JoeCoolMan24
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:47 pm
Post #27
|
I got Alicia Sacramone
- Posts:
- 5,520
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- July 23, 2007
|
- yankee242B
- Jan 17 2008, 06:15 PM
- CHILL
- Jan 17 2008, 12:13 AM
- Kavorka
- Jan 16 2008, 05:31 PM
After the exciting NFC divisional round games these two teams came out on top and are fighting for a chance to represent their conference in the Superbowl. Rumors say it's supposed to be below zero degrees in Green Bay this weekend. Huge advantage for the Pack here. So, who you got? Surprisingly, I'll take the Pack in this game. 38-20. Who woulda thunk it? :mellow:
Big misconception that near 0 degrees favors a Brett Favre team. Like the aforementioned and very similar Bears game, Favre also lost to Michael Vick in the Falcons in near identical weather deep in the playoffs back in 2004. I just don't conceive it to be highly beneficial to him anymore at this point in his career especially with the team they're facing. The New York Giants are the superior team in every way. In fact, the Packers are worse than the 49ers... NY Giants 41 Packers 3
You're going off two games, one of which was like five years ago? Favre has a 43-5 record at home when the temperature is below 34 degrees. That's hardly a "misconception." It's basically a fact. http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/n...tory?id=3199028Big surprise here, but I'm taking the Packers in a walk: 37-17.
2004 was actually 3 years ago, 4 if he meant the year, not the season.
And the Bears game in which the Packers got slaughtered was like a month ago when it was sub-zero.
|
|
|
| |
|
Prime Time
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:50 pm
Post #28
|
Rock God, God of Rock, Tom Petty
- Posts:
- 69
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #10
- Joined:
- July 23, 2007
|
So because the Pack lost one game in sub-zero temperature this season there screwed? Lets just look over the game where it was snowing and they came back from 14 points to win while we're at it.
|
|
|
| |
|
yankee242B
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 7:52 pm
Post #29
|
I'm a lead farmer, motherf...
- Posts:
- 3,706
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #14
- Joined:
- July 23, 2007
|
The point is that it is a very small sample, especially when half of it was not that recent.
Considering that the much, much larger sample shows the exact opposite of his point, I think he's wrong in a factual sense.
|
|
|
| |
|
JoeCoolMan24
|
Thu Jan 17, 2008 8:10 pm
Post #30
|
I got Alicia Sacramone
- Posts:
- 5,520
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- July 23, 2007
|
- Kavorka
- Jan 17 2008, 06:50 PM
So because the Pack lost one game in sub-zero temperature this season there screwed? Lets just look over the game where it was snowing and they came back from 14 points to win while we're at it.
No, but it also means because of the weather, this is not like some sort of garuntee or even a huge advantage.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|