Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
If you can't access your old account but want to post, post as a guest. The permissions have been altered so guests can post.

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Red Sox/Athletics in Japan
Topic Started: Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:27 pm (1,152 Views)
sportslover
Member Avatar


would you believe
Mar 29 2008, 01:25 AM
The revenue part doesn't make it fair at all. It's the fact both team don't each lose 1 game at their own home ballpark in front of all their fans, in their own locker rooms, etc.

It's a neutral site game for both, there's absolutely no justification as to why one team loses two and the other doesn't even lose one. If you think it is fair, then you're an idiot.

The Red Sox would never agree to do it if they were to lose a home game. Seems obvious enough. It might not be fair, but since when the fuck are sports fair? Go complain somewhere else.

:huh:

Quote Post Goto Top
 
JoeCoolMan24
Member Avatar
I got Alicia Sacramone

SL
 
And it's definitely not cool to be called an idiot..from a guy who thinks certain players experience a gain in production because they hit in front of a certain hitter.


........uhhh..

:huh:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
yankee242B
Member Avatar
I'm a lead farmer, motherf...

I think it's just plain stupid to have any games overseas. At least, games that count.

The NFL shouldn't do it and neither should MLB.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mariners in 2009
Member Avatar


yankee242B
Mar 28 2008, 11:50 PM
I think it's just plain stupid to have any games overseas.  At least, games that count.

Agreed. Then, on top of that they have to start a week early?

Japan has their own baseball league, fuck em.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
CHILL


sportslover
Mar 28 2008, 11:33 PM
would you believe
Mar 29 2008, 01:25 AM
The revenue part doesn't make it fair at all. It's the fact both team don't each lose 1 game at their own home ballpark in front of all their fans, in their own locker rooms, etc.

It's a neutral site game for both, there's absolutely no justification as to why one team loses two and the other doesn't even lose one. If you think it is fair, then you're an idiot.

The Red Sox would never agree to do it if they were to lose a home game. Seems obvious enough. It might not be fair, but since when the fuck are sports fair? Go complain somewhere else.

:huh:

Then you don't put the Red Sox in the game. Seems pretty obvious and not so complicated, Sherlock. Go bitch somewhere else with your nonsensical arguments.

:mellow:
Quote Post Goto Top
 
sportslover
Member Avatar


would you believe
Mar 29 2008, 10:08 PM
sportslover
Mar 28 2008, 11:33 PM
would you believe
Mar 29 2008, 01:25 AM
The revenue part doesn't make it fair at all. It's the fact both team don't each lose 1 game at their own home ballpark in front of all their fans, in their own locker rooms, etc.

It's a neutral site game for both, there's absolutely no justification as to why one team loses two and the other doesn't even lose one. If you think it is fair, then you're an idiot.

The Red Sox would never agree to do it if they were to lose a home game. Seems obvious enough. It might not be fair, but since when the fuck are sports fair? Go complain somewhere else.

:huh:

Then you don't put the Red Sox in the game. Seems pretty obvious and not so complicated, Sherlock. Go bitch somewhere else with your nonsensical arguments.

:mellow:

Right. Why would they want to do the most marketable team in Japan with Dice-K and the other Asian guy whose name just escaped my mind?

THE A'S AGREED TO IT?!!! Where they supposed to turn their ass on it because it's not "fair"?

Please, like the majors, the same league where there's like a $200 million gap between the biggest and smallest payrolls in the league, is fair.
Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
« Previous Topic · United Sports · Next Topic »
Add Reply