| DNA suggestions; Yay! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 27 2012, 01:36 PM (967 Views) | |
| Superdude327 | Sep 27 2012, 01:36 PM Post #1 |
![]()
What the shell.
|
1. Argyrolagus 2. Nanotyrannus 3. Giant Junglefowl (Basically just a three-foot-tall chicken.) 4. Humboldicthys (A pre-historic electric fish!) 5. Anqingosaurus 6. Keuppia 7. Andrewsarchus And that's it for now. |
: 1,000DNA Xenosaurs Adoptables
| |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| DinoFlame | Sep 27 2012, 08:03 PM Post #11 |
![]()
Would you like a jelly baby?
|
This is only my own guess... but I'd be guessing the answer is no. |
: 200DNA Xenosaurs Ideas for Future Xenosaurs Win-Lose Ratio
| |
![]() |
|
| Flishstar | Sep 27 2012, 08:22 PM Post #12 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Nanotyrannus is a valid genus now, actually. They did a study on its braincase. |
![]() : 500DNA Xenosaurs
| |
![]() |
|
| Clocky | Sep 27 2012, 08:27 PM Post #13 |
![]()
Eusthenopteron
|
Personally I don't see a reason to say no to any DNA, so long as it's extinct. I mean, the more the merrier, right? |
0 ![]() Xenosaurs: Shivapithecus, Xenosaur Concepts DNA Important
| |
![]() |
|
| DinoFlame | Sep 27 2012, 08:31 PM Post #14 |
![]()
Would you like a jelly baby?
|
To an extent, I have to agree with this. When it comes right down to it, so long as they're different enough in appearance, or lacking that, are different enough in stats to what they're similar to, there should eventually be room for a lot of stuff in time. |
: 200DNA Xenosaurs Ideas for Future Xenosaurs Win-Lose Ratio
| |
![]() |
|
| Flishstar | Sep 27 2012, 08:52 PM Post #15 |
![]()
Administrator
|
If you give too many choices that are too similar, people will not know what to pick, and, likewise, will be more likely get frustrated and leave. This reminds of the time MLS wanted to add a Carcharadontosaurus even though we already had a Giga. |
![]() : 500DNA Xenosaurs
| |
![]() |
|
| Clocky | Sep 27 2012, 09:03 PM Post #16 |
![]()
Eusthenopteron
|
Which seems like a fine idea to me. Carcharadontosaurus is a great dinosaur. ... Did I just agree with him? |
0 ![]() Xenosaurs: Shivapithecus, Xenosaur Concepts DNA Important
| |
![]() |
|
| DinoFlame | Sep 27 2012, 09:06 PM Post #17 |
![]()
Would you like a jelly baby?
|
I agree, but that's where the differences in stats come in. Perhaps Giga has higher Health or Attack, but Carchar has more balanced/even stats. Because of that difference, even though they are similar, if you mix each of them with, say, Ankylosaurus, you'll have two different sets of stats. |
: 200DNA Xenosaurs Ideas for Future Xenosaurs Win-Lose Ratio
| |
![]() |
|
| Flishstar | Sep 27 2012, 09:06 PM Post #18 |
![]()
Administrator
|
Except it is nearly identical to Giganotosaurus, not only in appearance, but size and strength. EDIT: that was aimed at Clocky, not you, DF.
Edited by Flishstar, Sep 27 2012, 09:07 PM.
|
![]() : 500DNA Xenosaurs
| |
![]() |
|
| Clocky | Sep 27 2012, 09:09 PM Post #19 |
![]()
Eusthenopteron
|
So? Give it different stats. They clearly aren't reliant on actual physical properties; Amphy has less HP than Magnapaulia. Put Carchar in the 5000 group is you must.
|
0 ![]() Xenosaurs: Shivapithecus, Xenosaur Concepts DNA Important
| |
![]() |
|
| DinoFlame | Sep 27 2012, 09:12 PM Post #20 |
![]()
Would you like a jelly baby?
|
I sort of just said that already.
|
: 200DNA Xenosaurs Ideas for Future Xenosaurs Win-Lose Ratio
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DNA Suggestions · Next Topic » |



: 1,000









8:36 PM Jul 10