| DNA suggestions; Yay! | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Sep 27 2012, 01:36 PM (966 Views) | |
| Superdude327 | Sep 27 2012, 01:36 PM Post #1 |
![]()
What the shell.
|
1. Argyrolagus 2. Nanotyrannus 3. Giant Junglefowl (Basically just a three-foot-tall chicken.) 4. Humboldicthys (A pre-historic electric fish!) 5. Anqingosaurus 6. Keuppia 7. Andrewsarchus And that's it for now. |
: 1,000DNA Xenosaurs Adoptables
| |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Clocky | Sep 27 2012, 09:13 PM Post #21 |
![]()
Eusthenopteron
|
I know, but considering how he specified how identical the two are, I figured I'd point out the HP descrepency(sp?). |
0 ![]() Xenosaurs: Shivapithecus, Xenosaur Concepts DNA Important
| |
![]() |
|
| DinoFlame | Sep 27 2012, 09:15 PM Post #22 |
![]()
Would you like a jelly baby?
|
Fair enough. I had been wondering about that a bit too, admittedly. |
: 200DNA Xenosaurs Ideas for Future Xenosaurs Win-Lose Ratio
| |
![]() |
|
| Clocky | Sep 27 2012, 09:19 PM Post #23 |
![]()
Eusthenopteron
|
It's been haunting my nightmares
|
0 ![]() Xenosaurs: Shivapithecus, Xenosaur Concepts DNA Important
| |
![]() |
|
| Blitzfish | Sep 28 2012, 03:55 AM Post #24 |
![]()
They call me El Pendejo.
|
Wait... Nanotyrannus is valid? How do I miss this stuff?! Also, now that I think about it, I agree for the most part with what people are saying. I also think Nanotyrannus would be OK to have... but I don't know how to change my poll choice, so...
|
Xenosaurs
| |
![]() |
|
| Superdude327 | Sep 28 2012, 08:26 AM Post #25 |
![]()
What the shell.
|
Perhaps with a higher speed than Yu-t, to make it different? Or perhaps give it Traction.
Edited by Superdude327, Sep 28 2012, 08:29 AM.
|
: 1,000DNA Xenosaurs Adoptables
| |
![]() |
|
| Blitzfish | Sep 28 2012, 02:08 PM Post #26 |
![]()
They call me El Pendejo.
|
Yeah, we could lower HP and Attack, raise Speed and Def., and swap out Rampage for Traction. |
Xenosaurs
| |
![]() |
|
| Superdude327 | Sep 28 2012, 05:07 PM Post #27 |
![]()
What the shell.
|
I noticed there was no Baryonyx, so suggested. |
: 1,000DNA Xenosaurs Adoptables
| |
![]() |
|
| Flishstar | Sep 29 2012, 11:55 AM Post #28 |
![]()
Administrator
|
There was originally a baryonyx, but I got rid of it because it would have all the same stats as Spino, just without a sail, just smaller packaged.
Edited by Flishstar, Sep 29 2012, 11:55 AM.
|
![]() : 500DNA Xenosaurs
| |
![]() |
|
| DinoFlame | Sep 29 2012, 12:03 PM Post #29 |
![]()
Would you like a jelly baby?
|
By that logic, we should only have Quetzalcoatlus and no other pterosaurs, though... Again, the whole "stats can be different" discussion above. |
: 200DNA Xenosaurs Ideas for Future Xenosaurs Win-Lose Ratio
| |
![]() |
|
| Flishstar | Sep 29 2012, 12:06 PM Post #30 |
![]()
Administrator
|
No, Quetz is the only adzarchid. all the other ones aren't closely related, save sordes and ramphy, but Blitz and Alby really wanted sordes for whatever reason. XD
|
![]() : 500DNA Xenosaurs
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · DNA Suggestions · Next Topic » |



: 1,000








How do I miss this stuff?! Also, now that I think about it, I agree for the most part with what people are saying. I also think Nanotyrannus would be OK to have... but I don't know how to change my poll choice, so...


all the other ones aren't closely related, save sordes and ramphy, but Blitz and Alby really wanted sordes for whatever reason. XD
8:36 PM Jul 10