| Welcome to Zatalounge Zatalounge is a chat forum provided for those who wish to present their personal views, opinions, or insights on all sorts of topics. Everyone has an opinion and they don't always agree. This website seeks to promote differences of opinion and discussions among users so that everyone gets to have their say. Become a registered member or be our guest. It's your choice! |
| The bomber have a right to privacy? On the taxpayers dime? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 25 2013, 08:17 PM (108 Views) | |
| Guest | Apr 25 2013, 08:17 PM Post #1 |
|
Unregistered
|
The Patrick administration clamped down the lid yesterday on Herald requests for details of Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s government benefits, citing the dead terror mastermind’s right to privacy. Across the board, state agencies flatly refused to provide information about the taxpayer-funded lifestyle for the 26-year-old man and his brother and accused accomplice Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, 19. On EBT card status or spending, state welfare spokesman Alec Loftus would only say Tamerlan Tsarnaev, his wife and 3-year-old daughter received benefits that ended in 2012. He declined further comment. On unemployment compensation, labor department spokesman Kevin Franck refused to say whether Tamerlan Tsarnaev ever collected, saying it was “confidential and not a matter of public record.” On Dzhokhar Tsarnaev’s college aid, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth spokesman Robert Connolly said, “It is our position — and I believe the accepted position in higher education — that student records including academic records and financial records (including financial aid) cannot under federal law be released without a student’s consent.” On cellphones, the Federal Communications Commission would not say whether either brother had a government-paid cellphone, also citing privacy laws. On housing, Cambridge officials and the family’s landlord ducked questions on whether the brothers were ever on Section 8 assistance. The Herald reported yesterday that Tamerlan Tsarnaev, his wife and 3-year-old daughter collected welfare until 2012 and that both Tamerlan and Dzhokhar received benefits through their parents “for a limited portion” of the time after they came to the U.S., which was around 2002. However, the Department of Transitional Assistance wouldn’t release information about how long or how much they received. It remains unclear how the accused bomber brothers financed their heartless attacks on the marathon. The administration was slammed by a Democratic congressman who insisted the public has a right to know how taxpayers were underwriting the accused jihadist Tsarnaevs. “It’s certainly relevant information that should be made public,” U.S. Rep. Stephen F. Lynch told the Herald. “There’s a national security interest No. 1. Secondly, there’s also a public interest in finding out whether these individuals were able to exploit the system and get benefits they weren’t entitled to.” Dzhokhar Tsarnaev lies hospitalized and facing capital charges that include using a weapon of mass destruction that killed three people and injured 260 near the Boston Marathon finish line. Taxpayers — already on the hook for Tsarnaev’s court-appointed attorneys in the terror plot — continue to pay his mounting medical bills at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The public also paid for Tamerlan Tsarnaev’s attorney when the Russian national successfully fought criminal charges in 2009 that he battered a former girlfriend. |
|
|
| Tybee | Apr 25 2013, 08:42 PM Post #2 |
|
We must remember, "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law". |
![]() |
|
| Guest | Apr 25 2013, 08:55 PM Post #3 |
|
Unregistered
|
I love how some nuts think the Constitution and laws only apply unless the mob really doesn't like you. |
|
|
| Guest | Apr 25 2013, 09:11 PM Post #4 |
|
Unregistered
|
Gosh, it's all so confusing. What do the people at Stormfront think about it, OP? |
|
|
| Guest | Apr 25 2013, 09:42 PM Post #5 |
|
Unregistered
|
I think we should just let random citizens decide who gets rights and who doesn't. Especially indignant, uninformed random citizens. |
|
|
| Guest | Apr 26 2013, 01:13 AM Post #6 |
|
Unregistered
|
if you're gonna copy sentences from the Republican platform you should cite the xsource |
|
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |







3:58 AM Jul 11