| I am a bit torn between CM and FUT | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Oct 13 2014, 02:05 AM (24 Views) | |
| meng123159 | Oct 13 2014, 02:05 AM Post #1 |
|
Overall, a reasonably good review, but I do think you mistake superficial additions for really depth. Right this moment I am a bit torn between CM and FUT single-player seasons (a fantastic addition!). CM traditionally have been my game mode of choice but FUT a minimum of satisfies my itch to tinker with my squad - I'm always seeking out new players to try out to see as long as they improve my squad from match to enhance. Between opening packs, looking new kits, or searching for players I've never discovered within the transfer market, FUT at the least gives me things you can do in-between matches. These tasks might not be "realistic" nevertheless they get me involved, develop a relationship, to make me feel invested. CM still doesn't try this. At the end during the day, CM unfortunately doesn't do enough to generate me feel like I'm managing, may it be building a club, squad, or player. Undoubtedly it's think about it a lot from what it really was 36 months ago, but I think a much better balance is required between adding breadth and superficial additions, and adding the nuts and bolts varieties of features that basically have you feeling like you're managing something. "The gamer negotiations feel more fleshed out too and i also’m a major fan from the Player Role options i always’ve helpful to get some decent players solely from the promise of varsity football" Do you mind expanding about this? I hadn't thought this program really made a positive change. And can't you simply promise everyone first team football after which do whatever you need using them once they've joined? What are the repercussions for lying? "So using these new managerial paths to get rid of Europe as well as the International scene it’s a shame that one of the best Career Mode options has dropped off, a chance to add your Virtual Pro towards team you’re managing. EA will certainly reason that, that’s the Player component of the game is designed for, but I enjoyed developing my VP whilst having complete control above the clubs interests in order that it’s a genuine shame to reduce it, seemingly unnecessarily." Yeah, this is a MASSIVE disappointment. EA have this terrible tendency of removing issues that I love from MM/CM without replacing all of them with anything else. First it turned out manual player growth, now the VPs. Both were imperfect features they were features nonetheless that included in the knowledge for many people people without hurting the expertise of people who didn't want to rely on them. And you know, people may conisder that "that maybe what the participant component www.fifa4buy.com the action is for" or "it's more realistic now" however you understand what? Even though choosing you option of CM, you've kept the possibility to regulate your entire team in matches if you want, so isn't that kinda contradictory? I dislike it whenever they make decisions strictly in the name of realism and seemingly without things to consider for what's actually fun. Especially when we're talking about OPTIONAL features - just like manual player growth, there is a constant were required to play with your VP if you didn't would like to. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic » |






2:47 PM Jul 11