Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


Welcome to Blue and Yellow Hoodoo. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Official Trade Week / Draft Topic
Topic Started: Oct 1 2011, 09:48 AM (3,761 Views)
Nick
Member Avatar

In all honesty I can't see us getting any higher than Port's second pick (28), straight swap. It's a shame Port didn't finish higher, preferably just outside the top 8 then they would have had pick 15ish we probably could have used that against Ebert. Pick 30 for him is about right, he is probably worth early to mid-20's but seen as though that pick isn't in play we'll just have to settle for 28.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Karlieee
Member Avatar
BITCH dunt b getting mouthy with me
clark?/? the guy wif the tats is ugly omg
:)
LOVEEEEEEEEEEEE LIFEEE!
Posted Image
Matthew Rosa #1
Rowingggggggg<3
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JustinGT
Member Avatar

It isn't in Adelaide's best interest to strengthen our squad. If they are any bit rational they will choose weakening our squad whislt making Port Adelaide's stronger. Port are far less likely to be any sort of realistic flag threat in the future.

Mind you obviously there is a chance that Port will end up stronger than us in the short-medium term, after our older guys have all parted ways.
Big Al
 

i did use to run my own "AFL", id play 9 games a week til i was 16 ay....quarters would be until i needed a drink...id right all the match ups, commentate for myself clap trees after i kicked goals as if i did something right, had 2 fake teams Hobart and Subiaco drawn up...Hobarts players came from a bunch of locations and shit like warik, karinyup, gvelup, there chris judd version was adam rees who won 3 brownlows (ye i did my own brownow night on spreadsheets and shit lol), subis was andy simmonds who i got the name off when he was still playing cricket ay

as i got older had to do it in the night cos i didnt want niggers seing me do it, felt like a dumb cunt when people saw me talking to myself or commentating


Junior's secret ^
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Maddison
Member Avatar

How about Eagles lose Ebert, Lycett, Lynch and then one of Swift or Masten, picks 6/23/45

And we gain O'Meara, Clark and Pick 28

Doesn't seem even for us overall, 6 + Lynch for O'meara is a lot to pay, or is it?
Drawingssssssssss
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JustinGT
Member Avatar

Maddison
Oct 6 2011, 04:21 PM
How about Eagles lose Ebert, Lycett, Lynch and then one of Swift or Masten, picks 6/23/45

And we gain O'Meara, Clark and Pick 28

Doesn't seem even for us overall, 6 + Lynch for O'meara is a lot to pay, or is it?
That would be like the worst case scenario for us, we're losing out BIG time on that and we won't be able to get O'Meara anyways.
Big Al
 

i did use to run my own "AFL", id play 9 games a week til i was 16 ay....quarters would be until i needed a drink...id right all the match ups, commentate for myself clap trees after i kicked goals as if i did something right, had 2 fake teams Hobart and Subiaco drawn up...Hobarts players came from a bunch of locations and shit like warik, karinyup, gvelup, there chris judd version was adam rees who won 3 brownlows (ye i did my own brownow night on spreadsheets and shit lol), subis was andy simmonds who i got the name off when he was still playing cricket ay

as i got older had to do it in the night cos i didnt want niggers seing me do it, felt like a dumb cunt when people saw me talking to myself or commentating


Junior's secret ^
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JackH
Member Avatar

Clark would be a terrible replacement for Lynch...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Maddison
Member Avatar

How ya figure that one? Elaborate....
Drawingssssssssss
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JackH
Member Avatar

Clark isn't a forward in the slightest and Lynch plays CHF.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Simmo

JackH
Oct 6 2011, 04:24 PM
Clark isn't a forward in the slightest and Lynch plays CHF.
Clark is a capable CHF. Subiaco is ideal for him, he needs space to run around in....He is Franklinesk
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Maddison
Member Avatar

Lets not start comparing Mitch Clark to Buddy Franklin lol.

Look at the positives on acquiring Mitch Clark. Dean Cox won't be around forever. It's a testament to Coxy that he's been able to sustain the elite form for so long. Glass is in the same boat. West Coast players traditionally don't play far beyond 30, let alone ruckman or talls. There is no guarantee Lynch won't revert back to his usual frustrating self either.

Clark can play CHF. He can easily float around CHF and play back up ruck when need be. He would provide relief to Naitanui and Lycett in a similar manner to Lynch backing up both Cox and Naitanui

Plus he would complete the most badass set of talls the comp has seen in a while. In the mean time we draft another KPD either McIness or Lockyer and we would never need to worry about our talls again.
Drawingssssssssss
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Free Forums with no limits on posts or members.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Our Team · Next Topic »
Add Reply

[President] [Vice President] [Director] [Treasurer] [Secretary] [Charter Head] [Krew] [Prospect] [Regular Visitor] [Visitor]