| Welcome to Catena. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. When registering, we ask that you register with your NS nation name as your username. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| International Preserved Areas Initiative; Possible draft of a WA proposal | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 2 2013, 03:03 AM (210 Views) | |
| Tehuacan | Jan 2 2013, 03:03 AM Post #1 |
|
¡Socialismo moderno para siempre!
|
Hello everyone, I've been rattling this around in my head and I decided to see what everyone here thinks. This is an extremely rough draft of a proposal I'm considering submitting as a WA resolution. Any input is appreciated, particularly concerning legality or duplication.
Edited by Tehuacan, Jan 16 2013, 05:47 PM.
|
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Slenisia | Jan 3 2013, 08:15 AM Post #2 |
|
I can't see any things that I would personally object to myself and I'd be entirely behind this initiative. Encouraging environmentally-friendly measures and establishing bureaucracy are both key purposes of the WA. However, some people could interpret this as being rather far-reaching with the whole telling how much they need to have and where it needs to be. Not everyone might get the entire point of the national borders thing, for instance. Personally, I found these parts the best parts, given that without them, it's loses its teeth as a piece of legislation and becomes merely a commendation of the benefits of parks and a statement of their importance. Not to worry though; anyone would do pretty much anything for awards. Besides, this makes more sense than most of the stuff they're passing these days anyways.
|
| ✫SLĖNISIA | |
![]() |
|
| Tehuacan | Jan 3 2013, 03:29 PM Post #3 |
|
¡Socialismo moderno para siempre!
|
This is very true....thanks for the input! I'm probably going to post this on the WA forum shortly and see how long it takes the people in the festering snakepit (aka the GA) to rip it to shreds. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Santuana | Jan 5 2013, 08:46 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Republic of Santuana
|
In any case Santosa would strongly support this motion. Protecting and preserving the environment has always be a central concern of successive Santosan governments with the current Communist one being no exception. Santosans view the land as an extension and part of the people, if the land dies so too do the people. The level of care and attention given to protecting and preserving the environment in Santosa has led to Santosa having one of the lushest and healthiest environments, right up there alongside Tehuacan. Just take a walk in one of our century old rainforests. You will see Jaguar, Santosan Tapir, a large array of snakes and constrictors, various parrots, several species of monkeys. It really is a diverse environment and that's only the rainforests, we have plenty more where that came from. |
![]() |
|
| Tehuacan | Jan 15 2013, 03:47 PM Post #5 |
|
¡Socialismo moderno para siempre!
|
Latest draft posted in the OP; revisions made after extensive discussion on other offsite forums and the WA forum. Comments are welcome; I may be submitting this soon. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| Pericion | Jan 15 2013, 04:52 PM Post #6 |
|
Republic of Pericion
|
I really like this. Pericion offers full support. |
![]() | |
![]() |
|
| Tehuacan | Jan 16 2013, 05:48 PM Post #7 |
|
¡Socialismo moderno para siempre!
|
I've posted what is most likely the final draft before submission; added a clause allowing the IPPA to dispense funds to recompensate people whose property is claimed for a preserved area, and made some minor edits for brevity. |
![]()
| |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Drafts and Proposals · Next Topic » |









8:27 AM Jul 11