| Welcome to Coltpower. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2
| Colts Haven't Retired #88 but they won't let Nicks wear it either | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 18 2014, 11:47 AM (636 Views) | |
Bent20
|
Apr 26 2014, 12:33 AM Post #31 |
|
Headed to Retirement
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
No one is addressing the obvious here. Only one Indy Colt has had their number retired - Peyton Manning! No debate about that is there? Here is the list of Baltimore Colts with retired numbers. Love them all you like old schoolers, but several of these guys, despite being Hall of Famers, don't deserve to have their number retired, in my humble opinion: N#PlayerPositionYears played 18Peyton ManningQB1998–2012 19Johnny UnitasQB1956–72 22Buddy YoungRB1953–55 24Lenny MooreHB1956–67 70Art DonovanDT1953–61 77Jim ParkerOL1957–67 82Raymond BerryWR1955–67 89Gino MarchettiDE1953–66 And I would add, if you're good with those numbers being retired, explain why 98, 93, 32, 88, 78 and 63 (at the very least) shouldn't be retired as well. Edited by Bent20, Apr 26 2014, 12:44 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| errsay | Apr 26 2014, 01:58 PM Post #32 |
|
Pro Bowl'er
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You have to ask Irsay that one... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · 12th Man · Next Topic » |
- Pages:
- 1
- 2


Bent20



8:47 PM Jul 10