Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
Kalou
Topic Started: Jan 31 2014, 01:39 PM (589 Views)
phatosas

We are already throwing blows and the deal didn't even happen. Imagine what would have happened if Arsenal sign Kalou on loan.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Member Avatar
JODB
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:47 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Jan 31 2014, 02:37 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:31 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Jan 31 2014, 02:29 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:19 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:09 PM
Ha! It must be the recycling of every rumour going back ten years. Still, I'm betting RVP would consider his chance of a return to us over if that happened. Wouldn't he Phato?
What do you have to say to Wenger, he wanted to get Kalou and he got rejected, embarrassing isn't it?
Embarrassing would be if Wenger overpaid for him. I would imagine that Arsene knows just about how much Kalou is worth and decided that if he was going to overpay, it wouldn't be for his quality.

What is embarrassing, though, is a professed total Gooner constantly pizzing on the club he supposedly supports.

FASLG!
Embarrassing is why Wenger is even interested in him at all. Keep pretending like you agree with the move to bring him in.
Not at all. Are you saying that Wenger doesn't have an eye for talent? I mean, that would be stupid.

You, on the other hand, are an embarrassment as a "supporter."
Only you knows what you mean by that
The connection between my highlighted sentence and your post prior to it should be quite clear.

Try leaning your head and banging on the top side to see if you can get that Wenger flavored Hatorade out of there as it appears to be impacting your ability to comprehend simple things.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:50 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:31 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Jan 31 2014, 02:29 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:19 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:09 PM
Ha! It must be the recycling of every rumour going back ten years. Still, I'm betting RVP would consider his chance of a return to us over if that happened. Wouldn't he Phato?
What do you have to say to Wenger, he wanted to get Kalou and he got rejected, embarrassing isn't it?
Embarrassing would be if Wenger overpaid for him. I would imagine that Arsene knows just about how much Kalou is worth and decided that if he was going to overpay, it wouldn't be for his quality.

What is embarrassing, though, is a professed total Gooner constantly pizzing on the club he supposedly supports.

FASLG!
Embarrassing is why Wenger is even interested in him at all. Keep pretending like you agree with the move to bring him in.
Now we must pass rumour off as fact: when it suits our agenda.

And when I say something: "prove it, prove it, prove it Santry"

;)
But you never do prove it though do you. In fact you post more unsubstantiated rumours on here than anybody, so it should be asked of you, when is a rumour to be given any credence ?

Answer. When is suits santry's particular argument de jour, & a Kalou move to Arsenal certainly wouldn't do that would it
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
santry_gooner
Member Avatar

billabog5
Jan 31 2014, 04:10 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:50 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:31 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Jan 31 2014, 02:29 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:19 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:09 PM
Ha! It must be the recycling of every rumour going back ten years. Still, I'm betting RVP would consider his chance of a return to us over if that happened. Wouldn't he Phato?
What do you have to say to Wenger, he wanted to get Kalou and he got rejected, embarrassing isn't it?
Embarrassing would be if Wenger overpaid for him. I would imagine that Arsene knows just about how much Kalou is worth and decided that if he was going to overpay, it wouldn't be for his quality.

What is embarrassing, though, is a professed total Gooner constantly pizzing on the club he supposedly supports.

FASLG!
Embarrassing is why Wenger is even interested in him at all. Keep pretending like you agree with the move to bring him in.
Now we must pass rumour off as fact: when it suits our agenda.

And when I say something: "prove it, prove it, prove it Santry"

;)
But you never do prove it though do you. In fact you post more unsubstantiated rumours on here than anybody, so it should be asked of you, when is a rumour to be given any credence ?

Answer. When is suits santry's particular argument de jour, & a Kalou move to Arsenal certainly wouldn't do that would it
I post unsubstantiated rumours?

Nice try. When we had the Higuain bid in the summer I posted what his father said. And guess what,.... It turned out there was a bid confirmed by Ancellotti...even though Piz lived in utter denial. When we entered into negotiations for Villa I posted that Graham Hunter saw the Arsenal entourage in Barca. When we went after Arteta I posted what a former Arsenal scout said to a journalist about tracking him for three years.. Though Piz has for whatever reason mocked that. Before we swooped for Podolski I posted what FC cologne officials were saying in the German newspapers.

I don't only rely on direct quotes. I discount what slimy agents say because the guff about 'watched by Arsenal' is free headline grabbing spin. But what I throw in there is either badged as a 'rumour' or I ask people if they think it's true if I'm not sure.

That's a bit better than unsubstantiated. Unlike your fictional spits by Arsenal players, or fouls committed by Arsenal defenders, or basically anything you have to say about our team..... Troll.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
supercollider7
Member Avatar

I don't believe we were interested in Kalou at all.
He's just one of the names that the tabloids love to link us with.

And while he could've been useful, I'd rather give those precious minutes to Gnabry or Ox.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dream_team
Member Avatar

supercollider7
Jan 31 2014, 05:02 PM
I don't believe we were interested in Kalou at all.
He's just one of the names that the tabloids love to link us with.

And while he could've been useful, I'd rather give those precious minutes to Gnabry or Ox.
why don't you believe it? Wenger has been interested in him in the past. and it would have been a loan move just like Kim K.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
supercollider7
Member Avatar

dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 05:06 PM
supercollider7
Jan 31 2014, 05:02 PM
I don't believe we were interested in Kalou at all.
He's just one of the names that the tabloids love to link us with.

And while he could've been useful, I'd rather give those precious minutes to Gnabry or Ox.
why don't you believe it? Wenger has been interested in him in the past. and it would have been a loan move just like Kim K.
Do we have any trusted sources reporting it?
I was following Jeremy Wilson's updates and he said there was no move for Kalou.

Kalou is one of those players that always gets linked to us and I've learned to ignore it.

He might've been a useful player but I don't think he'd have made more of an impact that Gnabry to be honest.
I'm glad we didn't sign him.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 04:33 PM
billabog5
Jan 31 2014, 04:10 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:50 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:31 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Jan 31 2014, 02:29 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:19 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:09 PM
Ha! It must be the recycling of every rumour going back ten years. Still, I'm betting RVP would consider his chance of a return to us over if that happened. Wouldn't he Phato?
What do you have to say to Wenger, he wanted to get Kalou and he got rejected, embarrassing isn't it?
Embarrassing would be if Wenger overpaid for him. I would imagine that Arsene knows just about how much Kalou is worth and decided that if he was going to overpay, it wouldn't be for his quality.

What is embarrassing, though, is a professed total Gooner constantly pizzing on the club he supposedly supports.

FASLG!
Embarrassing is why Wenger is even interested in him at all. Keep pretending like you agree with the move to bring him in.
Now we must pass rumour off as fact: when it suits our agenda.

And when I say something: "prove it, prove it, prove it Santry"

;)
But you never do prove it though do you. In fact you post more unsubstantiated rumours on here than anybody, so it should be asked of you, when is a rumour to be given any credence ?

Answer. When is suits santry's particular argument de jour, & a Kalou move to Arsenal certainly wouldn't do that would it
I post unsubstantiated rumours?

Nice try. When we had the Higuain bid in the summer I posted what his father said. And guess what,.... It turned out there was a bid confirmed by Ancellotti...even though Piz lived in utter denial. When we entered into negotiations for Villa I posted that Graham Hunter saw the Arsenal entourage in Barca. When we went after Arteta I posted what a former Arsenal scout said to a journalist about tracking him for three years.. Though Piz has for whatever reason mocked that. Before we swooped for Podolski I posted what FC cologne officials were saying in the German newspapers.

I don't only rely on direct quotes. I discount what slimy agents say because the guff about 'watched by Arsenal' is free headline grabbing spin. But what I throw in there is either badged as a 'rumour' or I ask people if they think it's true if I'm not sure.

That's a bit better than unsubstantiated. Unlike your fictional spits by Arsenal players, or fouls committed by Arsenal defenders, or basically anything you have to say about our team..... Troll.
Yes, you do post unsubstantiated rumours claiming them as your "reliable source" , one of these was a cheap London metro rag as I recall

Now, are you simply discounting Wengers past or current possible interest in Kalou because you doubt it has any substance or because given your constant harrassment of certain posters about him, you simply don't want to believe it ? Maybe both
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
santry_gooner
Member Avatar

billabog5
Jan 31 2014, 09:55 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 04:33 PM
billabog5
Jan 31 2014, 04:10 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:50 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:31 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Jan 31 2014, 02:29 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:19 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:09 PM
Ha! It must be the recycling of every rumour going back ten years. Still, I'm betting RVP would consider his chance of a return to us over if that happened. Wouldn't he Phato?
What do you have to say to Wenger, he wanted to get Kalou and he got rejected, embarrassing isn't it?
Embarrassing would be if Wenger overpaid for him. I would imagine that Arsene knows just about how much Kalou is worth and decided that if he was going to overpay, it wouldn't be for his quality.

What is embarrassing, though, is a professed total Gooner constantly pizzing on the club he supposedly supports.

FASLG!
Embarrassing is why Wenger is even interested in him at all. Keep pretending like you agree with the move to bring him in.
Now we must pass rumour off as fact: when it suits our agenda.

And when I say something: "prove it, prove it, prove it Santry"

;)
But you never do prove it though do you. In fact you post more unsubstantiated rumours on here than anybody, so it should be asked of you, when is a rumour to be given any credence ?

Answer. When is suits santry's particular argument de jour, & a Kalou move to Arsenal certainly wouldn't do that would it
I post unsubstantiated rumours?

Nice try. When we had the Higuain bid in the summer I posted what his father said. And guess what,.... It turned out there was a bid confirmed by Ancellotti...even though Piz lived in utter denial. When we entered into negotiations for Villa I posted that Graham Hunter saw the Arsenal entourage in Barca. When we went after Arteta I posted what a former Arsenal scout said to a journalist about tracking him for three years.. Though Piz has for whatever reason mocked that. Before we swooped for Podolski I posted what FC cologne officials were saying in the German newspapers.

I don't only rely on direct quotes. I discount what slimy agents say because the guff about 'watched by Arsenal' is free headline grabbing spin. But what I throw in there is either badged as a 'rumour' or I ask people if they think it's true if I'm not sure.

That's a bit better than unsubstantiated. Unlike your fictional spits by Arsenal players, or fouls committed by Arsenal defenders, or basically anything you have to say about our team..... Troll.
Yes, you do post unsubstantiated rumours claiming them as your "reliable source" , one of these was a cheap London metro rag as I recall

Now, are you simply discounting Wengers past or current possible interest in Kalou because you doubt it has any substance or because given your constant harrassment of certain posters about him, you simply don't want to believe it ? Maybe both
Don't be an utter dickhead. Did Wenger look at Kalou in this transfer window? No. Did he look at Kalou previously? Perhaps, but also unsubstantiated. Say what you like and throw a bone to the brotherhood of victim hood, I'm not the one who started dozens of threads that went RVP<Kalou. I expect Phato knows all about that, because he was the sparring partner.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

santry_gooner
Feb 1 2014, 04:13 AM
billabog5
Jan 31 2014, 09:55 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 04:33 PM
billabog5
Jan 31 2014, 04:10 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:50 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:31 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Jan 31 2014, 02:29 PM
dream_team
Jan 31 2014, 02:19 PM
santry_gooner
Jan 31 2014, 02:09 PM
Ha! It must be the recycling of every rumour going back ten years. Still, I'm betting RVP would consider his chance of a return to us over if that happened. Wouldn't he Phato?
What do you have to say to Wenger, he wanted to get Kalou and he got rejected, embarrassing isn't it?
Embarrassing would be if Wenger overpaid for him. I would imagine that Arsene knows just about how much Kalou is worth and decided that if he was going to overpay, it wouldn't be for his quality.

What is embarrassing, though, is a professed total Gooner constantly pizzing on the club he supposedly supports.

FASLG!
Embarrassing is why Wenger is even interested in him at all. Keep pretending like you agree with the move to bring him in.
Now we must pass rumour off as fact: when it suits our agenda.

And when I say something: "prove it, prove it, prove it Santry"

;)
But you never do prove it though do you. In fact you post more unsubstantiated rumours on here than anybody, so it should be asked of you, when is a rumour to be given any credence ?

Answer. When is suits santry's particular argument de jour, & a Kalou move to Arsenal certainly wouldn't do that would it
I post unsubstantiated rumours?

Nice try. When we had the Higuain bid in the summer I posted what his father said. And guess what,.... It turned out there was a bid confirmed by Ancellotti...even though Piz lived in utter denial. When we entered into negotiations for Villa I posted that Graham Hunter saw the Arsenal entourage in Barca. When we went after Arteta I posted what a former Arsenal scout said to a journalist about tracking him for three years.. Though Piz has for whatever reason mocked that. Before we swooped for Podolski I posted what FC cologne officials were saying in the German newspapers.

I don't only rely on direct quotes. I discount what slimy agents say because the guff about 'watched by Arsenal' is free headline grabbing spin. But what I throw in there is either badged as a 'rumour' or I ask people if they think it's true if I'm not sure.

That's a bit better than unsubstantiated. Unlike your fictional spits by Arsenal players, or fouls committed by Arsenal defenders, or basically anything you have to say about our team..... Troll.
Yes, you do post unsubstantiated rumours claiming them as your "reliable source" , one of these was a cheap London metro rag as I recall

Now, are you simply discounting Wengers past or current possible interest in Kalou because you doubt it has any substance or because given your constant harrassment of certain posters about him, you simply don't want to believe it ? Maybe both
Don't be an utter dickhead. Did Wenger look at Kalou in this transfer window? No. Did he look at Kalou previously? Perhaps, but also unsubstantiated. Say what you like and throw a bone to the brotherhood of victim hood, I'm not the one who started dozens of threads that went RVP<Kalou. I expect Phato knows all about that, because he was the sparring partner.
"Did Wenger look at Kalou in this transfer window? No. Did he look at Kalou previously? Perhaps, but also unsubstantiated. '


Unsubstantiated, Really ?

http://www.arsenal.com/news/news-archive/wenger-my-summer-interest-in-salomon-kalou

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create your own social network with a free forum.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply