|
Maureen again proves a lack of class
|
|
Topic Started: Aug 12 2015, 08:16 PM (1,406 Views)
|
|
chillyheat
|
Sep 28 2015, 12:46 PM
Post #121
|
|
- Posts:
- 13,509
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #35
- Joined:
- Jul 17, 2013
|
- Joe Bobs Fine Foods
- Sep 28 2015, 12:09 PM
- JustOneDennisBergkamp
- Sep 28 2015, 12:04 PM
- chillyheat
- Sep 28 2015, 11:48 AM
- JustOneDennisBergkamp
- Sep 27 2015, 07:32 PM
- dream_team
- Sep 27 2015, 12:20 PM
- JustOneDennisBergkamp
- Sep 27 2015, 11:39 AM
Keep flingin' that poo, you little monkey. It's what you're good at.
U fuckin racist!
Chilly has been called a monkey by me because of his liking of flinging his feces like one, so fuck off, clown.
posters wincing, cringing & gasping at jodb who derives massive pleasure from calling a nigga a monkey all coz chilli won't let him live down epic stupidity. as weak as it gets on zeta. sigh.....
I'll tell you what - you know that my comparing you with a monkey has everything to do with your propensity for poo flinging and nothing to do with the color of your skin. But out of deference to pizzy's sensibilities (I couldn't give two fucks about you, cockmuncher), I will apologize to him and refrain from applying the term to you again, regardless of my meaning. Now, respectfully, fuck off the both of you.
I predict that is the very last time you'll hear this from either of them ever. we shall see joe, we shall see.
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Sep 28 2015, 01:18 PM
Post #122
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- jays712
- Sep 28 2015, 08:04 AM
Dein alone is responsible for Usmanov getting into Arsenal. Not the entire club. The guy sold out to him and how could that have been stopped back then? Maybe if was vetted more than the club could've went into lock down mode earlier to stop Dein. They did it to prevent Usmanov from getting to 30% ownership.
My view is that Dein saw what was happening at Chelsea and figured that was the way to go with another super rich owner. Background be damned. What percent of Chelsea fan boys care about Roman's past exploits? Most sins are forgiven if their club is winning. It's not right but that's a fact. Not really then issue jay. The fact is while Arsenal fans are calling Chelsea because of their owner , Arsenal have Usmanov who is every bit as dodgy
I could add that they are managed by a philanderer & have a history of serial drink drivers & druggies as ex players .
People in glass houses.... Just saying
|
|
|
| |
|
cruyff_turn
|
Sep 28 2015, 01:38 PM
Post #123
|
|
Administrator
- Posts:
- 8,067
- Group:
- Admins
- Member
- #1
- Joined:
- Jul 3, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Sep 28 2015, 01:18 PM
- jays712
- Sep 28 2015, 08:04 AM
Dein alone is responsible for Usmanov getting into Arsenal. Not the entire club. The guy sold out to him and how could that have been stopped back then? Maybe if was vetted more than the club could've went into lock down mode earlier to stop Dein. They did it to prevent Usmanov from getting to 30% ownership.
My view is that Dein saw what was happening at Chelsea and figured that was the way to go with another super rich owner. Background be damned. What percent of Chelsea fan boys care about Roman's past exploits? Most sins are forgiven if their club is winning. It's not right but that's a fact.
Not really then issue jay. The fact is while Arsenal fans are calling Chelsea because of their owner , Arsenal have Usmanov who is every bit as dodgy I could add that they are managed by a philanderer & have a history of serial drink drivers & druggies as ex players . People in glass houses.... Just saying Except Usmanov isn't actually putting any money into the club, and the board never wanted him in the first place.
|
|
|
| |
|
jays712
|
Sep 28 2015, 02:24 PM
Post #124
|
|
- Posts:
- 7,532
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #25
- Joined:
- Jul 10, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Sep 28 2015, 01:18 PM
Not really then issue jay. The fact is while Arsenal fans are calling Chelsea because of their owner , Arsenal have Usmanov who is every bit as dodgy
I could add that they are managed by a philanderer & have a history of serial drink drivers & druggies as ex players .
People in glass houses.... Just saying Usmanov is every bit as dodgy. Nothing can be done about it now though. He can't be forced out. He owns the shares. The club has iced him as much as they can. He's powerless in every way imaginable other than popping off at the mouth. Me or u have as much say in how the club is run Billa. That's a fact. The only thing Usmanov is getting is a nice profit on his shares should be sell them.
As for him getting into the club, Usmanov was the end product of one guy (Dein) who thought that was only way forward was to get urself a sugar daddy. The only thing the club could've done was institute a lock down on selling shares earlier. Why it didn't happen is totally unknown. Maybe Dein rushed in to a deal with Usmanov before a lock down could happen.
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Sep 28 2015, 02:40 PM
Post #125
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- cruyff_turn
- Sep 28 2015, 01:38 PM
- billabog5
- Sep 28 2015, 01:18 PM
- jays712
- Sep 28 2015, 08:04 AM
Dein alone is responsible for Usmanov getting into Arsenal. Not the entire club. The guy sold out to him and how could that have been stopped back then? Maybe if was vetted more than the club could've went into lock down mode earlier to stop Dein. They did it to prevent Usmanov from getting to 30% ownership.
My view is that Dein saw what was happening at Chelsea and figured that was the way to go with another super rich owner. Background be damned. What percent of Chelsea fan boys care about Roman's past exploits? Most sins are forgiven if their club is winning. It's not right but that's a fact.
Not really then issue jay. The fact is while Arsenal fans are calling Chelsea because of their owner , Arsenal have Usmanov who is every bit as dodgy I could add that they are managed by a philanderer & have a history of serial drink drivers & druggies as ex players . People in glass houses.... Just saying
Except Usmanov isn't actually putting any money into the club, and the board never wanted him in the first place. Right,so that's so much better having someone like usmanov at the club but not actually putting money in ?? Great counter cruyyf 😳
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Sep 28 2015, 02:42 PM
Post #126
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- jays712
- Sep 28 2015, 02:24 PM
- billabog5
- Sep 28 2015, 01:18 PM
Not really then issue jay. The fact is while Arsenal fans are calling Chelsea because of their owner , Arsenal have Usmanov who is every bit as dodgy
I could add that they are managed by a philanderer & have a history of serial drink drivers & druggies as ex players .
People in glass houses.... Just saying
Usmanov is every bit as dodgy. Nothing can be done about it now though. He can't be forced out. He owns the shares. The club has iced him as much as they can. He's powerless in every way imaginable other than popping off at the mouth. Me or u have as much say in how the club is run Billa. That's a fact. The only thing Usmanov is getting is a nice profit on his shares should be sell them. As for him getting into the club, Usmanov was the end product of one guy (Dein) who thought that was only way forward was to get urself a sugar daddy. The only thing the club could've done was institute a lock down on selling shares earlier. Why it didn't happen is totally unknown. Maybe Dein rushed in to a deal with Usmanov before a lock down could happen. If he's got shares & has no intention of selling but only taking dividends then give me Abramivich any day
|
|
|
| |
|
tallsmile28
|
Sep 28 2015, 02:44 PM
Post #127
|
|
- Posts:
- 2,222
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #17
- Joined:
- Jul 5, 2013
|
- rw_mlite2
- Sep 25 2015, 02:40 PM
- billabog5
- Sep 25 2015, 02:14 PM
- dsch15
- Sep 25 2015, 01:44 PM
- billabog5
- Sep 25 2015, 01:12 PM
- dsch15
- Sep 25 2015, 11:43 AM
- KamyFC
- Sep 25 2015, 11:11 AM
Wow. he ripped into Wenger here.
----------------------------------------
Mourinho was asked about the pressure on Steve McClaren, the boss of Newcastle.
He appeared to take the opportunity to wade into Wenger but, when when asked if he meant the Arsenal manager, declined to name the Frenchman, a long-time adversary.
"I think in this country, only one manager is not under pressure,'' Mourinho said. "Steve is under pressure, I am under pressure, Brendan [Rodgers, the Liverpool boss] is under pressure, [Manchester City's Manuel] Pellegrini is under pressure.
"We cannot lose matches, we cannot be below expectations. There is one that for some reason is outside that list. Good for him.''
"Just one out of 20,'' he added.
The Blues boss was asked for a name again and, although he would not name him, he appeared to be referring to Wenger, who pushed him in the Stamford Bridge technical area in October 2014. He has been Arsenal boss since October 1996.
"You know,'' Mourinho said.
"He can speak about the referees before the game, can speak about the referees after the game, can push people in the technical area, can cry in the morning, can cry in the afternoon, nothing happens. Can be not achieved, keep the job, still the king. It's a privilege.''
I don't know how he walks upright with that big a chip on his shoulder.
Is it a chip on his shoulder or is he just goading Wenger ? No doubt a lot of this is fallout from the Costa suspension Gabriel exoneration fiasco but when you have someone's number like he has Wengers, its hard to see why he would have a chip on his shoulder. Maybe its just a very strong dislike for the man &/or a liking for winding him up
Well, one man's fiasco is another man's justice. Although a more apt cliché comes to mind for Arsenal fans: "Justice delayed is justice denied." But to my original point... It is hard to understand why a man with his record (and not just against Wenger) always sounds so bitter.
I think the vast majority of his comments are pre meditated wind ups , this latest one I feel is a tad bitter but spiced with the same wind up intent. Whatever his motives it seems to work for him
I think it goes beyond a wind up when it comes to Wenger. I really do think he's bitter that Wenger seemingly has a job for life no matter the results. Whether or not you agree with Mou's take (there's truth to it), it does make me think that all the wins vs Wenger aren't enough for him. Is it working for him? His team is in disarray, they cant even beat Newcastle. If he's champion of the league, why does he care so much about AW? To me its pathetic.
|
|
|
| |
|
dsch15
|
Sep 28 2015, 03:15 PM
Post #128
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,526
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #15
- Joined:
- Jul 5, 2013
|
- cruyff_turn
- Sep 28 2015, 01:38 PM
- billabog5
- Sep 28 2015, 01:18 PM
- jays712
- Sep 28 2015, 08:04 AM
Dein alone is responsible for Usmanov getting into Arsenal. Not the entire club. The guy sold out to him and how could that have been stopped back then? Maybe if was vetted more than the club could've went into lock down mode earlier to stop Dein. They did it to prevent Usmanov from getting to 30% ownership.
My view is that Dein saw what was happening at Chelsea and figured that was the way to go with another super rich owner. Background be damned. What percent of Chelsea fan boys care about Roman's past exploits? Most sins are forgiven if their club is winning. It's not right but that's a fact.
Not really then issue jay. The fact is while Arsenal fans are calling Chelsea because of their owner , Arsenal have Usmanov who is every bit as dodgy I could add that they are managed by a philanderer & have a history of serial drink drivers & druggies as ex players . People in glass houses.... Just saying
Except Usmanov isn't actually putting any money into the club, and the board never wanted him in the first place. Apart from which quite a few Arsenal fans on this board have expressed a great deal of dismay over Usmanov's involvement. We've been pretty consistent about the fact we don't want ill-gotten gains bankrolling our success.
And I wonder what sort of arithmetic equates cheating on one's spouse with the felonies detailed in the original post.
|
|
|
| |
|
jays712
|
Sep 28 2015, 03:49 PM
Post #129
|
|
- Posts:
- 7,532
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #25
- Joined:
- Jul 10, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Sep 28 2015, 02:42 PM
- jays712
- Sep 28 2015, 02:24 PM
- billabog5
- Sep 28 2015, 01:18 PM
Not really then issue jay. The fact is while Arsenal fans are calling Chelsea because of their owner , Arsenal have Usmanov who is every bit as dodgy
I could add that they are managed by a philanderer & have a history of serial drink drivers & druggies as ex players .
People in glass houses.... Just saying
Usmanov is every bit as dodgy. Nothing can be done about it now though. He can't be forced out. He owns the shares. The club has iced him as much as they can. He's powerless in every way imaginable other than popping off at the mouth. Me or u have as much say in how the club is run Billa. That's a fact. The only thing Usmanov is getting is a nice profit on his shares should be sell them. As for him getting into the club, Usmanov was the end product of one guy (Dein) who thought that was only way forward was to get urself a sugar daddy. The only thing the club could've done was institute a lock down on selling shares earlier. Why it didn't happen is totally unknown. Maybe Dein rushed in to a deal with Usmanov before a lock down could happen.
If he's got shares & has no intention of selling but only taking dividends then give me Abramivich any day Hold on here Billa. On one hand, ur knocking "classy" Arsenal for having Usmanov (and all his warts) owning some of the club but then u say u would rather have Roman (and all his warts) since he spends.
|
|
|
| |
|
Joe Bobs Fine Foods
|
Sep 28 2015, 04:18 PM
Post #130
|
|
- Posts:
- 4,007
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #10
- Joined:
- Jul 4, 2013
|
- dsch15
- Sep 28 2015, 03:15 PM
- cruyff_turn
- Sep 28 2015, 01:38 PM
- billabog5
- Sep 28 2015, 01:18 PM
- jays712
- Sep 28 2015, 08:04 AM
Dein alone is responsible for Usmanov getting into Arsenal. Not the entire club. The guy sold out to him and how could that have been stopped back then? Maybe if was vetted more than the club could've went into lock down mode earlier to stop Dein. They did it to prevent Usmanov from getting to 30% ownership.
My view is that Dein saw what was happening at Chelsea and figured that was the way to go with another super rich owner. Background be damned. What percent of Chelsea fan boys care about Roman's past exploits? Most sins are forgiven if their club is winning. It's not right but that's a fact.
Not really then issue jay. The fact is while Arsenal fans are calling Chelsea because of their owner , Arsenal have Usmanov who is every bit as dodgy I could add that they are managed by a philanderer & have a history of serial drink drivers & druggies as ex players . People in glass houses.... Just saying
Except Usmanov isn't actually putting any money into the club, and the board never wanted him in the first place.
Apart from which quite a few Arsenal fans on this board have expressed a great deal of dismay over Usmanov's involvement. We've been pretty consistent about the fact we don't want ill-gotten gains bankrolling our success. And I wonder what sort of arithmetic equates cheating on one's spouse with the felonies detailed in the original post. Well when your club's greatest players are philanderers - with multiple prostitutes at a time - I suppose you grasp at straws.
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|