Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
John Stones and the team that ran away with the title 3 months ago!
Topic Started: Sep 12 2015, 08:37 AM (967 Views)
dream_team
Member Avatar

SadlerTheKing
Sep 17 2015, 08:30 PM
dream_team
Sep 16 2015, 06:04 AM
SadlerTheKing
Sep 15 2015, 02:25 PM
dream_team
Sep 15 2015, 10:41 AM
SadlerTheKing
Sep 15 2015, 09:19 AM
dream_team
Sep 15 2015, 04:06 AM
Bog still avoiding talking about John Stones lol
Idon't know why you keep saying that!?!? Nobody ever said anything bad about him. Nobody. But you are making it out like we did. We all said that he has potential and could be a great player. Many would say that Hummels is world class. I don't think you will find many who will say that about Stones still. Most will say he has the potential to be world class, but again, this is potential. You seem to think that you've had some "eureka" moment that didn't really happen lol
Actually a lot already are, and I haven't heard a lot of people calling Hummels world class apart from Hummels people. And BTW I find it funny how you think I'm wrong because I said Stones was better than Hummels about four months ago and not now. Because stones have improves massively since May right ? LOL. He WAS and he IS better than Matt fckin Hummels...
Would someone please explain to piz what potential means. Stones is definitely the treat of the week. Will he keep it up? I hope so. Is he proven? No. Is Hummels proven? Yes. Does Stones have the potential to be a better player? Yes. Is he currently playing better? Yes. Does that make him a better player? No. Keep it up and he will be though.
All I know is John Stones has proven he's better than Matt fckin Hummels....
Has he? How is that? Again, I am not saying that he is or he isn't. I am claiming that you have no fucking idea how good either of them are because you don't watch that much football. You don't watch Everton play every week and you certainly don't watch Dortmund. So just admit that you are once again talking out of your ass and move on...
I've watched enough of the two to know who's better. And how do you know Hummels was better (that's what you said months ago, I see you're now doing a backflip), is it they said, he said?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dream_team
Member Avatar

billabog5
Sep 18 2015, 12:26 AM
dream_team
Sep 17 2015, 04:57 PM
billabog5
Sep 17 2015, 02:28 PM
dream_team
Sep 17 2015, 10:49 AM
billabog5
Sep 17 2015, 02:56 AM
dream_team
Sep 15 2015, 04:05 AM
billabog5
Sep 15 2015, 12:28 AM
jays712
Sep 12 2015, 10:01 AM
dream_team
Sep 12 2015, 08:50 AM
jays712
Sep 12 2015, 08:43 AM
What happened u ask? They fucking suck and I love every second of it. I don't even care why they suck. I'm just happy about it.
I'm comparing it to man utd under Moyes, because according to some people it's impossible to go from a team that ran away with the title to a struggling team the next season
I know dream. I've had the same fight with Billa and Sadler about this. That argument might be the only one where me and Santry agreed on something. LOL
I think the current City team prove you both wrong. same personnel as last season, when everybody, including both you & I Pizzy, said they were a spent force, getting too old & badly in need of new blood. Here we are, 5 games in & no goals conceded & 5 straight wins with that same team plus one wildly overrated squad player they added. The desire is back .Kompany , Toure & even Silva look revitalised .

Nobody saw this happening to Chelsea, so how can you say you saw it happening at Utd ? & Utd did have replacements for the ageing defenders apart from Evra. Now, if Chelsea turn this around what would be the chances of Pizzy saying he was wrong ?? Probably about the same as JODB admitting what a jackass he was saying he would rather Arsenal lose 10-0 in the CL KO stages than win the Europa League

Not sure anyone said they were a spent force, they were getting too old and if you just think about this more you'll realise
1)New blood has been playing their part so far, Sterling despite not playing well gives them something they lack , Mangala has stepped up to replace the OLD demichelis and if there was no De bruyne and Kelechi at the weekend they would have drew that game, that's new blood for you Billabog

2)And yaya Toure is getting OLD, He's 32 FFS, there's a reason you're not a football manager, if you notice there's was a period last season that man city went on a run, so they are well capable of going on a run which is what they've basically done at the start of the season. The real issue is that they can't go for a whole season, hence the NEED for new bloods, trust me Yaya Toure won't be like this all season, he's going to go on a run where he'll be non existent and trust me without the new bloods, Sterling,De bruyne,Delph, Kelechi, Otamendi they would drop a lot of points.
Notice there are FIVE names there and not just England SAVIOUR...
PMSL

You have continually slaughtered both Mangala & Sterling & now you are attributing City's great start to them ??

How many minutes of the 450 played have Delph [ another player you have slaughtered ] De Bruyne, Kelechi & Otamendi played in total ?

Also tell me you condescending little fuck which team you are currently managing ? I mean, which football manager wouldn't want Alexis in their team ?

Had Utd gone with SAF or Mou & not Moyes , they would, even with that same squad, have still challenged for the title, they may not have won it, but the would have challenged & absolutely certainly would not have finished 7th. Van Gaal is lucky that currently he is being judged against Moyes & not SAF
Even YOU can see that Mangala of this season has been different from last, I didn't mention only delph, I mentioned FIVE players plus 'new' players like Mangala who are now getting a run in the team unlike last season when they relied on grand pa Demichelis.

" I mean, which football manager wouldn't want Alexis in their team ?" Try the barca coach lol....
Can you read ?

I named all FIVE players you mentioned & I asked you [ Sterling aside who is absolutely crap so there no way he could have improved the team] how many total minutes they have played this season .
I tell you what come back to me when England biggest hope learn how to shoot a ball properly lol.
LOL, Sterling has a better goals per game ratio in the premier league than Ozil or Oxlade Chamberlain you dimwitted clown. A goal every 5 games is more than acceptable for an attacking midfielder or winger. Amazing how well City are doing with this no hoper playing

So Barca not picking Alexis makes him a poor player & not good enough for Arsenal ? Please tell me you have more than these pathetic points to come back with Pizzy
Give your head a shake, you asked which coach wouldn't won Alexis in their team, and I mentioned the coach who dumped him? you sure u're ok?
Lol Ox plays exclusively as a winger, sometimes even a CM, Ozil plays as a no10, none of these two are strikers, on the other hand you and the other Sterling fan boys see him as an attacking midfielder/Striker , yet he can't shoot a ball properly LOL, you said City will start him ahead of Bony,Dzeko etc in forward positions Trees and Cruyff said he'll be competing with Giroud upfront, so you see you're comparing Sterling to the wrong players LOL.

So since you and the Raheem fan boys say he's being playing at a high level, do you want to see how he compares to his "competitors" in the last two seasons?
Edited by dream_team, Sep 18 2015, 02:56 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

dream_team
Sep 18 2015, 02:52 AM
billabog5
Sep 18 2015, 12:26 AM
dream_team
Sep 17 2015, 04:57 PM
billabog5
Sep 17 2015, 02:28 PM
dream_team
Sep 17 2015, 10:49 AM
billabog5
Sep 17 2015, 02:56 AM
dream_team
Sep 15 2015, 04:05 AM
billabog5
Sep 15 2015, 12:28 AM
jays712
Sep 12 2015, 10:01 AM
dream_team
Sep 12 2015, 08:50 AM
jays712
Sep 12 2015, 08:43 AM
What happened u ask? They fucking suck and I love every second of it. I don't even care why they suck. I'm just happy about it.
I'm comparing it to man utd under Moyes, because according to some people it's impossible to go from a team that ran away with the title to a struggling team the next season
I know dream. I've had the same fight with Billa and Sadler about this. That argument might be the only one where me and Santry agreed on something. LOL
I think the current City team prove you both wrong. same personnel as last season, when everybody, including both you & I Pizzy, said they were a spent force, getting too old & badly in need of new blood. Here we are, 5 games in & no goals conceded & 5 straight wins with that same team plus one wildly overrated squad player they added. The desire is back .Kompany , Toure & even Silva look revitalised .

Nobody saw this happening to Chelsea, so how can you say you saw it happening at Utd ? & Utd did have replacements for the ageing defenders apart from Evra. Now, if Chelsea turn this around what would be the chances of Pizzy saying he was wrong ?? Probably about the same as JODB admitting what a jackass he was saying he would rather Arsenal lose 10-0 in the CL KO stages than win the Europa League

Not sure anyone said they were a spent force, they were getting too old and if you just think about this more you'll realise
1)New blood has been playing their part so far, Sterling despite not playing well gives them something they lack , Mangala has stepped up to replace the OLD demichelis and if there was no De bruyne and Kelechi at the weekend they would have drew that game, that's new blood for you Billabog

2)And yaya Toure is getting OLD, He's 32 FFS, there's a reason you're not a football manager, if you notice there's was a period last season that man city went on a run, so they are well capable of going on a run which is what they've basically done at the start of the season. The real issue is that they can't go for a whole season, hence the NEED for new bloods, trust me Yaya Toure won't be like this all season, he's going to go on a run where he'll be non existent and trust me without the new bloods, Sterling,De bruyne,Delph, Kelechi, Otamendi they would drop a lot of points.
Notice there are FIVE names there and not just England SAVIOUR...
PMSL

You have continually slaughtered both Mangala & Sterling & now you are attributing City's great start to them ??

How many minutes of the 450 played have Delph [ another player you have slaughtered ] De Bruyne, Kelechi & Otamendi played in total ?

Also tell me you condescending little fuck which team you are currently managing ? I mean, which football manager wouldn't want Alexis in their team ?

Had Utd gone with SAF or Mou & not Moyes , they would, even with that same squad, have still challenged for the title, they may not have won it, but the would have challenged & absolutely certainly would not have finished 7th. Van Gaal is lucky that currently he is being judged against Moyes & not SAF
Even YOU can see that Mangala of this season has been different from last, I didn't mention only delph, I mentioned FIVE players plus 'new' players like Mangala who are now getting a run in the team unlike last season when they relied on grand pa Demichelis.

" I mean, which football manager wouldn't want Alexis in their team ?" Try the barca coach lol....
Can you read ?

I named all FIVE players you mentioned & I asked you [ Sterling aside who is absolutely crap so there no way he could have improved the team] how many total minutes they have played this season .
I tell you what come back to me when England biggest hope learn how to shoot a ball properly lol.
LOL, Sterling has a better goals per game ratio in the premier league than Ozil or Oxlade Chamberlain you dimwitted clown. A goal every 5 games is more than acceptable for an attacking midfielder or winger. Amazing how well City are doing with this no hoper playing

So Barca not picking Alexis makes him a poor player & not good enough for Arsenal ? Please tell me you have more than these pathetic points to come back with Pizzy
Give your head a shake, you asked which coach wouldn't won Alexis in their team, and I mentioned the coach who dumped him? you sure u're ok?
Lol Ox plays exclusively as a winger, sometimes even a CM, Ozil plays as a no10, none of these two are strikers, on the other hand you and the other Sterling fan boys see him as an attacking midfielder/Striker , yet he can't shoot a ball properly LOL, you said City will start him ahead of Bony,Dzeko etc in forward positions Trees and Cruyff said he'll be competing with Giroud upfront, so you see you're comparing Sterling to the wrong players LOL.

So since you and the Raheem fan boys say he's being playing at a high level, do you want to see how he compares to his "competitors" in the last two seasons?
Tell you what Pizzy, you show me where I have ever said Sterling is a striker. He has played wingback, wing & the number 10 role. Not that dissimilar to Ox & Ozil. Methinks poor Pizzy is clutching at straws here & really struggling to come up with any
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

dream_team
Sep 18 2015, 02:48 AM
SadlerTheKing
Sep 17 2015, 08:30 PM
dream_team
Sep 16 2015, 06:04 AM
SadlerTheKing
Sep 15 2015, 02:25 PM
dream_team
Sep 15 2015, 10:41 AM
SadlerTheKing
Sep 15 2015, 09:19 AM
dream_team
Sep 15 2015, 04:06 AM
Bog still avoiding talking about John Stones lol
Idon't know why you keep saying that!?!? Nobody ever said anything bad about him. Nobody. But you are making it out like we did. We all said that he has potential and could be a great player. Many would say that Hummels is world class. I don't think you will find many who will say that about Stones still. Most will say he has the potential to be world class, but again, this is potential. You seem to think that you've had some "eureka" moment that didn't really happen lol
Actually a lot already are, and I haven't heard a lot of people calling Hummels world class apart from Hummels people. And BTW I find it funny how you think I'm wrong because I said Stones was better than Hummels about four months ago and not now. Because stones have improves massively since May right ? LOL. He WAS and he IS better than Matt fckin Hummels...
Would someone please explain to piz what potential means. Stones is definitely the treat of the week. Will he keep it up? I hope so. Is he proven? No. Is Hummels proven? Yes. Does Stones have the potential to be a better player? Yes. Is he currently playing better? Yes. Does that make him a better player? No. Keep it up and he will be though.
All I know is John Stones has proven he's better than Matt fckin Hummels....
Has he? How is that? Again, I am not saying that he is or he isn't. I am claiming that you have no fucking idea how good either of them are because you don't watch that much football. You don't watch Everton play every week and you certainly don't watch Dortmund. So just admit that you are once again talking out of your ass and move on...
I've watched enough of the two to know who's better. And how do you know Hummels was better (that's what you said months ago, I see you're now doing a backflip), is it they said, he said?
Really ? You say you have watched enough of both to decide who is the better player ? You really think you are that well qualified to not just offer an opinion, but offer it as hard fact when you barely watch either play

I think you are a liar Pizzy, I will call it right now, liar liar pants on fire pizzy . I don't believe you have watched much of either player. I had my suspicions the other week when you declared Utd v Newcastle a borefest based on the 0-0 & then when called out you said " errm, well I did miss the 1st 30 minutes "

We both know you didn't see the game, you are entering santry territory here Pizzy
Edited by billabog5, Sep 18 2015, 01:54 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Member Avatar
JODB
billabog5
Sep 18 2015, 12:22 AM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Sep 17 2015, 04:11 PM
billabog5
Sep 17 2015, 02:25 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Sep 17 2015, 09:40 AM
These two fuckwits either are too stupid to get what I meant or just can't get themselves out of third grade and off the end of the bar. Keep crowing clowns.
I gave you the opportunity to modify your initial statement but you refused so how can it mean anything other than what you wrote, which as i initially said was just plain silly. You really are a pigheaded simpleton
I don't have to modify shit for you or the other stiff challenged fella. I'll put it to you like this:

If my club was given the choice of being in the CL knockout phase or an automatic berth to the final of the Europa League, I would take the former every time. Yes, every time, even if my team got clobbered in the CL and was given the same option the following season. Choosing the easy road to a consolation prize is a coward's path.

When I was a teenager, I was a bowler with an average in the mid-180s. I could have won trophies galore bowling in lesser leagues, but as soon as I was asked to bowl in a scratch travel league with top youth bowlers from all around the area, I leapt at the opportunity. Mind you, this league was stacked with bowlers with averages at and even over 200, so I never won a single trophy, but occasionally, my partner and I would knock off a far better duo, and that was satisfying enough, far more satisfying than the league titles and individual trophies I could have won in lesser competitions.

If you would choose Europa in this scenario, add coward to the word idiot on your business card.
LOL JODB posts ... " I don't have to modify shit for you or the other stiff challenged fella." .....& then immediately writes a complete modification of what he originally wrote .

You really are an embarrassment at times old man
Maneuver all you wish, clown. Only a coward or an idiot would choose to play a lesser competition for a greater chance of success, so which are you? Say both, and you win a cigar.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

Listen you halfwit.
The scenario you are now trying to paint is nothing like the original one you posted. The post I called you out for had Arsenal getting absolutely humiliated in one comp & winning the other & you chose humiliation

Now stop being a cunt, accept that as usual you engaged your big mouth before your tiny brain could process the shit emanating from said big mouth & we can move on. Nobody has said they would rather enter the Europa League in preference to the Champions league.

Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Member Avatar
JODB
Stupid little man. The only thing I decided to change for the sake of discussion was being assured of winning Europa to being given an automatic berth in the final. Other than that, my convictions remain absolutely the same, even if you are too dumb and/or stubborn to understand that.

Here it is again (read slowly): I would gladly take the chance of being thrashed 10-nil in the first knockout stage with an opportunity to win arguably the most prestigious trophy on the planet rather than being assured of not only a place in the Europa Final, but EVEN being assured of winning it as well.

That's the kind of competitor I am. You, on the other hand, are a mentally challenged little pussy.

Cheers!
Edited by JustOneDennisBergkamp, Sep 18 2015, 09:19 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

JustOneDennisBergkamp
Sep 18 2015, 09:19 PM
Stupid little man. The only thing I decided to change for the sake of discussion was being assured of winning Europa to being given an automatic berth in the final. Other than that, my convictions remain absolutely the same, even if you are too dumb and/or stubborn to understand that.

Here it is again (read slowly): I would gladly take the chance of being thrashed 10-nil in the first knockout stage with an opportunity to win arguably the most prestigious trophy on the planet rather than being assured of not only a place in the Europa Final, but EVEN being assured of winning it as well.

That's the kind of competitor I am. You, on the other hand, are a mentally challenged little pussy.

Cheers!
Still not quite where you started, but we are making progress . You didn't say " I would gladly take the chance of being thrashed 10-0 ", You said " I would rather get thrashed 10 -0 "

Huge difference, that on top of now acknowledging winning the Europa League isn't a bad outcome [ which if you remember was what I pointed out to you originally]

Your current stance is nothing like your original statement, had you said what you are saying now we wouldn't be here still arguing over it . I will post a recent quote from someone on here that will explain things better for you

"When folks post rubbish on a public forum, they reasonably expect someone to call them out for it."
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Member Avatar
JODB
billabog5
Sep 18 2015, 09:25 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Sep 18 2015, 09:19 PM
Stupid little man. The only thing I decided to change for the sake of discussion was being assured of winning Europa to being given an automatic berth in the final. Other than that, my convictions remain absolutely the same, even if you are too dumb and/or stubborn to understand that.

Here it is again (read slowly): I would gladly take the chance of being thrashed 10-nil in the first knockout stage with an opportunity to win arguably the most prestigious trophy on the planet rather than being assured of not only a place in the Europa Final, but EVEN being assured of winning it as well.

That's the kind of competitor I am. You, on the other hand, are a mentally challenged little pussy.

Cheers!
Still not quite where you started, but we are making progress . You didn't say " I would gladly take the chance of being thrashed 10-0 ", You said " I would rather get thrashed 10 -0 "

Huge difference, that on top of now acknowledging winning the Europa League isn't a bad outcome [ which if you remember was what I pointed out to you originally]

Your current stance is nothing like your original statement, had you said what you are saying now we wouldn't be here still arguing over it . I will post a recent quote from someone on here that will explain things better for you

"When folks post rubbish on a public forum, they reasonably expect someone to call them out for it."
The only reason that we are still arguing is that you're a pathetic loser. In saying I'd rather be thrashed 10-nil in the CL than win Europa, I am CLEARLY expressing a preference for being in the better competition no matter what the relative odds of success. Clear to an intelligent poster, anyway.

Hurry, there's still time to cash your government assistance check and then claim your favorite stool at the end of the bar.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

JustOneDennisBergkamp
Sep 18 2015, 09:39 PM
billabog5
Sep 18 2015, 09:25 PM
JustOneDennisBergkamp
Sep 18 2015, 09:19 PM
Stupid little man. The only thing I decided to change for the sake of discussion was being assured of winning Europa to being given an automatic berth in the final. Other than that, my convictions remain absolutely the same, even if you are too dumb and/or stubborn to understand that.

Here it is again (read slowly): I would gladly take the chance of being thrashed 10-nil in the first knockout stage with an opportunity to win arguably the most prestigious trophy on the planet rather than being assured of not only a place in the Europa Final, but EVEN being assured of winning it as well.

That's the kind of competitor I am. You, on the other hand, are a mentally challenged little pussy.

Cheers!
Still not quite where you started, but we are making progress . You didn't say " I would gladly take the chance of being thrashed 10-0 ", You said " I would rather get thrashed 10 -0 "

Huge difference, that on top of now acknowledging winning the Europa League isn't a bad outcome [ which if you remember was what I pointed out to you originally]

Your current stance is nothing like your original statement, had you said what you are saying now we wouldn't be here still arguing over it . I will post a recent quote from someone on here that will explain things better for you

"When folks post rubbish on a public forum, they reasonably expect someone to call them out for it."
The only reason that we are still arguing is that you're a pathetic loser. In saying I'd rather be thrashed 10-nil in the CL than win Europa, I am CLEARLY expressing a preference for being in the better competition no matter what the relative odds of success. Clear to an intelligent poster, anyway.

Hurry, there's still time to cash your government assistance check and then claim your favorite stool at the end of the bar.
If you had even half a brain you would have posted that & not

" I would rather lose 10-0 in the 1st KO round of the CL than win the Europa league "

Don't you get it thicko , there are no odds in your original post because you are choosing definitive outcomes, not possible outcomes.

When you wrote it I called it out for being silly, which it was. In my next post on it I explained why it was silly [ & some of it you are accepting now] . Do you want me to re-post your quote from another thread on being called out for posting rubbish?

You have done a complete u-turn despite saying you will modify nothing but somehow you try to keep arguing it. Own your mistake, be a better man than your CJ club president .
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Enjoy forums? Start your own community for free.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply