|
Walcott and Giroud are better than Sturridge; Sadler - 2015
|
|
Topic Started: Oct 1 2015, 09:26 AM (691 Views)
|
|
dream_team
|
Oct 2 2015, 03:39 AM
Post #11
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
Still no sign of "Sadler the King", for a supposedly 'king' he's a bit of a coward...
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Oct 2 2015, 06:22 AM
Post #12
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 03:38 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:42 AM
Its a bit strange Pizzy posting this after being very vocal in saying Arsenal have the best squad in the prem & he is on record as saying Giroud is one of Arsenals better players, so if , as Pizzy seems to believe, Giroud is one of the better players in the best squad in the premiership would it be so controversial to believe he is better than Sturridge ? Would it be worth starting a separate thread about ?
Much more worthy of a stand alone thread would be Pizzy's belief that Arsenal are better without Alexis & every time he asks for an answer to one of his petty questions I will ask him to copy & paste the part in the Weekend games thread where he explained why Arsenal would be better off without Alexis because he is adamant he has explained it to me there & maybe my eyesight isn't what it was but look as may I just cant find anything resembling an explanation
What I said about Giroud was he was one of our most important players last season and even the season before simply because of the way we play, infact if you look at our results without him last season there's no question that he was our most vital player because without him we're so predictable in attack, which AUTOMATICALLY makes him one of our better players, but that doesn't make him a better striker than Sturridge. I tell you what bog apply the same logic I applied to Giroud to Sturridge, i.e Arsenal attack/results without Giroud and Liverpool attack/results without Sturridge If you want to start a thread on Alexis by all means do so, otherwise you can fuck off! ?
You spend the vast majority of this post simply confirming what I said you wrote so why is it so ludicrous to claim a player you believe is one of Arsenals most vital players , in a squad you say is the best in England, is better than a player who has had one good season, & that was playing alongside the player so good that Barca sold Alexis to accommodate
Do we have to have a brew thread just to ask the same question I have asked on 2 already? cant you just answer it ?
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Oct 2 2015, 06:23 AM
Post #13
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 03:39 AM
Still no sign of "Sadler the King", for a supposedly 'king' he's a bit of a coward... Surely you are missing the smiley face. That had to be tongue in cheek given your history of avoiding questions [ even on this very thread]
|
|
|
| |
|
dream_team
|
Oct 2 2015, 06:27 AM
Post #14
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:22 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 03:38 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:42 AM
Its a bit strange Pizzy posting this after being very vocal in saying Arsenal have the best squad in the prem & he is on record as saying Giroud is one of Arsenals better players, so if , as Pizzy seems to believe, Giroud is one of the better players in the best squad in the premiership would it be so controversial to believe he is better than Sturridge ? Would it be worth starting a separate thread about ?
Much more worthy of a stand alone thread would be Pizzy's belief that Arsenal are better without Alexis & every time he asks for an answer to one of his petty questions I will ask him to copy & paste the part in the Weekend games thread where he explained why Arsenal would be better off without Alexis because he is adamant he has explained it to me there & maybe my eyesight isn't what it was but look as may I just cant find anything resembling an explanation
What I said about Giroud was he was one of our most important players last season and even the season before simply because of the way we play, infact if you look at our results without him last season there's no question that he was our most vital player because without him we're so predictable in attack, which AUTOMATICALLY makes him one of our better players, but that doesn't make him a better striker than Sturridge. I tell you what bog apply the same logic I applied to Giroud to Sturridge, i.e Arsenal attack/results without Giroud and Liverpool attack/results without Sturridge If you want to start a thread on Alexis by all means do so, otherwise you can fuck off!
? You spend the vast majority of this post simply confirming what I said you wrote so why is it so ludicrous to claim a player you believe is one of Arsenals most vital players , in a squad you say is the best in England, is better than a player who has had one good season, & that was playing alongside the player so good that Barca sold Alexis to accommodate Do we have to have a brew thread just to ask the same question I have asked on 2 already? cant you just answer it ? IDIOT, Sturrige has a BIGGER influence at Liverpool than Giroud at Arsenal, better all round footballer, better finisher, better goals to minutes ratio since he started playing regularly for an EPL club, you must be really thick if you can't see this. Sturridge is 2nd/joint 2nd after Aguero as a striker in the league, that Giroud is not as good as the 2nd best striker in the EPL doesn't make him the French Carroll, shit footballer and having the touch of a rapist! Mind you you later referred to him as a "top player" to suit your agenda when you were arguing about your mancrush, idiot!.
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Oct 2 2015, 06:34 AM
Post #15
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 06:27 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:22 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 03:38 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:42 AM
Its a bit strange Pizzy posting this after being very vocal in saying Arsenal have the best squad in the prem & he is on record as saying Giroud is one of Arsenals better players, so if , as Pizzy seems to believe, Giroud is one of the better players in the best squad in the premiership would it be so controversial to believe he is better than Sturridge ? Would it be worth starting a separate thread about ?
Much more worthy of a stand alone thread would be Pizzy's belief that Arsenal are better without Alexis & every time he asks for an answer to one of his petty questions I will ask him to copy & paste the part in the Weekend games thread where he explained why Arsenal would be better off without Alexis because he is adamant he has explained it to me there & maybe my eyesight isn't what it was but look as may I just cant find anything resembling an explanation
What I said about Giroud was he was one of our most important players last season and even the season before simply because of the way we play, infact if you look at our results without him last season there's no question that he was our most vital player because without him we're so predictable in attack, which AUTOMATICALLY makes him one of our better players, but that doesn't make him a better striker than Sturridge. I tell you what bog apply the same logic I applied to Giroud to Sturridge, i.e Arsenal attack/results without Giroud and Liverpool attack/results without Sturridge If you want to start a thread on Alexis by all means do so, otherwise you can fuck off!
? You spend the vast majority of this post simply confirming what I said you wrote so why is it so ludicrous to claim a player you believe is one of Arsenals most vital players , in a squad you say is the best in England, is better than a player who has had one good season, & that was playing alongside the player so good that Barca sold Alexis to accommodate Do we have to have a brew thread just to ask the same question I have asked on 2 already? cant you just answer it ?
IDIOT, Sturrige has a BIGGER influence at Liverpool than Giroud at Arsenal, better all round footballer, better finisher, better goals to minutes ratio since he started playing regularly for an EPL club, you must be really thick if you can't see this. Sturridge is 2nd/joint 2nd after Aguero as a striker in the league, that Giroud is not as good as the 2nd best striker in the EPL doesn't make him the French Carroll, shit footballer and having the touch of a rapist! Mind you you later referred to him as a "top player" to suit your agenda when you were arguing about your mancrush, idiot!. LOL, explain how Sturridge had a BIGGER influence that Giroud, a player you rate higher than Alexis
BTW coward, still waiting for the answer to my question. You cant really call someone a coward who isn't even on the board for doing what you have been doing for ages
|
|
|
| |
|
dream_team
|
Oct 2 2015, 08:04 AM
Post #16
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:34 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 06:27 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:22 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 03:38 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:42 AM
Its a bit strange Pizzy posting this after being very vocal in saying Arsenal have the best squad in the prem & he is on record as saying Giroud is one of Arsenals better players, so if , as Pizzy seems to believe, Giroud is one of the better players in the best squad in the premiership would it be so controversial to believe he is better than Sturridge ? Would it be worth starting a separate thread about ?
Much more worthy of a stand alone thread would be Pizzy's belief that Arsenal are better without Alexis & every time he asks for an answer to one of his petty questions I will ask him to copy & paste the part in the Weekend games thread where he explained why Arsenal would be better off without Alexis because he is adamant he has explained it to me there & maybe my eyesight isn't what it was but look as may I just cant find anything resembling an explanation
What I said about Giroud was he was one of our most important players last season and even the season before simply because of the way we play, infact if you look at our results without him last season there's no question that he was our most vital player because without him we're so predictable in attack, which AUTOMATICALLY makes him one of our better players, but that doesn't make him a better striker than Sturridge. I tell you what bog apply the same logic I applied to Giroud to Sturridge, i.e Arsenal attack/results without Giroud and Liverpool attack/results without Sturridge If you want to start a thread on Alexis by all means do so, otherwise you can fuck off!
? You spend the vast majority of this post simply confirming what I said you wrote so why is it so ludicrous to claim a player you believe is one of Arsenals most vital players , in a squad you say is the best in England, is better than a player who has had one good season, & that was playing alongside the player so good that Barca sold Alexis to accommodate Do we have to have a brew thread just to ask the same question I have asked on 2 already? cant you just answer it ?
IDIOT, Sturrige has a BIGGER influence at Liverpool than Giroud at Arsenal, better all round footballer, better finisher, better goals to minutes ratio since he started playing regularly for an EPL club, you must be really thick if you can't see this. Sturridge is 2nd/joint 2nd after Aguero as a striker in the league, that Giroud is not as good as the 2nd best striker in the EPL doesn't make him the French Carroll, shit footballer and having the touch of a rapist! Mind you you later referred to him as a "top player" to suit your agenda when you were arguing about your mancrush, idiot!.
LOL, explain how Sturridge had a BIGGER influence that Giroud, a player you rate higher than AlexisBTW coward, still waiting for the answer to my question. You cant really call someone a coward who isn't even on the board for doing what you have been doing for ages There's a difference between being a better fit to the team and being better, now fuck off will ya?
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Oct 2 2015, 01:36 PM
Post #17
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 08:04 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:34 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 06:27 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:22 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 03:38 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:42 AM
Its a bit strange Pizzy posting this after being very vocal in saying Arsenal have the best squad in the prem & he is on record as saying Giroud is one of Arsenals better players, so if , as Pizzy seems to believe, Giroud is one of the better players in the best squad in the premiership would it be so controversial to believe he is better than Sturridge ? Would it be worth starting a separate thread about ?
Much more worthy of a stand alone thread would be Pizzy's belief that Arsenal are better without Alexis & every time he asks for an answer to one of his petty questions I will ask him to copy & paste the part in the Weekend games thread where he explained why Arsenal would be better off without Alexis because he is adamant he has explained it to me there & maybe my eyesight isn't what it was but look as may I just cant find anything resembling an explanation
What I said about Giroud was he was one of our most important players last season and even the season before simply because of the way we play, infact if you look at our results without him last season there's no question that he was our most vital player because without him we're so predictable in attack, which AUTOMATICALLY makes him one of our better players, but that doesn't make him a better striker than Sturridge. I tell you what bog apply the same logic I applied to Giroud to Sturridge, i.e Arsenal attack/results without Giroud and Liverpool attack/results without Sturridge If you want to start a thread on Alexis by all means do so, otherwise you can fuck off!
? You spend the vast majority of this post simply confirming what I said you wrote so why is it so ludicrous to claim a player you believe is one of Arsenals most vital players , in a squad you say is the best in England, is better than a player who has had one good season, & that was playing alongside the player so good that Barca sold Alexis to accommodate Do we have to have a brew thread just to ask the same question I have asked on 2 already? cant you just answer it ?
IDIOT, Sturrige has a BIGGER influence at Liverpool than Giroud at Arsenal, better all round footballer, better finisher, better goals to minutes ratio since he started playing regularly for an EPL club, you must be really thick if you can't see this. Sturridge is 2nd/joint 2nd after Aguero as a striker in the league, that Giroud is not as good as the 2nd best striker in the EPL doesn't make him the French Carroll, shit footballer and having the touch of a rapist! Mind you you later referred to him as a "top player" to suit your agenda when you were arguing about your mancrush, idiot!.
LOL, explain how Sturridge had a BIGGER influence that Giroud, a player you rate higher than AlexisBTW coward, still waiting for the answer to my question. You cant really call someone a coward who isn't even on the board for doing what you have been doing for ages
There's a difference between being a better fit to the team and being better, now fuck off will ya? I sense some real anger issues in you Pizzy, but surely yo can see that calling someone a coward for doing exactly what you have been doing for ages does make you look a bit silly to say the least. Now you can end this by simply going back to the Weekend games & copy & pasting the bit where you explained to me why Arsenal are better off without Alexis .
|
|
|
| |
|
dream_team
|
Oct 2 2015, 01:42 PM
Post #18
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:36 PM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 08:04 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:34 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 06:27 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:22 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 03:38 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:42 AM
Its a bit strange Pizzy posting this after being very vocal in saying Arsenal have the best squad in the prem & he is on record as saying Giroud is one of Arsenals better players, so if , as Pizzy seems to believe, Giroud is one of the better players in the best squad in the premiership would it be so controversial to believe he is better than Sturridge ? Would it be worth starting a separate thread about ?
Much more worthy of a stand alone thread would be Pizzy's belief that Arsenal are better without Alexis & every time he asks for an answer to one of his petty questions I will ask him to copy & paste the part in the Weekend games thread where he explained why Arsenal would be better off without Alexis because he is adamant he has explained it to me there & maybe my eyesight isn't what it was but look as may I just cant find anything resembling an explanation
What I said about Giroud was he was one of our most important players last season and even the season before simply because of the way we play, infact if you look at our results without him last season there's no question that he was our most vital player because without him we're so predictable in attack, which AUTOMATICALLY makes him one of our better players, but that doesn't make him a better striker than Sturridge. I tell you what bog apply the same logic I applied to Giroud to Sturridge, i.e Arsenal attack/results without Giroud and Liverpool attack/results without Sturridge If you want to start a thread on Alexis by all means do so, otherwise you can fuck off!
? You spend the vast majority of this post simply confirming what I said you wrote so why is it so ludicrous to claim a player you believe is one of Arsenals most vital players , in a squad you say is the best in England, is better than a player who has had one good season, & that was playing alongside the player so good that Barca sold Alexis to accommodate Do we have to have a brew thread just to ask the same question I have asked on 2 already? cant you just answer it ?
IDIOT, Sturrige has a BIGGER influence at Liverpool than Giroud at Arsenal, better all round footballer, better finisher, better goals to minutes ratio since he started playing regularly for an EPL club, you must be really thick if you can't see this. Sturridge is 2nd/joint 2nd after Aguero as a striker in the league, that Giroud is not as good as the 2nd best striker in the EPL doesn't make him the French Carroll, shit footballer and having the touch of a rapist! Mind you you later referred to him as a "top player" to suit your agenda when you were arguing about your mancrush, idiot!.
LOL, explain how Sturridge had a BIGGER influence that Giroud, a player you rate higher than AlexisBTW coward, still waiting for the answer to my question. You cant really call someone a coward who isn't even on the board for doing what you have been doing for ages
There's a difference between being a better fit to the team and being better, now fuck off will ya?
I sense some real anger issues in you Pizzy, but surely yo can see that calling someone a coward for doing exactly what you have been doing for ages does make you look a bit silly to say the least. Now you can end this by simply going back to the Weekend games & copy & pasting the bit where you explained to me why Arsenal are better off without Alexis . Why are we even having this conversation, do you actually agree that theo and Giroud are better than Sturridge??
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Oct 2 2015, 01:54 PM
Post #19
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 01:42 PM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:36 PM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 08:04 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:34 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 06:27 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 06:22 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 2 2015, 03:38 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 2 2015, 01:42 AM
Its a bit strange Pizzy posting this after being very vocal in saying Arsenal have the best squad in the prem & he is on record as saying Giroud is one of Arsenals better players, so if , as Pizzy seems to believe, Giroud is one of the better players in the best squad in the premiership would it be so controversial to believe he is better than Sturridge ? Would it be worth starting a separate thread about ?
Much more worthy of a stand alone thread would be Pizzy's belief that Arsenal are better without Alexis & every time he asks for an answer to one of his petty questions I will ask him to copy & paste the part in the Weekend games thread where he explained why Arsenal would be better off without Alexis because he is adamant he has explained it to me there & maybe my eyesight isn't what it was but look as may I just cant find anything resembling an explanation
What I said about Giroud was he was one of our most important players last season and even the season before simply because of the way we play, infact if you look at our results without him last season there's no question that he was our most vital player because without him we're so predictable in attack, which AUTOMATICALLY makes him one of our better players, but that doesn't make him a better striker than Sturridge. I tell you what bog apply the same logic I applied to Giroud to Sturridge, i.e Arsenal attack/results without Giroud and Liverpool attack/results without Sturridge If you want to start a thread on Alexis by all means do so, otherwise you can fuck off!
? You spend the vast majority of this post simply confirming what I said you wrote so why is it so ludicrous to claim a player you believe is one of Arsenals most vital players , in a squad you say is the best in England, is better than a player who has had one good season, & that was playing alongside the player so good that Barca sold Alexis to accommodate Do we have to have a brew thread just to ask the same question I have asked on 2 already? cant you just answer it ?
IDIOT, Sturrige has a BIGGER influence at Liverpool than Giroud at Arsenal, better all round footballer, better finisher, better goals to minutes ratio since he started playing regularly for an EPL club, you must be really thick if you can't see this. Sturridge is 2nd/joint 2nd after Aguero as a striker in the league, that Giroud is not as good as the 2nd best striker in the EPL doesn't make him the French Carroll, shit footballer and having the touch of a rapist! Mind you you later referred to him as a "top player" to suit your agenda when you were arguing about your mancrush, idiot!.
LOL, explain how Sturridge had a BIGGER influence that Giroud, a player you rate higher than AlexisBTW coward, still waiting for the answer to my question. You cant really call someone a coward who isn't even on the board for doing what you have been doing for ages
There's a difference between being a better fit to the team and being better, now fuck off will ya?
I sense some real anger issues in you Pizzy, but surely yo can see that calling someone a coward for doing exactly what you have been doing for ages does make you look a bit silly to say the least. Now you can end this by simply going back to the Weekend games & copy & pasting the bit where you explained to me why Arsenal are better off without Alexis .
Why are we even having this conversation, do you actually agree that theo and Giroud are better than Sturridge?? I personally think Sturridge is better than both but Sadler is entitled to his opinion & its not that radical that it deserved the response you gave it. I have said that Giroud is better than I initially gave him credit for, although even you know, & have actually argued this to others, that my original post . "The French carroll with the touch of a rapist" was more a tongue in cheek wind up than a true analysis
As you know, I rate Benteke higher than Giroud but Benteke is the wrong player for Liverpool. I said 12 months ago that they should have gone for Vardy, he suits their style more. Benteke would have been a good buy for Utd . Don't start on about Martial here unless you can show me something you said before ute bought him that indicated you knw he had some real quality. Even LVG gave himself a disclaimer on martial by saying he bought him for the next manager.
|
|
|
| |
|
SadlerTheKing
|
Oct 2 2015, 04:40 PM
Post #20
|
|
- Posts:
- 7,367
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #55
- Joined:
- May 22, 2014
|
DOn't call me a coward unless you see me post somewhere else while I ignore this post. Unlike you I have a life outside of this website and I haven't been on other than 2 minutes this morning before I left for work. With that being said, BIlla has pretty much said it all. And I haven't been "acting clever" in my replies. I have been offering up the truth. Sturridge has the potential to be a very good player. But like Owen, he has a history of injury problems and has only put in one complete season that was worth noting, and in that season he was playing along side one of the best strikers in the world. Can he do the same without Saurez? Maybe, maybe not. As for Walcott, he has had several good seasons, most of which as a winger, and has put up decent results. BUt like Sturridge he also has his injury problems. Mind you, he has put up more than one good season, and at the same age as Sturridge has played roughly 120 more games for his club and 25 more for his country...
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|