|
Spain vs Urkane
|
|
Topic Started: Oct 12 2015, 02:16 PM (327 Views)
|
|
dream_team
|
Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
Post #21
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
Asumming everyone is fit, this is England best team
....................Hart.................................
Shaw....Stones......Smalling.............Clyne
............Henderson.....Wilshere..............
Walcott.................Kane........................Ox
...................Sturridge......................
|
|
|
| |
|
dream_team
|
Oct 14 2015, 04:44 AM
Post #22
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:37 AM
LOL bog thinks all you need to win football games is just put 10 outfield players with pace and no football brain out there, that team would fumble big time.
Piizzy doesn't think, he just bites like a dumb mutt. Oxlade chamberlain isn't renowned for his football brain yet you rate him ever so highly, higher than Alexis as i recall the LOL is, as usual, on you He has twice the football brain of Raheem 'England Saviour' Sterling....
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Oct 14 2015, 04:47 AM
Post #23
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:44 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:37 AM
LOL bog thinks all you need to win football games is just put 10 outfield players with pace and no football brain out there, that team would fumble big time.
Piizzy doesn't think, he just bites like a dumb mutt. Oxlade chamberlain isn't renowned for his football brain yet you rate him ever so highly, higher than Alexis as i recall the LOL is, as usual, on you
He has twice the football brain of Raheem 'England Saviour' Sterling.... No he doesn't, neither have been blessed much in the football brain department , but as usual in your pea size malignant brain your opinion trumps all others . Show me a link to AOC winning Europes young player of the year award, surely you can do that, or post the stats that show Ox [ who I like BTW] has a better scoring ratio our is more accurate tha Sterling when shooting .
|
|
|
| |
|
dream_team
|
Oct 14 2015, 05:02 AM
Post #24
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:47 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:44 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:37 AM
LOL bog thinks all you need to win football games is just put 10 outfield players with pace and no football brain out there, that team would fumble big time.
Piizzy doesn't think, he just bites like a dumb mutt. Oxlade chamberlain isn't renowned for his football brain yet you rate him ever so highly, higher than Alexis as i recall the LOL is, as usual, on you
He has twice the football brain of Raheem 'England Saviour' Sterling....
No he doesn't, neither have been blessed much in the football brain department , but as usual in your pea size malignant brain your opinion trumps all others . Show me a link to AOC winning Europes young player of the year award, surely you can do that, or post the stats that show Ox [ who I like BTW] has a better scoring ratio our is more accurate tha Sterling when shooting . Obvioulsly because both are young players they need game time.
Sterling will obviously have a better scoring ratio 1)Sterling was playing for a lesser team hence had more game time that Ox, hence can get some consitence and run in his game 2)Sterling had opportunity of player CF last season, I believe of the game time he was given he probably played up to 50% as a CF, ox is played mainly as a winger and probably spend close to 25% of his playing time playing as a CM
Even someone as dumb as you will be able to see Sterling will obviously have the better scoring ratio
Any coincidence that England's Saviour is now seeing less game time at City and is getting substituted almost in every game, he was even booted out at half time in the last game city went on to score 5 goals in his absence OUCH! Only a matter of time before Pellegrini reaizes this kid is not as good as advertised.
Notice all your remaining Raheem Sterling's fanboys are now taking a backflip?, I mean England biggest hope didn't even make Trees England best XI, even though he's apparently better than Walcott in trees eyes, go figure!
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Oct 14 2015, 02:33 PM
Post #25
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 05:02 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:47 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:44 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:37 AM
LOL bog thinks all you need to win football games is just put 10 outfield players with pace and no football brain out there, that team would fumble big time.
Piizzy doesn't think, he just bites like a dumb mutt. Oxlade chamberlain isn't renowned for his football brain yet you rate him ever so highly, higher than Alexis as i recall the LOL is, as usual, on you
He has twice the football brain of Raheem 'England Saviour' Sterling....
No he doesn't, neither have been blessed much in the football brain department , but as usual in your pea size malignant brain your opinion trumps all others . Show me a link to AOC winning Europes young player of the year award, surely you can do that, or post the stats that show Ox [ who I like BTW] has a better scoring ratio our is more accurate tha Sterling when shooting .
Obvioulsly because both are young players they need game time. Sterling will obviously have a better scoring ratio 1)Sterling was playing for a lesser team hence had more game time that Ox, hence can get some consitence and run in his game 2)Sterling had opportunity of player CF last season, I believe of the game time he was given he probably played up to 50% as a CF, ox is played mainly as a winger and probably spend close to 25% of his playing time playing as a CM Even someone as dumb as you will be able to see Sterling will obviously have the better scoring ratio Any coincidence that England's Saviour is now seeing less game time at City and is getting substituted almost in every game, he was even booted out at half time in the last game city went on to score 5 goals in his absence OUCH! Only a matter of time before Pellegrini reaizes this kid is not as good as advertised. Notice all your remaining Raheem Sterling's fanboys are now taking a backflip?, I mean England biggest hope didn't even make Trees England best XI, even though he's apparently better than Walcott in trees eyes, go figure! Sterling had a better goal per game ratio even in the season Liverpool were better than Arsenal playing the full season as a winger. keep trying though Pizzy, you might eventually chance upon a valid point
|
|
|
| |
|
jbird
|
Oct 14 2015, 11:20 PM
Post #26
|
|
- Posts:
- 689
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #29
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
Asumming everyone is fit, this is England best team
....................Hart.................................
Shaw....Stones......Smalling.............Clyne
............Henderson.....Wilshere..............
Walcott.................Kane........................Ox
...................Sturridge......................
What makes you think Kane can be a success as a # 10?
|
|
|
| |
|
dream_team
|
Oct 15 2015, 04:59 AM
Post #27
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 02:33 PM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 05:02 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:47 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:44 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:37 AM
LOL bog thinks all you need to win football games is just put 10 outfield players with pace and no football brain out there, that team would fumble big time.
Piizzy doesn't think, he just bites like a dumb mutt. Oxlade chamberlain isn't renowned for his football brain yet you rate him ever so highly, higher than Alexis as i recall the LOL is, as usual, on you
He has twice the football brain of Raheem 'England Saviour' Sterling....
No he doesn't, neither have been blessed much in the football brain department , but as usual in your pea size malignant brain your opinion trumps all others . Show me a link to AOC winning Europes young player of the year award, surely you can do that, or post the stats that show Ox [ who I like BTW] has a better scoring ratio our is more accurate tha Sterling when shooting .
Obvioulsly because both are young players they need game time. Sterling will obviously have a better scoring ratio 1)Sterling was playing for a lesser team hence had more game time that Ox, hence can get some consitence and run in his game 2)Sterling had opportunity of player CF last season, I believe of the game time he was given he probably played up to 50% as a CF, ox is played mainly as a winger and probably spend close to 25% of his playing time playing as a CM Even someone as dumb as you will be able to see Sterling will obviously have the better scoring ratio Any coincidence that England's Saviour is now seeing less game time at City and is getting substituted almost in every game, he was even booted out at half time in the last game city went on to score 5 goals in his absence OUCH! Only a matter of time before Pellegrini reaizes this kid is not as good as advertised. Notice all your remaining Raheem Sterling's fanboys are now taking a backflip?, I mean England biggest hope didn't even make Trees England best XI, even though he's apparently better than Walcott in trees eyes, go figure!
Sterling had a better goal per game ratio even in the season Liverpool were better than Arsenal playing the full season as a winger. keep trying though Pizzy, you might eventually chance upon a valid point And he had more game time than Ox, Ox was had a knee injury for close to 6 months that season and was competing with Podolski, Theo, Wilshere /Ozil/Cazorla Wenger uses at least one of this trio on the wings. Remind me of how many months Sterling was out due to injury and the wingers/AM he was competing with....
|
|
|
| |
|
dream_team
|
Oct 15 2015, 05:05 AM
Post #28
|
|
- Posts:
- 9,001
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #53
- Joined:
- Dec 4, 2013
|
- jbird
- Oct 14 2015, 11:20 PM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
Asumming everyone is fit, this is England best team
....................Hart.................................
Shaw....Stones......Smalling.............Clyne
............Henderson.....Wilshere..............
Walcott.................Kane........................Ox
...................Sturridge......................
What makes you think Kane can be a success as a # 10? Because he's an intelligent player, passes the ball well and has great vision. Like LVG said he reminds him of Muller, for me he reminds me of a certain Roma Captain...
|
|
|
| |
|
jbird
|
Oct 15 2015, 06:49 AM
Post #29
|
|
- Posts:
- 689
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #29
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 15 2015, 05:05 AM
- jbird
- Oct 14 2015, 11:20 PM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
Asumming everyone is fit, this is England best team
....................Hart.................................
Shaw....Stones......Smalling.............Clyne
............Henderson.....Wilshere..............
Walcott.................Kane........................Ox
...................Sturridge......................
What makes you think Kane can be a success as a # 10?
Because he's an intelligent player, passes the ball well and has great vision. Like LVG said he reminds him of Muller, for me he reminds me of a certain Roma Captain... Hmm. Guess I haven't seen him play enough. Thought he was more of a poacher.
|
|
|
| |
|
billabog5
|
Oct 15 2015, 01:54 PM
Post #30
|
|
- Posts:
- 8,461
- Group:
- Members
- Member
- #39
- Joined:
- Jul 31, 2013
|
- dream_team
- Oct 15 2015, 04:59 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 02:33 PM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 05:02 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:47 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:44 AM
- billabog5
- Oct 14 2015, 04:42 AM
- dream_team
- Oct 14 2015, 04:37 AM
LOL bog thinks all you need to win football games is just put 10 outfield players with pace and no football brain out there, that team would fumble big time.
Piizzy doesn't think, he just bites like a dumb mutt. Oxlade chamberlain isn't renowned for his football brain yet you rate him ever so highly, higher than Alexis as i recall the LOL is, as usual, on you
He has twice the football brain of Raheem 'England Saviour' Sterling....
No he doesn't, neither have been blessed much in the football brain department , but as usual in your pea size malignant brain your opinion trumps all others . Show me a link to AOC winning Europes young player of the year award, surely you can do that, or post the stats that show Ox [ who I like BTW] has a better scoring ratio our is more accurate tha Sterling when shooting .
Obvioulsly because both are young players they need game time. Sterling will obviously have a better scoring ratio 1)Sterling was playing for a lesser team hence had more game time that Ox, hence can get some consitence and run in his game 2)Sterling had opportunity of player CF last season, I believe of the game time he was given he probably played up to 50% as a CF, ox is played mainly as a winger and probably spend close to 25% of his playing time playing as a CM Even someone as dumb as you will be able to see Sterling will obviously have the better scoring ratio Any coincidence that England's Saviour is now seeing less game time at City and is getting substituted almost in every game, he was even booted out at half time in the last game city went on to score 5 goals in his absence OUCH! Only a matter of time before Pellegrini reaizes this kid is not as good as advertised. Notice all your remaining Raheem Sterling's fanboys are now taking a backflip?, I mean England biggest hope didn't even make Trees England best XI, even though he's apparently better than Walcott in trees eyes, go figure!
Sterling had a better goal per game ratio even in the season Liverpool were better than Arsenal playing the full season as a winger. keep trying though Pizzy, you might eventually chance upon a valid point
And he had more game time than Ox, Ox was had a knee injury for close to 6 months that season and was competing with Podolski, Theo, Wilshere /Ozil/Cazorla Wenger uses at least one of this trio on the wings. Remind me of how many months Sterling was out due to injury and the wingers/AM he was competing with.... I see you missed out the name of the far superior player to Ox who is keeping AOC out of the team
Make as many excuses as you want Pizzy, but at the end of the day , for club & country, Sterling has outperformed AOC . I like AOC, but given a chance between signing he or Sterling, I would go with Sterling every time, but then again I am not carrying all that petty baggage you lug around
|
|
|
| |
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
|