Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Add Reply
PV4 and billabog; Here's a boxing ring for you
Topic Started: Aug 18 2013, 01:47 AM (325 Views)
rw_mlite2
Member Avatar

Keep it out of the other threads.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
billabog5
Member Avatar

rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 01:47 AM
Keep it out of the other threads.
Don't try to police me rw unless things get out of hand

My post to Billy was reasonable, he called people dogs who watched the game yet he watched it himself, I merely asked him if he was a dog

If you are happy to be labelled a dog/bitch for watching your team then good for you, even as a none Arsenal fan I found that offensive
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rw_mlite2
Member Avatar

billabog5
Aug 18 2013, 02:36 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 01:47 AM
Keep it out of the other threads.
Don't try to police me rw unless things get out of hand

My post to Billy was reasonable, he called people dogs who watched the game yet he watched it himself, I merely asked him if he was a dog

If you are happy to be labelled a dog/bitch for watching your team then good for you, even as a none Arsenal fan I found that offensive
I'm policing BOTH of you. Don't like it? Too bad. Wouldn't be a big deal if you guys could contain it, but it's already spilled into multiple threads.

FWIW, I saw the remark, rolled my eyes, and moved on.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gunner_PV4
Member Avatar

rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 02:57 AM
billabog5
Aug 18 2013, 02:36 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 01:47 AM
Keep it out of the other threads.
Don't try to police me rw unless things get out of hand

My post to Billy was reasonable, he called people dogs who watched the game yet he watched it himself, I merely asked him if he was a dog

If you are happy to be labelled a dog/bitch for watching your team then good for you, even as a none Arsenal fan I found that offensive
I'm policing BOTH of you. Don't like it? Too bad. Wouldn't be a big deal if you guys could contain it, but it's already spilled into multiple threads.

FWIW, I saw the remark, rolled my eyes, and moved on.


RW, I will reply. I did not call anyone a dog (I like dogs way more than most humans. That is a fact. Their loyalty and honour is fascinating for me.I don;t mean it as an insult, but I think I like any dog more than any single one of you here based on ageneralization of what I feel dogs are compared to most humans. That is my point of view).

I am simply using common metaphor of dogs (not my personal point of view) to let people know how I feel the Arsenal board is treating supporters of Arsenal Football Club and reducing them into powerless eunachs (pardon the strong metaphors, but I am trying to put forth my views forcefully...), to what I feel is a bunch of moaners who turn up dutifully at the next game as paying spectators or television viewers, who give the board no reason to change it's ways for the betterment of Arsenal Football Club.

I think billa chooses to interpret things his own way, to score ass-kissing points. I did not target him (in fact I invited him into this board when he was moaning). He wanted a piece of me, "anytime, anywhere" and he pressed for that thread in ESPN to be taken down. A later post in ESPN, he says he got no money to fly back to England (unsolicited, nobody puts aknife on his neck to say these things) I mean, really! He will meet me anytime any place, but no money to fly back home. I honestly felt nothing but pity for him

So if he comes here talking like it's wrong for me to feel that the supporters of Arsenal FC have power to change the direction of the club , and that he can set off an attack against my posts (again, I have initiated no attack on him, and only returning fire) I do not think you are in any way fair to castigate me.

Don't elevate yourself into a position of being a judge unless you can resolve the issue. Or else, I politely like to tell you, in spite of the fact, I think you r nothing but a fence-sitting wanker, I have never attacked you b4 and won't attack you again.
Edited by Gunner_PV4, Aug 18 2013, 03:24 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rw_mlite2
Member Avatar

Gunner_PV4
Aug 18 2013, 03:20 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 02:57 AM
billabog5
Aug 18 2013, 02:36 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 01:47 AM
Keep it out of the other threads.
Don't try to police me rw unless things get out of hand

My post to Billy was reasonable, he called people dogs who watched the game yet he watched it himself, I merely asked him if he was a dog

If you are happy to be labelled a dog/bitch for watching your team then good for you, even as a none Arsenal fan I found that offensive
I'm policing BOTH of you. Don't like it? Too bad. Wouldn't be a big deal if you guys could contain it, but it's already spilled into multiple threads.

FWIW, I saw the remark, rolled my eyes, and moved on.


RW, I will reply. I did not call anyone a dog (I like dogs way more than most humans. That is a fact. Their loyalty and honour is fascinating for me.I don;t mean it as an insult, but I think I like any dog more than any single one of you here based on ageneralization of what I feel dogs are compared to most humans. That is my point of view).

I am simply using common metaphor of dogs (not my personal point of view) to let people know how I feel the Arsenal board is treating supporters of Arsenal Football Club and reducing them into powerless eunachs (pardon the strong metaphors, but I am trying to put forth my views forcefully...), to what I feel is a bunch of moaners who turn up dutifully at the next game as paying spectators or television viewers, who give the board no reason to change it's ways for the betterment of Arsenal Football Club.

I think billa chooses to interpret things his own way, to score ass-kissing points. I did not target him (in fact I invited him into this board when he was moaning). He wanted a piece of me, "anytime, anywhere" and he pressed for that thread in ESPN to be taken down. A later post in ESPN, he says he got no money to fly back to England (unsolicited, nobody puts aknife on his neck to say these things) I mean, really! He will meet me anytime any place, but no money to fly back home. I honestly felt nothing but pity for him

So if he comes here talking like it's wrong for me to feel that the supporters of Arsenal FC have power to change the direction of the club , and that he can set off an attack against my posts (again, I have initiated no attack on him, and only returning fire) I do not think you are in any way fair to castigate me.

Don't elevate yourself into a position of being a judge unless you can resolve the issue. Or else, I politely like to tell you, in spite of the fact, I think you r nothing but a fence-sitting wanker, I have never attacked you b4 and won't attack you again.
I'm sorry you feel that way. Am I fence sitter? Maybe. Others on here accuse me of being a lapdog. So which is it? I like to think I've normally taken a 'moderate' view on the forums, just as in my political thinking. I've been accused of being a fence sitter there, too...usually by those who toe the party line far too often. They think a fence sitter is someone without the backbone to make a decision. I feel they are too stubborn and ignorant to open their minds to opposing viewpoints. Which is worse, I wonder? As for the "wanker" comment...I'll go ahead and let that slide. You feel you're being attacked. Though I'll say that if I wanted to attack you, I could...and would. You've certainly given your enemies plenty of ammunition over the course of your time with us. And just like how you've let your true feelings about me be known, there's plenty I could say about you. But, other than a brief volley with dt5 in the early infancy of this forum, I've stayed away from the personal stuff. Even with him. Just as he's done with me. And I think the board is better off for it. Considering that this forum is supposed to be a rebirth, of sorts, I'm trying not to contribute to that anymore.

To be honest, I don't feel that I'm attacking EITHER of you here. I didn't take sides. Like I said before, if you two had contained it within the one thread, it wouldn't have been so bad. But it had already spilled onto a second...and then a third thread. But I'm the one in the wrong here? Get over yourself.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
santry_gooner
Member Avatar

Choosing to complain about personality clashes after the fact, but without the spine to face them down is the thing that ruined the other board and will ruin this one eventually. Nobody thought to ask PV4 to clarify what he meant before the troll that YOU invited over got his hands on the comment. The cycle continues.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gunner_PV4
Member Avatar

" Though I'll say that if I wanted to attack you, I could...and would"


You really are Bruce Banner, aren't you?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Gunner_PV4
Member Avatar

rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 03:39 AM
Gunner_PV4
Aug 18 2013, 03:20 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 02:57 AM
billabog5
Aug 18 2013, 02:36 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 01:47 AM
Keep it out of the other threads.
Don't try to police me rw unless things get out of hand

My post to Billy was reasonable, he called people dogs who watched the game yet he watched it himself, I merely asked him if he was a dog

If you are happy to be labelled a dog/bitch for watching your team then good for you, even as a none Arsenal fan I found that offensive
I'm policing BOTH of you. Don't like it? Too bad. Wouldn't be a big deal if you guys could contain it, but it's already spilled into multiple threads.

FWIW, I saw the remark, rolled my eyes, and moved on.


RW, I will reply. I did not call anyone a dog (I like dogs way more than most humans. That is a fact. Their loyalty and honour is fascinating for me.I don;t mean it as an insult, but I think I like any dog more than any single one of you here based on ageneralization of what I feel dogs are compared to most humans. That is my point of view).

I am simply using common metaphor of dogs (not my personal point of view) to let people know how I feel the Arsenal board is treating supporters of Arsenal Football Club and reducing them into powerless eunachs (pardon the strong metaphors, but I am trying to put forth my views forcefully...), to what I feel is a bunch of moaners who turn up dutifully at the next game as paying spectators or television viewers, who give the board no reason to change it's ways for the betterment of Arsenal Football Club.

I think billa chooses to interpret things his own way, to score ass-kissing points. I did not target him (in fact I invited him into this board when he was moaning). He wanted a piece of me, "anytime, anywhere" and he pressed for that thread in ESPN to be taken down. A later post in ESPN, he says he got no money to fly back to England (unsolicited, nobody puts aknife on his neck to say these things) I mean, really! He will meet me anytime any place, but no money to fly back home. I honestly felt nothing but pity for him

So if he comes here talking like it's wrong for me to feel that the supporters of Arsenal FC have power to change the direction of the club , and that he can set off an attack against my posts (again, I have initiated no attack on him, and only returning fire) I do not think you are in any way fair to castigate me.

Don't elevate yourself into a position of being a judge unless you can resolve the issue. Or else, I politely like to tell you, in spite of the fact, I think you r nothing but a fence-sitting wanker, I have never attacked you b4 and won't attack you again.
I'm sorry you feel that way. Am I fence sitter? Maybe. Others on here accuse me of being a lapdog. So which is it? I like to think I've normally taken a 'moderate' view on the forums, just as in my political thinking. I've been accused of being a fence sitter there, too...usually by those who toe the party line far too often. They think a fence sitter is someone without the backbone to make a decision. I feel they are too stubborn and ignorant to open their minds to opposing viewpoints. Which is worse, I wonder? As for the "wanker" comment...I'll go ahead and let that slide. You feel you're being attacked. Though I'll say that if I wanted to attack you, I could...and would. You've certainly given your enemies plenty of ammunition over the course of your time with us. And just like how you've let your true feelings about me be known, there's plenty I could say about you. But, other than a brief volley with dt5 in the early infancy of this forum, I've stayed away from the personal stuff. Even with him. Just as he's done with me. And I think the board is better off for it. Considering that this forum is supposed to be a rebirth, of sorts, I'm trying not to contribute to that anymore.

To be honest, I don't feel that I'm attacking EITHER of you here. I didn't take sides. Like I said before, if you two had contained it within the one thread, it wouldn't have been so bad. But it had already spilled onto a second...and then a third thread. But I'm the one in the wrong here? Get over yourself.
You need to analyze who started the issue. Is he even an Arsenl Supporter? What is his intention/ And you are falling for the divide and rule tactics And you don;t see it. Nobody said, you are in the wrong. If you want to Police me, please tell me why?

And on what moral authority do you propose to police me?

And since you have been classified as a fence-sitter few/many times before, is pointing the finger at someone else your way of justifying your existence?

Some day, when you feel ready, you are invited to come over to show me how good you are. If right now, it'll be in Thailand.
Edited by Gunner_PV4, Aug 18 2013, 04:00 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rw_mlite2
Member Avatar

santry_gooner
Aug 18 2013, 03:42 AM
Choosing to complain about personality clashes after the fact, but without the spine to face them down is the thing that ruined the other board and will ruin this one eventually. Nobody thought to ask PV4 to clarify what he meant before the troll that YOU invited over got his hands on the comment. The cycle continues.
santry, you should be the last person on here to complain about personality clashes as you are the biggest culprit on here. You seem to be the only one who can't get along with anyone. But I suppose it's all in the name of the crusade to rid those who aren't pure enough to be a true supporter. Isn't that it?

You also have selective memory. I had plenty "spine" to put whomever I needed to in place on the old board. The difference between you and I, though, is that not every disagreement needed to turn into an all out blood bath. It is just an internet forum, after all.

As for inviting billabog over here, you want to blame me? Fine. Keep in mind, however, that although a handful of posters would get into it with him (including myself), there was really only one who could truly bring out the absolute worst in him. Care to guess who that might be? For every yin there is a yang, after all.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
rw_mlite2
Member Avatar

Gunner_PV4
Aug 18 2013, 03:57 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 03:39 AM
Gunner_PV4
Aug 18 2013, 03:20 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 02:57 AM
billabog5
Aug 18 2013, 02:36 AM
rw_mlite2
Aug 18 2013, 01:47 AM
Keep it out of the other threads.
Don't try to police me rw unless things get out of hand

My post to Billy was reasonable, he called people dogs who watched the game yet he watched it himself, I merely asked him if he was a dog

If you are happy to be labelled a dog/bitch for watching your team then good for you, even as a none Arsenal fan I found that offensive
I'm policing BOTH of you. Don't like it? Too bad. Wouldn't be a big deal if you guys could contain it, but it's already spilled into multiple threads.

FWIW, I saw the remark, rolled my eyes, and moved on.


RW, I will reply. I did not call anyone a dog (I like dogs way more than most humans. That is a fact. Their loyalty and honour is fascinating for me.I don;t mean it as an insult, but I think I like any dog more than any single one of you here based on ageneralization of what I feel dogs are compared to most humans. That is my point of view).

I am simply using common metaphor of dogs (not my personal point of view) to let people know how I feel the Arsenal board is treating supporters of Arsenal Football Club and reducing them into powerless eunachs (pardon the strong metaphors, but I am trying to put forth my views forcefully...), to what I feel is a bunch of moaners who turn up dutifully at the next game as paying spectators or television viewers, who give the board no reason to change it's ways for the betterment of Arsenal Football Club.

I think billa chooses to interpret things his own way, to score ass-kissing points. I did not target him (in fact I invited him into this board when he was moaning). He wanted a piece of me, "anytime, anywhere" and he pressed for that thread in ESPN to be taken down. A later post in ESPN, he says he got no money to fly back to England (unsolicited, nobody puts aknife on his neck to say these things) I mean, really! He will meet me anytime any place, but no money to fly back home. I honestly felt nothing but pity for him

So if he comes here talking like it's wrong for me to feel that the supporters of Arsenal FC have power to change the direction of the club , and that he can set off an attack against my posts (again, I have initiated no attack on him, and only returning fire) I do not think you are in any way fair to castigate me.

Don't elevate yourself into a position of being a judge unless you can resolve the issue. Or else, I politely like to tell you, in spite of the fact, I think you r nothing but a fence-sitting wanker, I have never attacked you b4 and won't attack you again.
I'm sorry you feel that way. Am I fence sitter? Maybe. Others on here accuse me of being a lapdog. So which is it? I like to think I've normally taken a 'moderate' view on the forums, just as in my political thinking. I've been accused of being a fence sitter there, too...usually by those who toe the party line far too often. They think a fence sitter is someone without the backbone to make a decision. I feel they are too stubborn and ignorant to open their minds to opposing viewpoints. Which is worse, I wonder? As for the "wanker" comment...I'll go ahead and let that slide. You feel you're being attacked. Though I'll say that if I wanted to attack you, I could...and would. You've certainly given your enemies plenty of ammunition over the course of your time with us. And just like how you've let your true feelings about me be known, there's plenty I could say about you. But, other than a brief volley with dt5 in the early infancy of this forum, I've stayed away from the personal stuff. Even with him. Just as he's done with me. And I think the board is better off for it. Considering that this forum is supposed to be a rebirth, of sorts, I'm trying not to contribute to that anymore.

To be honest, I don't feel that I'm attacking EITHER of you here. I didn't take sides. Like I said before, if you two had contained it within the one thread, it wouldn't have been so bad. But it had already spilled onto a second...and then a third thread. But I'm the one in the wrong here? Get over yourself.
You need to analyze who started the issue. Is he even an Arsenl Supporter? What is his intention/ And you are falling for the divide and rule tactics And you don;t see it. Nobody said, you are in the wrong. If you want to Police me, please tell me why?

And on what moral authority do you propose to police me?

And since you have been classified as a fence-sitter few/many times before, is pointing the finger at someone else your way of justifying your existence?

Some day, when you feel ready, you are invited to come over to show me how good you are. If right now, it'll be in Thailand.
Ahh, yes. So here we are. The same salvos you've thrown at others are finally getting dropped in my direction. So it's a matter of who started it? Just like I tell my kids...I don't care. It's a juvenile response fit for a child. As for morals, I'm not claiming any. I've already explained twice my reason for starting this thread. Maybe third time will be a charm? Keep the arguments contained within one thread for the sake of this forum. Justifying my existence? If you think playing on an internet message board is a way to justify an existence, so be it. That says more about the accuser than the accused. And as for your last nugget...are you that lacking in your own life that anytime you're questioned on here you feel the need to set up the legitimate ring as opposed to the virtual one? What does that say about a person? Maybe time for some introspection on your part.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
ZetaBoards - Free Forum Hosting
Create a free forum in seconds.
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Discussion · Next Topic »
Add Reply